TX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Core Molding Technologies has a net margin of 0.71% compared to Ternium SA's net margin of 4.33%. Ternium SA's return on equity of 0.47% beat Core Molding Technologies's return on equity of 10.91%.

Ternium SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 53.83%. On the other hand Core Molding Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 44.67%. Given that Ternium SA has higher upside potential than Core Molding Technologies, analysts believe Ternium SA is more attractive than Core Molding Technologies.

Ternium SA has a beta of 1.673, which suggesting that the stock is 67.291% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Molding Technologies has a beta of 1.748, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.77%.

Ternium SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.77%. Core Molding Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ternium SA pays 84.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Molding Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ternium SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ternium SA quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are larger than Core Molding Technologies quarterly revenues of $73M. Ternium SA's net income of $31.7M is higher than Core Molding Technologies's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Ternium SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.20x while Core Molding Technologies's PE ratio is 9.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ternium SA is 0.30x versus 0.47x for Core Molding Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexible Solutions International has a net margin of 0.71% compared to Ternium SA's net margin of 6.57%. Ternium SA's return on equity of 0.47% beat Flexible Solutions International's return on equity of 10.76%.

Ternium SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 53.83%. On the other hand Flexible Solutions International has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 54.93%. Given that Flexible Solutions International has higher upside potential than Ternium SA, analysts believe Flexible Solutions International is more attractive than Ternium SA.

Ternium SA has a beta of 1.673, which suggesting that the stock is 67.291% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexible Solutions International has a beta of 1.487, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.687%.

Ternium SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.77%. Flexible Solutions International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Ternium SA pays 84.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International pays out 22.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ternium SA quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are larger than Flexible Solutions International quarterly revenues of $9.3M. Ternium SA's net income of $31.7M is higher than Flexible Solutions International's net income of $611.9K. Notably, Ternium SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.20x while Flexible Solutions International's PE ratio is 10.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ternium SA is 0.30x versus 1.15x for Flexible Solutions International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ArcelorMittal SA has a net margin of 0.71% compared to Ternium SA's net margin of 1.89%. Ternium SA's return on equity of 0.47% beat ArcelorMittal SA's return on equity of -2.22%.

Ternium SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 53.83%. On the other hand ArcelorMittal SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 33.28%. Given that Ternium SA has higher upside potential than ArcelorMittal SA, analysts believe Ternium SA is more attractive than ArcelorMittal SA.

Ternium SA has a beta of 1.673, which suggesting that the stock is 67.291% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ArcelorMittal SA has a beta of 1.744, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.417%.

Ternium SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.77%. ArcelorMittal SA offers a yield of 2.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Ternium SA pays 84.21% of its earnings as a dividend. ArcelorMittal SA pays out 40.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ternium SA quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are smaller than ArcelorMittal SA quarterly revenues of $15.2B. Ternium SA's net income of $31.7M is lower than ArcelorMittal SA's net income of $287M. Notably, Ternium SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.20x while ArcelorMittal SA's PE ratio is 28.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ternium SA is 0.30x versus 0.30x for ArcelorMittal SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nexa Resources SA has a net margin of 0.71% compared to Ternium SA's net margin of -0.73%. Ternium SA's return on equity of 0.47% beat Nexa Resources SA's return on equity of -14.23%.

Ternium SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 53.83%. On the other hand Nexa Resources SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -4.68%. Given that Ternium SA has higher upside potential than Nexa Resources SA, analysts believe Ternium SA is more attractive than Nexa Resources SA.

Ternium SA has a beta of 1.673, which suggesting that the stock is 67.291% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nexa Resources SA has a beta of 1.521, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.118%.

Ternium SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.77%. Nexa Resources SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ternium SA pays 84.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Nexa Resources SA pays out -8.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Ternium SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ternium SA quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are larger than Nexa Resources SA quarterly revenues of $709.5M. Ternium SA's net income of $31.7M is higher than Nexa Resources SA's net income of -$5.2M. Notably, Ternium SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.20x while Nexa Resources SA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ternium SA is 0.30x versus 0.41x for Nexa Resources SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.