DRVN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CDTi Advanced Materials has a net margin of -2.53% compared to Driven Brands Holdings's net margin of --. Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of 0.69% beat CDTi Advanced Materials's return on equity of --.

Driven Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.76%. On the other hand CDTi Advanced Materials has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 865.91%. Given that CDTi Advanced Materials has higher upside potential than Driven Brands Holdings, analysts believe CDTi Advanced Materials is more attractive than Driven Brands Holdings.

Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CDTi Advanced Materials has a beta of -0.537, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 153.688%.

Driven Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CDTi Advanced Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Driven Brands Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CDTi Advanced Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $591.7M, which are larger than CDTi Advanced Materials quarterly revenues of --. Driven Brands Holdings's net income of -$14.9M is higher than CDTi Advanced Materials's net income of --. Notably, Driven Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 401.50x while CDTi Advanced Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Driven Brands Holdings is 1.10x versus 0.06x for CDTi Advanced Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ChargePoint Holdings has a net margin of -2.53% compared to Driven Brands Holdings's net margin of -77.89%. Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of 0.69% beat ChargePoint Holdings's return on equity of -110.99%.

Driven Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.76%. On the other hand ChargePoint Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $3.27 which suggests that it could grow by 69.69%. Given that ChargePoint Holdings has higher upside potential than Driven Brands Holdings, analysts believe ChargePoint Holdings is more attractive than Driven Brands Holdings.

Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ChargePoint Holdings has a beta of 1.690, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.024%.

Driven Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ChargePoint Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Driven Brands Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ChargePoint Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $591.7M, which are larger than ChargePoint Holdings quarterly revenues of $99.6M. Driven Brands Holdings's net income of -$14.9M is higher than ChargePoint Holdings's net income of -$77.6M. Notably, Driven Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 401.50x while ChargePoint Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Driven Brands Holdings is 1.10x versus 1.23x for ChargePoint Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mister Car Wash has a net margin of -2.53% compared to Driven Brands Holdings's net margin of 8.96%. Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of 0.69% beat Mister Car Wash's return on equity of 7.87%.

Driven Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.76%. On the other hand Mister Car Wash has an analysts' consensus of $9.58 which suggests that it could grow by 35.48%. Given that Mister Car Wash has higher upside potential than Driven Brands Holdings, analysts believe Mister Car Wash is more attractive than Driven Brands Holdings.

Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mister Car Wash has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Driven Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mister Car Wash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Driven Brands Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mister Car Wash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $591.7M, which are larger than Mister Car Wash quarterly revenues of $249.3M. Driven Brands Holdings's net income of -$14.9M is lower than Mister Car Wash's net income of $22.3M. Notably, Driven Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 401.50x while Mister Car Wash's PE ratio is 30.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Driven Brands Holdings is 1.10x versus 2.39x for Mister Car Wash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valvoline has a net margin of -2.53% compared to Driven Brands Holdings's net margin of 21.19%. Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of 0.69% beat Valvoline's return on equity of 170.51%.

Driven Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.76%. On the other hand Valvoline has an analysts' consensus of $43.62 which suggests that it could grow by 19.33%. Given that Valvoline has higher upside potential than Driven Brands Holdings, analysts believe Valvoline is more attractive than Driven Brands Holdings.

Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valvoline has a beta of 1.430, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.993%.

Driven Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Valvoline offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Driven Brands Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Valvoline pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $591.7M, which are larger than Valvoline quarterly revenues of $435.5M. Driven Brands Holdings's net income of -$14.9M is lower than Valvoline's net income of $92.3M. Notably, Driven Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 401.50x while Valvoline's PE ratio is 22.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Driven Brands Holdings is 1.10x versus 2.96x for Valvoline. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.