TY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

TrueShares Active Yield ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Tri-Continental Corp.'s net margin of --. Tri-Continental Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat TrueShares Active Yield ETF's return on equity of --.

Tri-Continental Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TrueShares Active Yield ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tri-Continental Corp. has higher upside potential than TrueShares Active Yield ETF, analysts believe Tri-Continental Corp. is more attractive than TrueShares Active Yield ETF.

Tri-Continental Corp. has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 17.036% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TrueShares Active Yield ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tri-Continental Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $2.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.6%. TrueShares Active Yield ETF offers a yield of 9.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Tri-Continental Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TrueShares Active Yield ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tri-Continental Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TrueShares Active Yield ETF quarterly revenues of --. Tri-Continental Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than TrueShares Active Yield ETF's net income of --. Notably, Tri-Continental Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TrueShares Active Yield ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tri-Continental Corp. is -- versus -- for TrueShares Active Yield ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Tri-Continental Corp.'s net margin of --. Tri-Continental Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund's return on equity of --.

Tri-Continental Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tri-Continental Corp. has higher upside potential than Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund, analysts believe Tri-Continental Corp. is more attractive than Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund.

Tri-Continental Corp. has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 17.036% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund has a beta of 1.082, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.176%.

Tri-Continental Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $2.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.6%. Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund offers a yield of 7.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Tri-Continental Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tri-Continental Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. Tri-Continental Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, Tri-Continental Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tri-Continental Corp. is -- versus -- for Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust has a net margin of -- compared to Tri-Continental Corp.'s net margin of --. Tri-Continental Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust's return on equity of --.

Tri-Continental Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tri-Continental Corp. has higher upside potential than Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust, analysts believe Tri-Continental Corp. is more attractive than Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust.

Tri-Continental Corp. has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 17.036% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust has a beta of 1.038, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.774%.

Tri-Continental Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $2.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.6%. Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust offers a yield of 5.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Tri-Continental Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tri-Continental Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust quarterly revenues of --. Tri-Continental Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust's net income of --. Notably, Tri-Continental Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tri-Continental Corp. is -- versus -- for Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SRH Total Return Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Tri-Continental Corp.'s net margin of --. Tri-Continental Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat SRH Total Return Fund's return on equity of --.

Tri-Continental Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SRH Total Return Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tri-Continental Corp. has higher upside potential than SRH Total Return Fund, analysts believe Tri-Continental Corp. is more attractive than SRH Total Return Fund.

Tri-Continental Corp. has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 17.036% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SRH Total Return Fund has a beta of 0.909, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.138%.

Tri-Continental Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $2.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.6%. SRH Total Return Fund offers a yield of 3.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Tri-Continental Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SRH Total Return Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tri-Continental Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SRH Total Return Fund quarterly revenues of --. Tri-Continental Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than SRH Total Return Fund's net income of --. Notably, Tri-Continental Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SRH Total Return Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tri-Continental Corp. is -- versus -- for SRH Total Return Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.