TPR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Caleres has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Tapestry's net margin of 0.77%. Tapestry's return on equity of 31.45% beat Caleres's return on equity of 18.05%.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $83.85, signalling upside risk potential of 14.38%. On the other hand Caleres has an analysts' consensus of $21.00 which suggests that it could grow by 40.75%. Given that Caleres has higher upside potential than Tapestry, analysts believe Caleres is more attractive than Tapestry.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.413, which suggesting that the stock is 41.287% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caleres has a beta of 1.109, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.922%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Caleres offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Caleres pays out 9.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Caleres quarterly revenues of $639.2M. Tapestry's net income of $310.4M is higher than Caleres's net income of $4.9M. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.25x while Caleres's PE ratio is 4.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.51x versus 0.18x for Caleres. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ford Motor has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Tapestry's net margin of 1.16%. Tapestry's return on equity of 31.45% beat Ford Motor's return on equity of 11.39%.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $83.85, signalling upside risk potential of 14.38%. On the other hand Ford Motor has an analysts' consensus of $10.13 which suggests that it could fall by -1.48%. Given that Tapestry has higher upside potential than Ford Motor, analysts believe Tapestry is more attractive than Ford Motor.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.413, which suggesting that the stock is 41.287% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ford Motor has a beta of 1.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.867%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Ford Motor offers a yield of 7.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor pays out 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Ford Motor quarterly revenues of $40.7B. Tapestry's net income of $310.4M is lower than Ford Motor's net income of $471M. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.25x while Ford Motor's PE ratio is 8.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.51x versus 0.23x for Ford Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Tapestry's net margin of -4.88%. Tapestry's return on equity of 31.45% beat Mattel's return on equity of 24.74%.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $83.85, signalling upside risk potential of 14.38%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $23.73 which suggests that it could grow by 36.14%. Given that Mattel has higher upside potential than Tapestry, analysts believe Mattel is more attractive than Tapestry.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.413, which suggesting that the stock is 41.287% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.613, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.658%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tapestry's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Mattel quarterly revenues of $826.6M. Tapestry's net income of $310.4M is higher than Mattel's net income of -$40.3M. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.25x while Mattel's PE ratio is 11.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.51x versus 1.09x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of 14.14% compared to Tapestry's net margin of 13.88%. Tapestry's return on equity of 31.45% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 28.48%.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $83.85, signalling upside risk potential of 14.38%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $269.84 which suggests that it could grow by 12.26%. Given that Tapestry has higher upside potential than Ralph Lauren, analysts believe Tapestry is more attractive than Ralph Lauren.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.413, which suggesting that the stock is 41.287% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.445, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.509%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 30.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Tapestry's net income of $310.4M is higher than Ralph Lauren's net income of $297.4M. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.25x while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 21.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.51x versus 2.23x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.