SCI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Driven Brands Holdings has a net margin of 11.62% compared to Service Corp International's net margin of -2.53%. Service Corp International's return on equity of 31.88% beat Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of 0.69%.

Service Corp International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.26%. On the other hand Driven Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.76%. Given that Driven Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Service Corp International, analysts believe Driven Brands Holdings is more attractive than Service Corp International.

Service Corp International has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.72% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Service Corp International has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Driven Brands Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Service Corp International pays 31.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Driven Brands Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Service Corp International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Service Corp International quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $591.7M. Service Corp International's net income of $117.8M is higher than Driven Brands Holdings's net income of -$14.9M. Notably, Service Corp International's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.72x while Driven Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 401.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Service Corp International is 2.90x versus 1.10x for Driven Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Frontdoor has a net margin of 11.62% compared to Service Corp International's net margin of 18.48%. Service Corp International's return on equity of 31.88% beat Frontdoor's return on equity of 123.81%.

Service Corp International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.26%. On the other hand Frontdoor has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 0.25%. Given that Service Corp International has higher upside potential than Frontdoor, analysts believe Service Corp International is more attractive than Frontdoor.

Service Corp International has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.72% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Frontdoor has a beta of 1.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.85%.

Service Corp International has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Frontdoor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Service Corp International pays 31.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Frontdoor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Service Corp International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Service Corp International quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Frontdoor quarterly revenues of $541M. Service Corp International's net income of $117.8M is higher than Frontdoor's net income of $100M. Notably, Service Corp International's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.72x while Frontdoor's PE ratio is 18.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Service Corp International is 2.90x versus 2.41x for Frontdoor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patrick Industries has a net margin of 11.62% compared to Service Corp International's net margin of 4.45%. Service Corp International's return on equity of 31.88% beat Patrick Industries's return on equity of 14.42%.

Service Corp International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.26%. On the other hand Patrick Industries has an analysts' consensus of $103.80 which suggests that it could grow by 25.2%. Given that Patrick Industries has higher upside potential than Service Corp International, analysts believe Patrick Industries is more attractive than Service Corp International.

Service Corp International has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.72% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patrick Industries has a beta of 1.627, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.678%.

Service Corp International has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Patrick Industries offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Service Corp International pays 31.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Patrick Industries pays out 29.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Service Corp International quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Patrick Industries quarterly revenues of $919.4M. Service Corp International's net income of $117.8M is higher than Patrick Industries's net income of $40.9M. Notably, Service Corp International's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.72x while Patrick Industries's PE ratio is 17.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Service Corp International is 2.90x versus 0.76x for Patrick Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WW International has a net margin of 11.62% compared to Service Corp International's net margin of -23.95%. Service Corp International's return on equity of 31.88% beat WW International's return on equity of --.

Service Corp International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.26%. On the other hand WW International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -18.88%. Given that Service Corp International has higher upside potential than WW International, analysts believe Service Corp International is more attractive than WW International.

Service Corp International has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.72% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WW International has a beta of 1.726, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.612%.

Service Corp International has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. WW International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Service Corp International pays 31.26% of its earnings as a dividend. WW International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Service Corp International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Service Corp International quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than WW International quarterly revenues of $192.9M. Service Corp International's net income of $117.8M is higher than WW International's net income of -$46.2M. Notably, Service Corp International's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.72x while WW International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Service Corp International is 2.90x versus 0.13x for WW International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.