TSE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Core Molding Technologies has a net margin of -10.06% compared to Trinseo PLC's net margin of 4.33%. Trinseo PLC's return on equity of -- beat Core Molding Technologies's return on equity of 10.91%.

Trinseo PLC has a consensus price target of $4.88, signalling upside risk potential of 6.44%. On the other hand Core Molding Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 53.75%. Given that Core Molding Technologies has higher upside potential than Trinseo PLC, analysts believe Core Molding Technologies is more attractive than Trinseo PLC.

Trinseo PLC has a beta of 1.570, which suggesting that the stock is 56.96% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Molding Technologies has a beta of 1.764, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.372%.

Trinseo PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Core Molding Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trinseo PLC pays -2.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Molding Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trinseo PLC quarterly revenues are $867.7M, which are larger than Core Molding Technologies quarterly revenues of $73M. Trinseo PLC's net income of -$87.3M is lower than Core Molding Technologies's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Trinseo PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Core Molding Technologies's PE ratio is 8.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinseo PLC is 0.05x versus 0.44x for Core Molding Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Green Plains has a net margin of -10.06% compared to Trinseo PLC's net margin of 7.32%. Trinseo PLC's return on equity of -- beat Green Plains's return on equity of -2.17%.

Trinseo PLC has a consensus price target of $4.88, signalling upside risk potential of 6.44%. On the other hand Green Plains has an analysts' consensus of $20.69 which suggests that it could grow by 106.05%. Given that Green Plains has higher upside potential than Trinseo PLC, analysts believe Green Plains is more attractive than Trinseo PLC.

Trinseo PLC has a beta of 1.570, which suggesting that the stock is 56.96% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Plains has a beta of 1.463, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.309%.

Trinseo PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Green Plains offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trinseo PLC pays -2.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Green Plains pays out -24.34% of its earnings as a dividend.

Trinseo PLC quarterly revenues are $867.7M, which are larger than Green Plains quarterly revenues of $658.7M. Trinseo PLC's net income of -$87.3M is lower than Green Plains's net income of $48.2M. Notably, Trinseo PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Green Plains's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinseo PLC is 0.05x versus 0.25x for Green Plains. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lightwave Logic has a net margin of -10.06% compared to Trinseo PLC's net margin of -23131.93%. Trinseo PLC's return on equity of -- beat Lightwave Logic's return on equity of -61.58%.

Trinseo PLC has a consensus price target of $4.88, signalling upside risk potential of 6.44%. On the other hand Lightwave Logic has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Trinseo PLC has higher upside potential than Lightwave Logic, analysts believe Trinseo PLC is more attractive than Lightwave Logic.

Trinseo PLC has a beta of 1.570, which suggesting that the stock is 56.96% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lightwave Logic has a beta of 2.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.376%.

Trinseo PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Lightwave Logic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trinseo PLC pays -2.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Lightwave Logic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trinseo PLC quarterly revenues are $867.7M, which are larger than Lightwave Logic quarterly revenues of $22.9K. Trinseo PLC's net income of -$87.3M is lower than Lightwave Logic's net income of -$5.3M. Notably, Trinseo PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lightwave Logic's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinseo PLC is 0.05x versus 2,497.95x for Lightwave Logic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith-Midland has a net margin of -10.06% compared to Trinseo PLC's net margin of 13.36%. Trinseo PLC's return on equity of -- beat Smith-Midland's return on equity of 18%.

Trinseo PLC has a consensus price target of $4.88, signalling upside risk potential of 6.44%. On the other hand Smith-Midland has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Trinseo PLC has higher upside potential than Smith-Midland, analysts believe Trinseo PLC is more attractive than Smith-Midland.

Trinseo PLC has a beta of 1.570, which suggesting that the stock is 56.96% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith-Midland has a beta of 1.397, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.735%.

Trinseo PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Smith-Midland offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trinseo PLC pays -2.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith-Midland pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trinseo PLC quarterly revenues are $867.7M, which are larger than Smith-Midland quarterly revenues of $23.6M. Trinseo PLC's net income of -$87.3M is lower than Smith-Midland's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Trinseo PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Smith-Midland's PE ratio is 34.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinseo PLC is 0.05x versus 2.93x for Smith-Midland. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.