SBSW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Fields has a net margin of -- compared to Sibanye Stillwater's net margin of --. Sibanye Stillwater's return on equity of -15.35% beat Gold Fields's return on equity of 25.25%.

Sibanye Stillwater has a consensus price target of $5.12, signalling downside risk potential of -0.04%. On the other hand Gold Fields has an analysts' consensus of $23.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2%. Given that Gold Fields has higher upside potential than Sibanye Stillwater, analysts believe Gold Fields is more attractive than Sibanye Stillwater.

Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 0.578, which suggesting that the stock is 42.217% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Fields has a beta of 0.561, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.87%.

Sibanye Stillwater has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Fields offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Sibanye Stillwater pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Fields pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sibanye Stillwater quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Fields quarterly revenues of --. Sibanye Stillwater's net income of -- is lower than Gold Fields's net income of --. Notably, Sibanye Stillwater's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Fields's PE ratio is 16.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sibanye Stillwater is 0.59x versus 3.88x for Gold Fields. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harmony Gold Mining has a net margin of -- compared to Sibanye Stillwater's net margin of --. Sibanye Stillwater's return on equity of -15.35% beat Harmony Gold Mining's return on equity of 25.77%.

Sibanye Stillwater has a consensus price target of $5.12, signalling downside risk potential of -0.04%. On the other hand Harmony Gold Mining has an analysts' consensus of $15.81 which suggests that it could grow by 0.24%. Given that Harmony Gold Mining has higher upside potential than Sibanye Stillwater, analysts believe Harmony Gold Mining is more attractive than Sibanye Stillwater.

Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 0.578, which suggesting that the stock is 42.217% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harmony Gold Mining has a beta of 1.006, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.596%.

Sibanye Stillwater has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harmony Gold Mining offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Sibanye Stillwater pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harmony Gold Mining pays out 16.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Harmony Gold Mining's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sibanye Stillwater quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harmony Gold Mining quarterly revenues of --. Sibanye Stillwater's net income of -- is lower than Harmony Gold Mining's net income of --. Notably, Sibanye Stillwater's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harmony Gold Mining's PE ratio is 17.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sibanye Stillwater is 0.59x versus 2.70x for Harmony Gold Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sappi has a net margin of -- compared to Sibanye Stillwater's net margin of -1.49%. Sibanye Stillwater's return on equity of -15.35% beat Sappi's return on equity of 7.35%.

Sibanye Stillwater has a consensus price target of $5.12, signalling downside risk potential of -0.04%. On the other hand Sappi has an analysts' consensus of $2.30 which suggests that it could grow by 31.43%. Given that Sappi has higher upside potential than Sibanye Stillwater, analysts believe Sappi is more attractive than Sibanye Stillwater.

Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 0.578, which suggesting that the stock is 42.217% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sappi has a beta of 0.846, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.367%.

Sibanye Stillwater has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sappi offers a yield of 7.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Sibanye Stillwater pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sappi pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sibanye Stillwater quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sappi quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Sibanye Stillwater's net income of -- is lower than Sappi's net income of -$20M. Notably, Sibanye Stillwater's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sappi's PE ratio is 5.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sibanye Stillwater is 0.59x versus 0.19x for Sappi. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sasol has a net margin of -- compared to Sibanye Stillwater's net margin of --. Sibanye Stillwater's return on equity of -15.35% beat Sasol's return on equity of --.

Sibanye Stillwater has a consensus price target of $5.12, signalling downside risk potential of -0.04%. On the other hand Sasol has an analysts' consensus of $4.59 which suggests that it could grow by 28.7%. Given that Sasol has higher upside potential than Sibanye Stillwater, analysts believe Sasol is more attractive than Sibanye Stillwater.

Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 0.578, which suggesting that the stock is 42.217% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sasol has a beta of 0.707, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.291%.

Sibanye Stillwater has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sasol offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Sibanye Stillwater pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sasol pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sibanye Stillwater quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sasol quarterly revenues of --. Sibanye Stillwater's net income of -- is lower than Sasol's net income of --. Notably, Sibanye Stillwater's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sasol's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sibanye Stillwater is 0.59x versus 0.16x for Sasol. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.