SN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co. has a net margin of 12.15% compared to SharkNinja, Inc.'s net margin of 8.71%. SharkNinja, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.13% beat Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co.'s return on equity of 15.75%.

SharkNinja, Inc. has a consensus price target of $149.74, signalling upside risk potential of 43.45%. On the other hand Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -28.88%. Given that SharkNinja, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co., analysts believe SharkNinja, Inc. is more attractive than Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co..

SharkNinja, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co. has a beta of 0.194, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.638%.

SharkNinja, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co. offers a yield of 2.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. SharkNinja, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co. pays out 24.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SharkNinja, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co. quarterly revenues of $212.9M. SharkNinja, Inc.'s net income of $255.2M is higher than Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co.'s net income of $18.5M. Notably, SharkNinja, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.73x while Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co.'s PE ratio is 9.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SharkNinja, Inc. is 2.27x versus 0.40x for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingsway Financial Services, Inc. has a net margin of 12.15% compared to SharkNinja, Inc.'s net margin of -4.06%. SharkNinja, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.13% beat Kingsway Financial Services, Inc.'s return on equity of -35.2%.

SharkNinja, Inc. has a consensus price target of $149.74, signalling upside risk potential of 43.45%. On the other hand Kingsway Financial Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -61.87%. Given that SharkNinja, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, Inc., analysts believe SharkNinja, Inc. is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services, Inc..

SharkNinja, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsway Financial Services, Inc. has a beta of 0.297, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.289%.

SharkNinja, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kingsway Financial Services, Inc. offers a yield of 6.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SharkNinja, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsway Financial Services, Inc. pays out 0.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsway Financial Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SharkNinja, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Kingsway Financial Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $39M. SharkNinja, Inc.'s net income of $255.2M is higher than Kingsway Financial Services, Inc.'s net income of -$1.6M. Notably, SharkNinja, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.73x while Kingsway Financial Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SharkNinja, Inc. is 2.27x versus 2.15x for Kingsway Financial Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarMax, Inc. has a net margin of 12.15% compared to SharkNinja, Inc.'s net margin of 1%. SharkNinja, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.13% beat CarMax, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.38%.

SharkNinja, Inc. has a consensus price target of $149.74, signalling upside risk potential of 43.45%. On the other hand CarMax, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $40.42 which suggests that it could fall by -2.78%. Given that SharkNinja, Inc. has higher upside potential than CarMax, Inc., analysts believe SharkNinja, Inc. is more attractive than CarMax, Inc..

SharkNinja, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarMax, Inc. has a beta of 1.299, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.924%.

SharkNinja, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarMax, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SharkNinja, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CarMax, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SharkNinja, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than CarMax, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.2B. SharkNinja, Inc.'s net income of $255.2M is higher than CarMax, Inc.'s net income of $62.2M. Notably, SharkNinja, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.73x while CarMax, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SharkNinja, Inc. is 2.27x versus 0.23x for CarMax, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.