SLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Corebridge Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 9.18% compared to Sun Life Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 2.72%. Sun Life Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.21% beat Corebridge Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.71%.

Sun Life Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $62.04, signalling downside risk potential of -4.86%. On the other hand Corebridge Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $37.69 which suggests that it could grow by 20.96%. Given that Corebridge Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sun Life Financial, Inc., analysts believe Corebridge Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Sun Life Financial, Inc..

Sun Life Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.886, which suggesting that the stock is 11.432% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Corebridge Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sun Life Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Corebridge Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 3.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Sun Life Financial, Inc. pays 61.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Corebridge Financial, Inc. pays out 24.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sun Life Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $9B, which are larger than Corebridge Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5B. Sun Life Financial, Inc.'s net income of $827.7M is higher than Corebridge Financial, Inc.'s net income of $137M. Notably, Sun Life Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.34x while Corebridge Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sun Life Financial, Inc. is 1.26x versus 0.95x for Corebridge Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pineapple Financial has a net margin of 9.18% compared to Sun Life Financial, Inc.'s net margin of -13.04%. Sun Life Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.21% beat Pineapple Financial's return on equity of -232.14%.

Sun Life Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $62.04, signalling downside risk potential of -4.86%. On the other hand Pineapple Financial has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5747.95%. Given that Pineapple Financial has higher upside potential than Sun Life Financial, Inc., analysts believe Pineapple Financial is more attractive than Sun Life Financial, Inc..

Sun Life Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.886, which suggesting that the stock is 11.432% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pineapple Financial has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sun Life Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Pineapple Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sun Life Financial, Inc. pays 61.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Pineapple Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Life Financial, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sun Life Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $9B, which are larger than Pineapple Financial quarterly revenues of $4.6M. Sun Life Financial, Inc.'s net income of $827.7M is higher than Pineapple Financial's net income of -$595.5K. Notably, Sun Life Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.34x while Pineapple Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sun Life Financial, Inc. is 1.26x versus 0.03x for Pineapple Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Primerica, Inc. has a net margin of 9.18% compared to Sun Life Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 24.13%. Sun Life Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.21% beat Primerica, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.48%.

Sun Life Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $62.04, signalling downside risk potential of -4.86%. On the other hand Primerica, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $298.50 which suggests that it could grow by 8.2%. Given that Primerica, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sun Life Financial, Inc., analysts believe Primerica, Inc. is more attractive than Sun Life Financial, Inc..

Sun Life Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.886, which suggesting that the stock is 11.432% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Primerica, Inc. has a beta of 0.912, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.774%.

Sun Life Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Primerica, Inc. offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Sun Life Financial, Inc. pays 61.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Primerica, Inc. pays out 24.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sun Life Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $9B, which are larger than Primerica, Inc. quarterly revenues of $854.3M. Sun Life Financial, Inc.'s net income of $827.7M is higher than Primerica, Inc.'s net income of $206.1M. Notably, Sun Life Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.34x while Primerica, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sun Life Financial, Inc. is 1.26x versus 2.78x for Primerica, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. has a net margin of 9.18% compared to Sun Life Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 7.34%. Sun Life Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.21% beat Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.72%.

Sun Life Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $62.04, signalling downside risk potential of -4.86%. On the other hand Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $242.67 which suggests that it could grow by 7.14%. Given that Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sun Life Financial, Inc., analysts believe Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. is more attractive than Sun Life Financial, Inc..

Sun Life Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.886, which suggesting that the stock is 11.432% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. has a beta of 0.534, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.594%.

Sun Life Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. Sun Life Financial, Inc. pays 61.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. pays out 20.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sun Life Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $9B, which are larger than Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.3B. Sun Life Financial, Inc.'s net income of $827.7M is higher than Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.'s net income of $465M. Notably, Sun Life Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.34x while Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sun Life Financial, Inc. is 1.26x versus 0.64x for Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.