STEW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to SRH Total Return Fund's net margin of --. SRH Total Return Fund's return on equity of -- beat Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund's return on equity of --.

SRH Total Return Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SRH Total Return Fund has higher upside potential than Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund, analysts believe SRH Total Return Fund is more attractive than Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund.

SRH Total Return Fund has a beta of 0.906, which suggesting that the stock is 9.356% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund has a beta of 1.089, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.903%.

SRH Total Return Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.57%. Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund offers a yield of 7.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. SRH Total Return Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SRH Total Return Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. SRH Total Return Fund's net income of -- is lower than Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, SRH Total Return Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SRH Total Return Fund is -- versus -- for Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Dividend Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust has a net margin of -- compared to SRH Total Return Fund's net margin of --. SRH Total Return Fund's return on equity of -- beat Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust's return on equity of --.

SRH Total Return Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SRH Total Return Fund has higher upside potential than Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust, analysts believe SRH Total Return Fund is more attractive than Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust.

SRH Total Return Fund has a beta of 0.906, which suggesting that the stock is 9.356% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust has a beta of 1.039, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.942%.

SRH Total Return Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.57%. Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust offers a yield of 6.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. SRH Total Return Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SRH Total Return Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust quarterly revenues of --. SRH Total Return Fund's net income of -- is lower than Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust's net income of --. Notably, SRH Total Return Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SRH Total Return Fund is -- versus -- for Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tri-Continental Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to SRH Total Return Fund's net margin of --. SRH Total Return Fund's return on equity of -- beat Tri-Continental Corp.'s return on equity of --.

SRH Total Return Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tri-Continental Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SRH Total Return Fund has higher upside potential than Tri-Continental Corp., analysts believe SRH Total Return Fund is more attractive than Tri-Continental Corp..

SRH Total Return Fund has a beta of 0.906, which suggesting that the stock is 9.356% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tri-Continental Corp. has a beta of 0.833, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.669%.

SRH Total Return Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.57%. Tri-Continental Corp. offers a yield of 5.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.32 per share. SRH Total Return Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tri-Continental Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SRH Total Return Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tri-Continental Corp. quarterly revenues of --. SRH Total Return Fund's net income of -- is lower than Tri-Continental Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, SRH Total Return Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tri-Continental Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SRH Total Return Fund is -- versus -- for Tri-Continental Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.