Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Buy
60
GUG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$15.54
Seasonality move
:
3.19%
Day range:
$15.35 - $15.65
52-week range:
$13.90 - $16.50
Dividend yield:
9.19%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
90.8K
Avg. volume:
80.2K
1-year change:
-1.15%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GUG
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSQ
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FFC
Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Securities Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLC
Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OPP
RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic opportunity fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSI
TCW Strategic Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GUG
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund
|
$15.50 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 9.19% | -- |
|
CSQ
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund
|
$19.22 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 6.4% | -- |
|
FFC
Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Securities Fund
|
$16.63 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 6.78% | -- |
|
FLC
Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund
|
$17.45 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 6.58% | -- |
|
OPP
RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic opportunity fund
|
$8.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 14.32% | -- |
|
TSI
TCW Strategic Income Fund
|
$4.91 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 5.19% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GUG
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund
|
-- | 0.559 | -- | -- |
|
CSQ
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund
|
-- | 1.201 | -- | -- |
|
FFC
Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Securities Fund
|
-- | 0.504 | -- | -- |
|
FLC
Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund
|
-- | 0.390 | -- | -- |
|
OPP
RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic opportunity fund
|
-- | 0.210 | -- | -- |
|
TSI
TCW Strategic Income Fund
|
-- | -0.004 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GUG
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSQ
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FFC
Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Securities Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLC
Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OPP
RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic opportunity fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSI
TCW Strategic Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GUG or CSQ?
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's net margin of --. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's return on equity of -- beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund-- -- -- CSQCalamos Strategic Total Return Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GUG or CSQ?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has higher upside potential than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund, analysts believe Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund is more attractive than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund0 0 0 CSQCalamos Strategic Total Return Fund0 0 0 -
Is GUG or CSQ More Risky?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund has a beta of 1.297, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.714%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GUG or CSQ?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.19%. Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund offers a yield of 6.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GUG or CSQ?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund quarterly revenues of --. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's net income of -- is lower than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's net income of --. Notably, Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund is -- versus -- for Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund-- -- -- -- CSQCalamos Strategic Total Return Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GUG or FFC?
Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Securities Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's net margin of --. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's return on equity of -- beat Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Securities Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund-- -- -- FFCFlaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Securities Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GUG or FFC?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Securities Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has higher upside potential than Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Securities Fund, analysts believe Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund is more attractive than Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Securities Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund0 0 0 FFCFlaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Securities Fund0 0 0 -
Is GUG or FFC More Risky?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Securities Fund has a beta of 0.797, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.266%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GUG or FFC?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.19%. Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Securities Fund offers a yield of 6.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Securities Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GUG or FFC?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Securities Fund quarterly revenues of --. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's net income of -- is lower than Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Securities Fund's net income of --. Notably, Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Securities Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund is -- versus -- for Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Securities Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund-- -- -- -- FFCFlaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Securities Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GUG or FLC?
Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's net margin of --. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's return on equity of -- beat Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund-- -- -- FLCFlaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GUG or FLC?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has higher upside potential than Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund, analysts believe Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund is more attractive than Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund0 0 0 FLCFlaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund0 0 0 -
Is GUG or FLC More Risky?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund has a beta of 0.681, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.885%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GUG or FLC?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.19%. Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund offers a yield of 6.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GUG or FLC?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund quarterly revenues of --. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's net income of -- is lower than Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund's net income of --. Notably, Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund is -- versus -- for Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund-- -- -- -- FLCFlaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GUG or OPP?
RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic opportunity fund has a net margin of -- compared to Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's net margin of --. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's return on equity of -- beat RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic opportunity fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund-- -- -- OPPRiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic opportunity fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GUG or OPP?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic opportunity fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has higher upside potential than RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic opportunity fund, analysts believe Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund is more attractive than RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic opportunity fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund0 0 0 OPPRiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic opportunity fund0 0 0 -
Is GUG or OPP More Risky?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic opportunity fund has a beta of 0.633, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.678%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GUG or OPP?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.19%. RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic opportunity fund offers a yield of 14.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic opportunity fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GUG or OPP?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic opportunity fund quarterly revenues of --. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's net income of -- is lower than RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic opportunity fund's net income of --. Notably, Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic opportunity fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund is -- versus -- for RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic opportunity fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund-- -- -- -- OPPRiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic opportunity fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GUG or TSI?
TCW Strategic Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's net margin of --. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's return on equity of -- beat TCW Strategic Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund-- -- -- TSITCW Strategic Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GUG or TSI?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TCW Strategic Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has higher upside potential than TCW Strategic Income Fund, analysts believe Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund is more attractive than TCW Strategic Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund0 0 0 TSITCW Strategic Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is GUG or TSI More Risky?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TCW Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.289, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.147%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GUG or TSI?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.19%. TCW Strategic Income Fund offers a yield of 5.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TCW Strategic Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GUG or TSI?
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TCW Strategic Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's net income of -- is lower than TCW Strategic Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TCW Strategic Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund is -- versus -- for TCW Strategic Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GUGGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund-- -- -- -- TSITCW Strategic Income Fund-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
54
SMX alert for Dec 5
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 176.02% over the past day.
Sell
15
HOV alert for Dec 5
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is up 0.38% over the past day.
Buy
67
NUTX alert for Dec 5
Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is up 1.81% over the past day.
