SN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Group 1 Automotive, Inc. has a net margin of 12.15% compared to SharkNinja, Inc.'s net margin of 0.76%. SharkNinja, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.13% beat Group 1 Automotive, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.7%.

SharkNinja, Inc. has a consensus price target of $149.74, signalling upside risk potential of 14.62%. On the other hand Group 1 Automotive, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $454.11 which suggests that it could grow by 32.67%. Given that Group 1 Automotive, Inc. has higher upside potential than SharkNinja, Inc., analysts believe Group 1 Automotive, Inc. is more attractive than SharkNinja, Inc..

SharkNinja, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Group 1 Automotive, Inc. has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.798%.

SharkNinja, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Group 1 Automotive, Inc. offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. SharkNinja, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive, Inc. pays out 7.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Group 1 Automotive, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SharkNinja, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Group 1 Automotive, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5.6B. SharkNinja, Inc.'s net income of $255.2M is higher than Group 1 Automotive, Inc.'s net income of $42.5M. Notably, SharkNinja, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.44x while Group 1 Automotive, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SharkNinja, Inc. is 2.90x versus 0.19x for Group 1 Automotive, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co. has a net margin of 12.15% compared to SharkNinja, Inc.'s net margin of 1.25%. SharkNinja, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.13% beat Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co.'s return on equity of 19.77%.

SharkNinja, Inc. has a consensus price target of $149.74, signalling upside risk potential of 14.62%. On the other hand Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -33.81%. Given that SharkNinja, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co., analysts believe SharkNinja, Inc. is more attractive than Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co..

SharkNinja, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co. has a beta of 0.184, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.616%.

SharkNinja, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co. offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. SharkNinja, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co. pays out 20.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SharkNinja, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co. quarterly revenues of $132.8M. SharkNinja, Inc.'s net income of $255.2M is higher than Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co.'s net income of $1.7M. Notably, SharkNinja, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.44x while Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co.'s PE ratio is 8.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SharkNinja, Inc. is 2.90x versus 0.44x for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarMax, Inc. has a net margin of 12.15% compared to SharkNinja, Inc.'s net margin of 1%. SharkNinja, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.13% beat CarMax, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.38%.

SharkNinja, Inc. has a consensus price target of $149.74, signalling upside risk potential of 14.62%. On the other hand CarMax, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $39.62 which suggests that it could fall by -10.98%. Given that SharkNinja, Inc. has higher upside potential than CarMax, Inc., analysts believe SharkNinja, Inc. is more attractive than CarMax, Inc..

SharkNinja, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarMax, Inc. has a beta of 1.354, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.39%.

SharkNinja, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarMax, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SharkNinja, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CarMax, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SharkNinja, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than CarMax, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.2B. SharkNinja, Inc.'s net income of $255.2M is higher than CarMax, Inc.'s net income of $62.2M. Notably, SharkNinja, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.44x while CarMax, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SharkNinja, Inc. is 2.90x versus 0.25x for CarMax, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.