SII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a net margin of 19.67% compared to Sprott, Inc.'s net margin of 32.75%. Sprott, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.06% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.16%.

Sprott, Inc. has a consensus price target of $95.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.67%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott, Inc. has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc., analysts believe Sprott, Inc. is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc..

Sprott, Inc. has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.019999999999998% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.839, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.053%.

Sprott, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. offers a yield of 5.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.50 per share. Sprott, Inc. pays 57.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. pays out 38.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sprott, Inc. quarterly revenues are $66.9M, which are larger than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $41.4M. Sprott, Inc.'s net income of $13.2M is lower than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net income of $13.6M. Notably, Sprott, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 46.65x while Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott, Inc. is 10.73x versus 2.03x for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 19.67% compared to Sprott, Inc.'s net margin of 43.19%. Sprott, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.06% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 7.18%.

Sprott, Inc. has a consensus price target of $95.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.67%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $12.91 which suggests that it could grow by 5.7%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Sprott, Inc., analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Sprott, Inc..

Sprott, Inc. has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.019999999999998% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.737, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.339%.

Sprott, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 12.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Sprott, Inc. pays 57.82% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 119.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

Sprott, Inc. quarterly revenues are $66.9M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $63.6M. Sprott, Inc.'s net income of $13.2M is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $27.5M. Notably, Sprott, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 46.65x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 11.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott, Inc. is 10.73x versus 4.80x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a net margin of 19.67% compared to Sprott, Inc.'s net margin of 29.17%. Sprott, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.06% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s return on equity of 2.31%.

Sprott, Inc. has a consensus price target of $95.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.67%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.70 which suggests that it could grow by 0.07%. Given that Sprott, Inc. has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp., analysts believe Sprott, Inc. is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp..

Sprott, Inc. has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.019999999999998% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.325%.

Sprott, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. offers a yield of 12.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Sprott, Inc. pays 57.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. pays out 444.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s is not.

Sprott, Inc. quarterly revenues are $66.9M, which are smaller than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. quarterly revenues of $84.3M. Sprott, Inc.'s net income of $13.2M is lower than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s net income of $24.6M. Notably, Sprott, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 46.65x while Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s PE ratio is 35.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott, Inc. is 10.73x versus 3.93x for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pineapple Financial has a net margin of 19.67% compared to Sprott, Inc.'s net margin of -13.04%. Sprott, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.06% beat Pineapple Financial's return on equity of -232.14%.

Sprott, Inc. has a consensus price target of $95.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.67%. On the other hand Pineapple Financial has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5747.95%. Given that Pineapple Financial has higher upside potential than Sprott, Inc., analysts believe Pineapple Financial is more attractive than Sprott, Inc..

Sprott, Inc. has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.019999999999998% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pineapple Financial has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sprott, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. Pineapple Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprott, Inc. pays 57.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Pineapple Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sprott, Inc. quarterly revenues are $66.9M, which are larger than Pineapple Financial quarterly revenues of $4.6M. Sprott, Inc.'s net income of $13.2M is higher than Pineapple Financial's net income of -$595.5K. Notably, Sprott, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 46.65x while Pineapple Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott, Inc. is 10.73x versus 0.03x for Pineapple Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.