TPR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Deckers Outdoor has a net margin of 12.38% compared to Tapestry's net margin of 18.48%. Tapestry's return on equity of 29.41% beat Deckers Outdoor's return on equity of 42.48%.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $65.04, signalling upside risk potential of 1.39%. On the other hand Deckers Outdoor has an analysts' consensus of $198.63 which suggests that it could fall by -5.85%. Given that Tapestry has higher upside potential than Deckers Outdoor, analysts believe Tapestry is more attractive than Deckers Outdoor.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.604, which suggesting that the stock is 60.411% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deckers Outdoor has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.394%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. Deckers Outdoor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Deckers Outdoor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tapestry's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Deckers Outdoor quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Tapestry's net income of $186.6M is lower than Deckers Outdoor's net income of $242.3M. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.54x while Deckers Outdoor's PE ratio is 37.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.25x versus 6.98x for Deckers Outdoor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ford Motor has a net margin of 12.38% compared to Tapestry's net margin of 1.93%. Tapestry's return on equity of 29.41% beat Ford Motor's return on equity of 8.1%.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $65.04, signalling upside risk potential of 1.39%. On the other hand Ford Motor has an analysts' consensus of $11.91 which suggests that it could grow by 20.51%. Given that Ford Motor has higher upside potential than Tapestry, analysts believe Ford Motor is more attractive than Tapestry.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.604, which suggesting that the stock is 60.411% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ford Motor has a beta of 1.623, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.313%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. Ford Motor offers a yield of 6.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor pays out 114.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Tapestry's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Ford Motor's is not.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Ford Motor quarterly revenues of $46.2B. Tapestry's net income of $186.6M is lower than Ford Motor's net income of $892M. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.54x while Ford Motor's PE ratio is 11.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.25x versus 0.22x for Ford Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 12.38% compared to Tapestry's net margin of -125.86%. Tapestry's return on equity of 29.41% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -68.23%.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $65.04, signalling upside risk potential of 1.39%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $15.03 which suggests that it could grow by 8.7%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Tapestry, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Tapestry.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.604, which suggesting that the stock is 60.411% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tapestry's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $874M. Tapestry's net income of $186.6M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$1.1B. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.54x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.25x versus 3.00x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 12.38% compared to Tapestry's net margin of 8.61%. Tapestry's return on equity of 29.41% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Tapestry has a consensus price target of $65.04, signalling upside risk potential of 1.39%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $283.88 which suggests that it could fall by -32.58%. Given that Tapestry has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Tapestry is more attractive than Tesla.

Tapestry has a beta of 1.604, which suggesting that the stock is 60.411% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.098%.

Tapestry has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tapestry pays 39.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tapestry's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tapestry quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Tapestry's net income of $186.6M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Tapestry's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.54x while Tesla's PE ratio is 115.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tapestry is 2.25x versus 15.13x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.