Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
27
GUG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$14.93
Seasonality move
:
-4.09%
Day range:
$14.92 - $15.23
52-week range:
$13.93 - $16.88
Dividend yield:
6.35%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
123.4K
Avg. volume:
96.1K
1-year change:
6.84%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GUG
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHI
CALAMOS CONVERTIBLE OPPORTUNITIES & INCOME FUND
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHY
Calamos Convertible & High Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HPF
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PDT
John Hancock Premium Div Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSI
Tcw Strategic Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GUG
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund
|
$15.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 6.35% | -- |
|
CHI
CALAMOS CONVERTIBLE OPPORTUNITIES & INCOME FUND
|
$12.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 0% | -- |
|
CHY
Calamos Convertible & High Income Fund
|
$12.14 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 0% | -- |
|
HPF
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II
|
$16.29 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 5.07% | -- |
|
PDT
John Hancock Premium Div Fund
|
$12.25 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 4.7% | -- |
|
TSI
Tcw Strategic Income Fund
|
$5.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 4.8% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GUG
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund
|
-- | 0.507 | -- | -- |
|
CHI
CALAMOS CONVERTIBLE OPPORTUNITIES & INCOME FUND
|
-- | 0.941 | -- | -- |
|
CHY
Calamos Convertible & High Income Fund
|
-- | 0.635 | -- | -- |
|
HPF
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II
|
-- | 0.191 | -- | -- |
|
PDT
John Hancock Premium Div Fund
|
-- | 0.659 | -- | -- |
|
TSI
Tcw Strategic Income Fund
|
-- | 0.511 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GUG
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHI
CALAMOS CONVERTIBLE OPPORTUNITIES & INCOME FUND
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHY
Calamos Convertible & High Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HPF
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PDT
John Hancock Premium Div Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSI
Tcw Strategic Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GUG or CHI?
CALAMOS CONVERTIBLE OPPORTUNITIES & INCOME FUND has a net margin of -- compared to Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's net margin of --. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's return on equity of -- beat CALAMOS CONVERTIBLE OPPORTUNITIES & INCOME FUND's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund-- -- -- CHICALAMOS CONVERTIBLE OPPORTUNITIES & INCOME FUND-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GUG or CHI?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CALAMOS CONVERTIBLE OPPORTUNITIES & INCOME FUND has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has higher upside potential than CALAMOS CONVERTIBLE OPPORTUNITIES & INCOME FUND, analysts believe Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund is more attractive than CALAMOS CONVERTIBLE OPPORTUNITIES & INCOME FUND.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund0 0 0 CHICALAMOS CONVERTIBLE OPPORTUNITIES & INCOME FUND0 0 0 -
Is GUG or CHI More Risky?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CALAMOS CONVERTIBLE OPPORTUNITIES & INCOME FUND has a beta of 1.166, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.557%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GUG or CHI?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.35%. CALAMOS CONVERTIBLE OPPORTUNITIES & INCOME FUND offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CALAMOS CONVERTIBLE OPPORTUNITIES & INCOME FUND pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GUG or CHI?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CALAMOS CONVERTIBLE OPPORTUNITIES & INCOME FUND quarterly revenues of --. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's net income of -- is lower than CALAMOS CONVERTIBLE OPPORTUNITIES & INCOME FUND's net income of --. Notably, Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CALAMOS CONVERTIBLE OPPORTUNITIES & INCOME FUND's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund is -- versus -- for CALAMOS CONVERTIBLE OPPORTUNITIES & INCOME FUND. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund-- -- -- -- CHICALAMOS CONVERTIBLE OPPORTUNITIES & INCOME FUND-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GUG or CHY?
Calamos Convertible & High Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's net margin of --. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's return on equity of -- beat Calamos Convertible & High Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund-- -- -- CHYCalamos Convertible & High Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GUG or CHY?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Calamos Convertible & High Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has higher upside potential than Calamos Convertible & High Income Fund, analysts believe Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund is more attractive than Calamos Convertible & High Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund0 0 0 CHYCalamos Convertible & High Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is GUG or CHY More Risky?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Calamos Convertible & High Income Fund has a beta of 1.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.117%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GUG or CHY?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.35%. Calamos Convertible & High Income Fund offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Calamos Convertible & High Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GUG or CHY?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Calamos Convertible & High Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's net income of -- is lower than Calamos Convertible & High Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Calamos Convertible & High Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund is -- versus -- for Calamos Convertible & High Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund-- -- -- -- CHYCalamos Convertible & High Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GUG or HPF?
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II has a net margin of -- compared to Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's net margin of --. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's return on equity of -- beat John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund-- -- -- HPFJohn Hancock Preferred Income Fund II-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GUG or HPF?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has higher upside potential than John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II, analysts believe Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund is more attractive than John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund0 0 0 HPFJohn Hancock Preferred Income Fund II0 0 0 -
Is GUG or HPF More Risky?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II has a beta of 0.897, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.344%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GUG or HPF?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.35%. John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II offers a yield of 5.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GUG or HPF?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II quarterly revenues of --. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's net income of -- is lower than John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II's net income of --. Notably, Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund is -- versus -- for John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund-- -- -- -- HPFJohn Hancock Preferred Income Fund II-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GUG or PDT?
John Hancock Premium Div Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's net margin of --. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's return on equity of -- beat John Hancock Premium Div Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund-- -- -- PDTJohn Hancock Premium Div Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GUG or PDT?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand John Hancock Premium Div Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has higher upside potential than John Hancock Premium Div Fund, analysts believe Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund is more attractive than John Hancock Premium Div Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund0 0 0 PDTJohn Hancock Premium Div Fund0 0 0 -
Is GUG or PDT More Risky?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison John Hancock Premium Div Fund has a beta of 0.969, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.067%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GUG or PDT?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.35%. John Hancock Premium Div Fund offers a yield of 4.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. John Hancock Premium Div Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GUG or PDT?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than John Hancock Premium Div Fund quarterly revenues of --. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's net income of -- is lower than John Hancock Premium Div Fund's net income of --. Notably, Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while John Hancock Premium Div Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund is -- versus -- for John Hancock Premium Div Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund-- -- -- -- PDTJohn Hancock Premium Div Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GUG or TSI?
Tcw Strategic Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's net margin of --. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's return on equity of -- beat Tcw Strategic Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund-- -- -- TSITcw Strategic Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GUG or TSI?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tcw Strategic Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has higher upside potential than Tcw Strategic Income Fund, analysts believe Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund is more attractive than Tcw Strategic Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund0 0 0 TSITcw Strategic Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is GUG or TSI More Risky?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tcw Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.356, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.427%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GUG or TSI?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.35%. Tcw Strategic Income Fund offers a yield of 4.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tcw Strategic Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GUG or TSI?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tcw Strategic Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's net income of -- is lower than Tcw Strategic Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tcw Strategic Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund is -- versus -- for Tcw Strategic Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund-- -- -- -- TSITcw Strategic Income Fund-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
