How Big Will the SpaceX IPO Be?
Operated up to now as a private business, SpaceX will…
Buy
53
GFI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$50.02
Seasonality move
:
4.94%
Day range:
$48.80 - $55.50
52-week range:
$16.91 - $61.64
Dividend yield:
1.57%
P/E ratio:
21.16x
P/S ratio:
6.84x
P/B ratio:
14.72x
Volume:
6.6M
Avg. volume:
3.3M
1-year change:
190.05%
Market cap:
$44.9B
Revenue:
$5.2B
EPS (TTM):
$2.11
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFI
Gold Fields Ltd.
|
-- | $1.13 | -- | -- | $55.41 |
|
AU
Anglogold Ashanti Plc
|
$3B | $1.94 | 52.48% | 120.12% | $112.14 |
|
DRD
DRDGOLD Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $46.50 |
|
HMY
Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $24.14 |
|
NEM
Newmont Corp.
|
$6.2B | $1.98 | 29.36% | 25.66% | $125.67 |
|
SBSW
Sibanye Stillwater Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $18.56 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFI
Gold Fields Ltd.
|
$50.12 | $55.41 | $44.9B | 21.16x | $0.40 | 1.57% | 6.84x |
|
AU
Anglogold Ashanti Plc
|
$92.87 | $112.14 | $46.9B | 15.23x | $0.91 | 2.72% | 6.87x |
|
DRD
DRDGOLD Ltd.
|
$31.82 | $46.50 | $2.7B | 21.96x | $0.23 | 1.23% | 6.36x |
|
HMY
Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd.
|
$21.34 | $24.14 | $13.3B | 15.90x | $0.09 | 0.98% | 3.11x |
|
NEM
Newmont Corp.
|
$112.35 | $125.67 | $122.6B | 17.47x | $0.25 | 0.89% | 5.91x |
|
SBSW
Sibanye Stillwater Ltd.
|
$16.88 | $18.56 | $11.9B | -- | $0.11 | 0% | 1.94x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFI
Gold Fields Ltd.
|
32.42% | -0.726 | -- | 0.67x |
|
AU
Anglogold Ashanti Plc
|
22.22% | -1.014 | 8.52% | 1.98x |
|
DRD
DRDGOLD Ltd.
|
-- | -2.064 | -- | 1.63x |
|
HMY
Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd.
|
4.41% | -2.596 | -- | 1.43x |
|
NEM
Newmont Corp.
|
14.54% | -0.337 | 6.12% | 1.38x |
|
SBSW
Sibanye Stillwater Ltd.
|
48.66% | 0.382 | -- | 1.09x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFI
Gold Fields Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 18.89% | 25.25% | -- | -- |
|
AU
Anglogold Ashanti Plc
|
$1.1B | $1.1B | 20% | 26.05% | 44.58% | $668M |
|
DRD
DRDGOLD Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 24.25% | 27.94% | -- | -- |
|
HMY
Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 24.37% | 25.77% | -- | -- |
|
NEM
Newmont Corp.
|
$2.6B | $2.5B | 18.42% | 23.04% | 45.71% | $1.6B |
|
SBSW
Sibanye Stillwater Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -8.45% | -15.35% | -- | -- |
Gold Fields Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GFI or AU?
Anglogold Ashanti Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Gold Fields Ltd.'s net margin of 27.36%. Gold Fields Ltd.'s return on equity of 25.25% beat Anglogold Ashanti Plc's return on equity of 26.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFIGold Fields Ltd.-- -- $7.9B AUAnglogold Ashanti Plc48.96% $1.31 $11.4B -
What do Analysts Say About GFI or AU?
Gold Fields Ltd. has a consensus price target of $55.41, signalling upside risk potential of 10.55%. On the other hand Anglogold Ashanti Plc has an analysts' consensus of $112.14 which suggests that it could grow by 20.75%. Given that Anglogold Ashanti Plc has higher upside potential than Gold Fields Ltd., analysts believe Anglogold Ashanti Plc is more attractive than Gold Fields Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFIGold Fields Ltd.2 4 0 AUAnglogold Ashanti Plc3 0 1 -
Is GFI or AU More Risky?
Gold Fields Ltd. has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.855% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Anglogold Ashanti Plc has a beta of 0.583, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.729%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFI or AU?
Gold Fields Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.57%. Anglogold Ashanti Plc offers a yield of 2.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Gold Fields Ltd. pays 31.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Anglogold Ashanti Plc pays out 39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFI or AU?
Gold Fields Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Anglogold Ashanti Plc quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Gold Fields Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Anglogold Ashanti Plc's net income of $815M. Notably, Gold Fields Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.16x while Anglogold Ashanti Plc's PE ratio is 15.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Fields Ltd. is 6.84x versus 6.87x for Anglogold Ashanti Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFIGold Fields Ltd.6.84x 21.16x -- -- AUAnglogold Ashanti Plc6.87x 15.23x $2.4B $815M
-
Which has Higher Returns GFI or DRD?
DRDGOLD Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Gold Fields Ltd.'s net margin of --. Gold Fields Ltd.'s return on equity of 25.25% beat DRDGOLD Ltd.'s return on equity of 27.94%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFIGold Fields Ltd.-- -- $7.9B DRDDRDGOLD Ltd.-- -- $408.5M -
What do Analysts Say About GFI or DRD?
Gold Fields Ltd. has a consensus price target of $55.41, signalling upside risk potential of 10.55%. On the other hand DRDGOLD Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $46.50 which suggests that it could grow by 46.14%. Given that DRDGOLD Ltd. has higher upside potential than Gold Fields Ltd., analysts believe DRDGOLD Ltd. is more attractive than Gold Fields Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFIGold Fields Ltd.2 4 0 DRDDRDGOLD Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is GFI or DRD More Risky?
Gold Fields Ltd. has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.855% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DRDGOLD Ltd. has a beta of 0.396, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.433%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFI or DRD?
Gold Fields Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.57%. DRDGOLD Ltd. offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Gold Fields Ltd. pays 31.92% of its earnings as a dividend. DRDGOLD Ltd. pays out 21.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFI or DRD?
Gold Fields Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than DRDGOLD Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Gold Fields Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than DRDGOLD Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Gold Fields Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.16x while DRDGOLD Ltd.'s PE ratio is 21.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Fields Ltd. is 6.84x versus 6.36x for DRDGOLD Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFIGold Fields Ltd.6.84x 21.16x -- -- DRDDRDGOLD Ltd.6.36x 21.96x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GFI or HMY?
Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Gold Fields Ltd.'s net margin of --. Gold Fields Ltd.'s return on equity of 25.25% beat Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 25.77%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFIGold Fields Ltd.-- -- $7.9B HMYHarmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd.-- -- $2.6B -
What do Analysts Say About GFI or HMY?
Gold Fields Ltd. has a consensus price target of $55.41, signalling upside risk potential of 10.55%. On the other hand Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $24.14 which suggests that it could grow by 13.1%. Given that Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Gold Fields Ltd., analysts believe Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Gold Fields Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFIGold Fields Ltd.2 4 0 HMYHarmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd.1 2 0 -
Is GFI or HMY More Risky?
Gold Fields Ltd. has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.855% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.946, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.432%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFI or HMY?
Gold Fields Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.57%. Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Gold Fields Ltd. pays 31.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd. pays out 13.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFI or HMY?
Gold Fields Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Gold Fields Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Gold Fields Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.16x while Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 15.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Fields Ltd. is 6.84x versus 3.11x for Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFIGold Fields Ltd.6.84x 21.16x -- -- HMYHarmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd.3.11x 15.90x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GFI or NEM?
Newmont Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Gold Fields Ltd.'s net margin of 34.26%. Gold Fields Ltd.'s return on equity of 25.25% beat Newmont Corp.'s return on equity of 23.04%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFIGold Fields Ltd.-- -- $7.9B NEMNewmont Corp.48.29% $1.67 $39.1B -
What do Analysts Say About GFI or NEM?
Gold Fields Ltd. has a consensus price target of $55.41, signalling upside risk potential of 10.55%. On the other hand Newmont Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $125.67 which suggests that it could grow by 11.86%. Given that Newmont Corp. has higher upside potential than Gold Fields Ltd., analysts believe Newmont Corp. is more attractive than Gold Fields Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFIGold Fields Ltd.2 4 0 NEMNewmont Corp.12 3 1 -
Is GFI or NEM More Risky?
Gold Fields Ltd. has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.855% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newmont Corp. has a beta of 0.407, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.31%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFI or NEM?
Gold Fields Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.57%. Newmont Corp. offers a yield of 0.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Gold Fields Ltd. pays 31.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmont Corp. pays out 35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFI or NEM?
Gold Fields Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Newmont Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.4B. Gold Fields Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Newmont Corp.'s net income of $1.8B. Notably, Gold Fields Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.16x while Newmont Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Fields Ltd. is 6.84x versus 5.91x for Newmont Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFIGold Fields Ltd.6.84x 21.16x -- -- NEMNewmont Corp.5.91x 17.47x $5.4B $1.8B
-
Which has Higher Returns GFI or SBSW?
Sibanye Stillwater Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Gold Fields Ltd.'s net margin of --. Gold Fields Ltd.'s return on equity of 25.25% beat Sibanye Stillwater Ltd.'s return on equity of -15.35%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFIGold Fields Ltd.-- -- $7.9B SBSWSibanye Stillwater Ltd.-- -- $4.8B -
What do Analysts Say About GFI or SBSW?
Gold Fields Ltd. has a consensus price target of $55.41, signalling upside risk potential of 10.55%. On the other hand Sibanye Stillwater Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $18.56 which suggests that it could grow by 9.96%. Given that Gold Fields Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sibanye Stillwater Ltd., analysts believe Gold Fields Ltd. is more attractive than Sibanye Stillwater Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFIGold Fields Ltd.2 4 0 SBSWSibanye Stillwater Ltd.1 2 0 -
Is GFI or SBSW More Risky?
Gold Fields Ltd. has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.855% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sibanye Stillwater Ltd. has a beta of 0.618, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.235%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFI or SBSW?
Gold Fields Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.57%. Sibanye Stillwater Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Gold Fields Ltd. pays 31.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Sibanye Stillwater Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Fields Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFI or SBSW?
Gold Fields Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sibanye Stillwater Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Gold Fields Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Sibanye Stillwater Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Gold Fields Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.16x while Sibanye Stillwater Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Fields Ltd. is 6.84x versus 1.94x for Sibanye Stillwater Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFIGold Fields Ltd.6.84x 21.16x -- -- SBSWSibanye Stillwater Ltd.1.94x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?
Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) is the innovative medical tech business behind…
Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?
UAV and hypersonic system defense contractor Kratos (NASDAQ:KTOS) has swung…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Sell
50
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Alerts
Sell
40
GDXU alert for Jan 31
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 38.85% over the past day.
Sell
34
PFSI alert for Jan 31
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. [PFSI] is down 33.21% over the past day.
Sell
40
SHNY alert for Jan 31
MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN [SHNY] is down 31.56% over the past day.
