Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
49
TSI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$4.68
Seasonality move
:
0.48%
Day range:
$4.70 - $4.76
52-week range:
$4.58 - $5.06
Dividend yield:
6.41%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
626.7K
Avg. volume:
169.2K
1-year change:
-2.87%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TSI
TCW Strategic Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FPF
First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred & Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GUG
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JOJO
ATAC Credit Rotation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PDT
John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TSI
TCW Strategic Income Fund
|
$4.73 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 6.41% | -- |
|
FPF
First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred & Income Fund
|
$19.05 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 8.66% | -- |
|
GUG
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund
|
$16.22 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 8.79% | -- |
|
JOJO
ATAC Credit Rotation ETF
|
$16.07 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 4.8% | -- |
|
PDT
John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund
|
$13.45 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 7.36% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TSI
TCW Strategic Income Fund
|
-- | -0.039 | -- | -- |
|
FPF
First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred & Income Fund
|
-- | 0.501 | -- | -- |
|
GUG
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund
|
-- | 0.392 | -- | -- |
|
JOJO
ATAC Credit Rotation ETF
|
-- | 0.182 | -- | -- |
|
PDT
John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund
|
-- | 0.183 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TSI
TCW Strategic Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FPF
First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred & Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GUG
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JOJO
ATAC Credit Rotation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PDT
John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
TCW Strategic Income Fund vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TSI or FPF?
First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred & Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to TCW Strategic Income Fund's net margin of --. TCW Strategic Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred & Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSITCW Strategic Income Fund-- -- -- FPFFirst Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred & Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TSI or FPF?
TCW Strategic Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred & Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TCW Strategic Income Fund has higher upside potential than First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred & Income Fund, analysts believe TCW Strategic Income Fund is more attractive than First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred & Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSITCW Strategic Income Fund0 0 0 FPFFirst Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred & Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is TSI or FPF More Risky?
TCW Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.283, which suggesting that the stock is 71.729% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred & Income Fund has a beta of 0.845, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.472%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSI or FPF?
TCW Strategic Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.41%. First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred & Income Fund offers a yield of 8.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. TCW Strategic Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred & Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSI or FPF?
TCW Strategic Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred & Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. TCW Strategic Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred & Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, TCW Strategic Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred & Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TCW Strategic Income Fund is -- versus -- for First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred & Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSITCW Strategic Income Fund-- -- -- -- FPFFirst Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred & Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TSI or GUG?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a net margin of -- compared to TCW Strategic Income Fund's net margin of --. TCW Strategic Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSITCW Strategic Income Fund-- -- -- GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TSI or GUG?
TCW Strategic Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TCW Strategic Income Fund has higher upside potential than Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund, analysts believe TCW Strategic Income Fund is more attractive than Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSITCW Strategic Income Fund0 0 0 GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund0 0 0 -
Is TSI or GUG More Risky?
TCW Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.283, which suggesting that the stock is 71.729% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSI or GUG?
TCW Strategic Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.41%. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund offers a yield of 8.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. TCW Strategic Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSI or GUG?
TCW Strategic Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund quarterly revenues of --. TCW Strategic Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's net income of --. Notably, TCW Strategic Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TCW Strategic Income Fund is -- versus -- for Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSITCW Strategic Income Fund-- -- -- -- GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TSI or JOJO?
ATAC Credit Rotation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to TCW Strategic Income Fund's net margin of --. TCW Strategic Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat ATAC Credit Rotation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSITCW Strategic Income Fund-- -- -- JOJOATAC Credit Rotation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TSI or JOJO?
TCW Strategic Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ATAC Credit Rotation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TCW Strategic Income Fund has higher upside potential than ATAC Credit Rotation ETF, analysts believe TCW Strategic Income Fund is more attractive than ATAC Credit Rotation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSITCW Strategic Income Fund0 0 0 JOJOATAC Credit Rotation ETF0 0 0 -
Is TSI or JOJO More Risky?
TCW Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.283, which suggesting that the stock is 71.729% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ATAC Credit Rotation ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSI or JOJO?
TCW Strategic Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.41%. ATAC Credit Rotation ETF offers a yield of 4.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. TCW Strategic Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ATAC Credit Rotation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSI or JOJO?
TCW Strategic Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ATAC Credit Rotation ETF quarterly revenues of --. TCW Strategic Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than ATAC Credit Rotation ETF's net income of --. Notably, TCW Strategic Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ATAC Credit Rotation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TCW Strategic Income Fund is -- versus -- for ATAC Credit Rotation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSITCW Strategic Income Fund-- -- -- -- JOJOATAC Credit Rotation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TSI or PDT?
John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund has a net margin of -- compared to TCW Strategic Income Fund's net margin of --. TCW Strategic Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSITCW Strategic Income Fund-- -- -- PDTJohn Hancock Premium Dividend Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TSI or PDT?
TCW Strategic Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TCW Strategic Income Fund has higher upside potential than John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund, analysts believe TCW Strategic Income Fund is more attractive than John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSITCW Strategic Income Fund0 0 0 PDTJohn Hancock Premium Dividend Fund0 0 0 -
Is TSI or PDT More Risky?
TCW Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.283, which suggesting that the stock is 71.729% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund has a beta of 0.803, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.725%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSI or PDT?
TCW Strategic Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.41%. John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund offers a yield of 7.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. TCW Strategic Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSI or PDT?
TCW Strategic Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund quarterly revenues of --. TCW Strategic Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund's net income of --. Notably, TCW Strategic Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TCW Strategic Income Fund is -- versus -- for John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSITCW Strategic Income Fund-- -- -- -- PDTJohn Hancock Premium Dividend Fund-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Sell
43
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
44
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
77
CPS alert for Feb 17
Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc. [CPS] is down 2.72% over the past day.
Buy
58
TPH alert for Feb 17
Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. [TPH] is down 0.24% over the past day.
Sell
20
IRON alert for Feb 17
Disc Medicine, Inc. [IRON] is up 12.53% over the past day.
