RSKD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Five9 has a net margin of -12.3% compared to Riskified's net margin of -1.7%. Riskified's return on equity of -7.49% beat Five9's return on equity of -7.04%.

Riskified has a consensus price target of $5.59, signalling upside risk potential of 15.81%. On the other hand Five9 has an analysts' consensus of $52.58 which suggests that it could grow by 28.82%. Given that Five9 has higher upside potential than Riskified, analysts believe Five9 is more attractive than Riskified.

Riskified has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five9 has a beta of 0.920, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.022%.

Riskified has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Five9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riskified pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Five9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Riskified quarterly revenues are $78.8M, which are smaller than Five9 quarterly revenues of $264.2M. Riskified's net income of -$9.7M is lower than Five9's net income of -$4.5M. Notably, Riskified's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Five9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riskified is 2.66x versus 3.02x for Five9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -12.3% compared to Riskified's net margin of -9.14%. Riskified's return on equity of -7.49% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

Riskified has a consensus price target of $5.59, signalling upside risk potential of 15.81%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 32.87%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Riskified, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Riskified.

Riskified has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.937, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.269%.

Riskified has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riskified pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Riskified quarterly revenues are $78.8M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. Riskified's net income of -$9.7M is lower than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, Riskified's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riskified is 2.66x versus 1.27x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Issuer Direct has a net margin of -12.3% compared to Riskified's net margin of -6.7%. Riskified's return on equity of -7.49% beat Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74%.

Riskified has a consensus price target of $5.59, signalling upside risk potential of 15.81%. On the other hand Issuer Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 42.39%. Given that Issuer Direct has higher upside potential than Riskified, analysts believe Issuer Direct is more attractive than Riskified.

Riskified has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.769, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.119%.

Riskified has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Issuer Direct offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riskified pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Issuer Direct pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Riskified quarterly revenues are $78.8M, which are larger than Issuer Direct quarterly revenues of $7M. Riskified's net income of -$9.7M is lower than Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K. Notably, Riskified's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Issuer Direct's PE ratio is 59.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riskified is 2.66x versus 1.20x for Issuer Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rapid7 has a net margin of -12.3% compared to Riskified's net margin of 7.71%. Riskified's return on equity of -7.49% beat Rapid7's return on equity of --.

Riskified has a consensus price target of $5.59, signalling upside risk potential of 15.81%. On the other hand Rapid7 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.57%. Given that Riskified has higher upside potential than Rapid7, analysts believe Riskified is more attractive than Rapid7.

Riskified has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rapid7 has a beta of 0.958, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.204%.

Riskified has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rapid7 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riskified pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rapid7 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Riskified quarterly revenues are $78.8M, which are smaller than Rapid7 quarterly revenues of $214.7M. Riskified's net income of -$9.7M is lower than Rapid7's net income of $16.6M. Notably, Riskified's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rapid7's PE ratio is 62.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riskified is 2.66x versus 3.38x for Rapid7. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.