DRVN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CDTi Advanced Materials has a net margin of 1.07% compared to Driven Brands Holdings's net margin of --. Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of -35.84% beat CDTi Advanced Materials's return on equity of --.

Driven Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $21.17, signalling upside risk potential of 19.72%. On the other hand CDTi Advanced Materials has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1080.56%. Given that CDTi Advanced Materials has higher upside potential than Driven Brands Holdings, analysts believe CDTi Advanced Materials is more attractive than Driven Brands Holdings.

Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CDTi Advanced Materials has a beta of -0.417, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 141.744%.

Driven Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CDTi Advanced Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Driven Brands Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CDTi Advanced Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $516.2M, which are larger than CDTi Advanced Materials quarterly revenues of --. Driven Brands Holdings's net income of $5.5M is higher than CDTi Advanced Materials's net income of --. Notably, Driven Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 391.00x while CDTi Advanced Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Driven Brands Holdings is 1.25x versus 0.05x for CDTi Advanced Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ChargePoint Holdings has a net margin of 1.07% compared to Driven Brands Holdings's net margin of -57.71%. Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of -35.84% beat ChargePoint Holdings's return on equity of -119.95%.

Driven Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $21.17, signalling upside risk potential of 19.72%. On the other hand ChargePoint Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $1.29 which suggests that it could grow by 108.4%. Given that ChargePoint Holdings has higher upside potential than Driven Brands Holdings, analysts believe ChargePoint Holdings is more attractive than Driven Brands Holdings.

Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ChargePoint Holdings has a beta of 2.224, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 122.403%.

Driven Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ChargePoint Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Driven Brands Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ChargePoint Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $516.2M, which are larger than ChargePoint Holdings quarterly revenues of $101.9M. Driven Brands Holdings's net income of $5.5M is higher than ChargePoint Holdings's net income of -$58.8M. Notably, Driven Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 391.00x while ChargePoint Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Driven Brands Holdings is 1.25x versus 0.64x for ChargePoint Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mister Car Wash has a net margin of 1.07% compared to Driven Brands Holdings's net margin of 10.32%. Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of -35.84% beat Mister Car Wash's return on equity of 8.24%.

Driven Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $21.17, signalling upside risk potential of 19.72%. On the other hand Mister Car Wash has an analysts' consensus of $9.36 which suggests that it could grow by 25.63%. Given that Mister Car Wash has higher upside potential than Driven Brands Holdings, analysts believe Mister Car Wash is more attractive than Driven Brands Holdings.

Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mister Car Wash has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Driven Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mister Car Wash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Driven Brands Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mister Car Wash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $516.2M, which are larger than Mister Car Wash quarterly revenues of $261.7M. Driven Brands Holdings's net income of $5.5M is lower than Mister Car Wash's net income of $27M. Notably, Driven Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 391.00x while Mister Car Wash's PE ratio is 29.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Driven Brands Holdings is 1.25x versus 2.42x for Mister Car Wash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valvoline has a net margin of 1.07% compared to Driven Brands Holdings's net margin of 9.33%. Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of -35.84% beat Valvoline's return on equity of 160.95%.

Driven Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $21.17, signalling upside risk potential of 19.72%. On the other hand Valvoline has an analysts' consensus of $41.85 which suggests that it could grow by 26.81%. Given that Valvoline has higher upside potential than Driven Brands Holdings, analysts believe Valvoline is more attractive than Driven Brands Holdings.

Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valvoline has a beta of 1.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.649%.

Driven Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Valvoline offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Driven Brands Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Valvoline pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $516.2M, which are larger than Valvoline quarterly revenues of $403.2M. Driven Brands Holdings's net income of $5.5M is lower than Valvoline's net income of $37.6M. Notably, Driven Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 391.00x while Valvoline's PE ratio is 16.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Driven Brands Holdings is 1.25x versus 2.55x for Valvoline. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.