Financhill
Buy
70

RNGR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$13.85
Seasonality move :
0.62%
Day range:
$13.82 - $14.06
52-week range:
$10.56 - $18.45
Dividend yield:
1.73%
P/E ratio:
21.14x
P/S ratio:
0.57x
P/B ratio:
1.21x
Volume:
39K
Avg. volume:
149.5K
1-year change:
-4.22%
Market cap:
$327M
Revenue:
$571.1M
EPS (TTM):
$0.66

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
RNGR
Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
$141M $0.38 -1.7% -17% $17.50
HAL
Halliburton Co.
$5.4B $0.50 -3.83% -23.58% $31.21
KLXE
KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.
$164.6M -$0.72 -3.93% -11.29% $4.00
OII
Oceaneering International, Inc.
$712.5M $0.43 -4.99% -44.75% $24.25
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.
$264M -$0.15 -13.1% -2.34% $13.00
SLB
SLB Ltd.
$8.9B $0.66 2.72% -3.51% $45.99
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
RNGR
Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
$13.85 $17.50 $327M 21.14x $0.06 1.73% 0.57x
HAL
Halliburton Co.
$28.03 $31.21 $23.6B 18.56x $0.17 2.43% 1.09x
KLXE
KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.
$1.70 $4.00 $30.3M -- $0.00 0% 0.05x
OII
Oceaneering International, Inc.
$24.30 $24.25 $2.4B 10.63x $0.00 0% 0.87x
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.
$9.35 $13.00 $972.2M 26.47x $0.00 0% 0.75x
SLB
SLB Ltd.
$37.97 $45.99 $56.7B 14.67x $0.29 3% 1.52x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
RNGR
Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
10.12% 1.719 10.02% 2.26x
HAL
Halliburton Co.
45.64% 1.325 41.24% 1.33x
KLXE
KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.
124.43% 2.618 906.95% 0.87x
OII
Oceaneering International, Inc.
49.79% 1.547 36.31% 1.56x
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.
19.65% 2.507 37.07% 1.13x
SLB
SLB Ltd.
33.24% 0.690 25.1% 0.93x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
RNGR
Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
$8.8M $2.6M 4.89% 5.47% 2.02% $8M
HAL
Halliburton Co.
$856M $748M 6.91% 12.64% 13.36% $227M
KLXE
KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.
$13M -$3M -25.84% -460.87% -1.8% $1.5M
OII
Oceaneering International, Inc.
$152.7M $86.5M 14.1% 29.28% 11.65% $77M
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.
$15.8M -$1.9M -1.69% -2.06% -0.66% -$2.7M
SLB
SLB Ltd.
$1.6B $1.4B 10.45% 16.49% 15.54% $1.2B

Ranger Energy Services, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns RNGR or HAL?

    Halliburton Co. has a net margin of 0.93% compared to Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s net margin of 0.36%. Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.47% beat Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.64%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RNGR
    Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
    6.83% $0.05 $300.4M
    HAL
    Halliburton Co.
    15.29% $0.02 $18.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About RNGR or HAL?

    Ranger Energy Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.50, signalling upside risk potential of 26.35%. On the other hand Halliburton Co. has an analysts' consensus of $31.21 which suggests that it could grow by 11.34%. Given that Ranger Energy Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Halliburton Co., analysts believe Ranger Energy Services, Inc. is more attractive than Halliburton Co..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RNGR
    Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
    1 1 0
    HAL
    Halliburton Co.
    13 8 0
  • Is RNGR or HAL More Risky?

    Ranger Energy Services, Inc. has a beta of 0.164, which suggesting that the stock is 83.589% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.814, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.59%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RNGR or HAL?

    Ranger Energy Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.73%. Halliburton Co. offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Ranger Energy Services, Inc. pays 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton Co. pays out 24.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RNGR or HAL?

    Ranger Energy Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $128.9M, which are smaller than Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s net income of $1.2M is lower than Halliburton Co.'s net income of $20M. Notably, Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.14x while Halliburton Co.'s PE ratio is 18.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ranger Energy Services, Inc. is 0.57x versus 1.09x for Halliburton Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RNGR
    Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
    0.57x 21.14x $128.9M $1.2M
    HAL
    Halliburton Co.
    1.09x 18.56x $5.6B $20M
  • Which has Higher Returns RNGR or KLXE?

    KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 0.93% compared to Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s net margin of -8.58%. Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.47% beat KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -460.87%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RNGR
    Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
    6.83% $0.05 $300.4M
    KLXE
    KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.
    7.8% -$0.74 $250.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About RNGR or KLXE?

    Ranger Energy Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.50, signalling upside risk potential of 26.35%. On the other hand KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 135.29%. Given that KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ranger Energy Services, Inc., analysts believe KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Ranger Energy Services, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RNGR
    Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
    1 1 0
    KLXE
    KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is RNGR or KLXE More Risky?

    Ranger Energy Services, Inc. has a beta of 0.164, which suggesting that the stock is 83.589% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.417, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.316%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RNGR or KLXE?

    Ranger Energy Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.73%. KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ranger Energy Services, Inc. pays 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RNGR or KLXE?

    Ranger Energy Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $128.9M, which are smaller than KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $166.7M. Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s net income of $1.2M is higher than KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$14.3M. Notably, Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.14x while KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ranger Energy Services, Inc. is 0.57x versus 0.05x for KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RNGR
    Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
    0.57x 21.14x $128.9M $1.2M
    KLXE
    KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.
    0.05x -- $166.7M -$14.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns RNGR or OII?

    Oceaneering International, Inc. has a net margin of 0.93% compared to Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s net margin of 9.6%. Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.47% beat Oceaneering International, Inc.'s return on equity of 29.28%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RNGR
    Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
    6.83% $0.05 $300.4M
    OII
    Oceaneering International, Inc.
    20.56% $0.71 $1.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About RNGR or OII?

    Ranger Energy Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.50, signalling upside risk potential of 26.35%. On the other hand Oceaneering International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.25 which suggests that it could fall by -0.21%. Given that Ranger Energy Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, Inc., analysts believe Ranger Energy Services, Inc. is more attractive than Oceaneering International, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RNGR
    Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
    1 1 0
    OII
    Oceaneering International, Inc.
    0 4 0
  • Is RNGR or OII More Risky?

    Ranger Energy Services, Inc. has a beta of 0.164, which suggesting that the stock is 83.589% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceaneering International, Inc. has a beta of 1.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.306%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RNGR or OII?

    Ranger Energy Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.73%. Oceaneering International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ranger Energy Services, Inc. pays 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Oceaneering International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RNGR or OII?

    Ranger Energy Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $128.9M, which are smaller than Oceaneering International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $742.9M. Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s net income of $1.2M is lower than Oceaneering International, Inc.'s net income of $71.3M. Notably, Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.14x while Oceaneering International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ranger Energy Services, Inc. is 0.57x versus 0.87x for Oceaneering International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RNGR
    Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
    0.57x 21.14x $128.9M $1.2M
    OII
    Oceaneering International, Inc.
    0.87x 10.63x $742.9M $71.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns RNGR or PUMP?

    ProPetro Holding Corp. has a net margin of 0.93% compared to Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s net margin of -0.81%. Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.47% beat ProPetro Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -2.06%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RNGR
    Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
    6.83% $0.05 $300.4M
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding Corp.
    5.36% -$0.02 $1B
  • What do Analysts Say About RNGR or PUMP?

    Ranger Energy Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.50, signalling upside risk potential of 26.35%. On the other hand ProPetro Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 39.04%. Given that ProPetro Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Ranger Energy Services, Inc., analysts believe ProPetro Holding Corp. is more attractive than Ranger Energy Services, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RNGR
    Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
    1 1 0
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding Corp.
    1 5 0
  • Is RNGR or PUMP More Risky?

    Ranger Energy Services, Inc. has a beta of 0.164, which suggesting that the stock is 83.589% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProPetro Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.801, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.943%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RNGR or PUMP?

    Ranger Energy Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.73%. ProPetro Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ranger Energy Services, Inc. pays 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. ProPetro Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RNGR or PUMP?

    Ranger Energy Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $128.9M, which are smaller than ProPetro Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $293.9M. Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s net income of $1.2M is higher than ProPetro Holding Corp.'s net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.14x while ProPetro Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 26.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ranger Energy Services, Inc. is 0.57x versus 0.75x for ProPetro Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RNGR
    Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
    0.57x 21.14x $128.9M $1.2M
    PUMP
    ProPetro Holding Corp.
    0.75x 26.47x $293.9M -$2.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns RNGR or SLB?

    SLB Ltd. has a net margin of 0.93% compared to Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s net margin of 8.68%. Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.47% beat SLB Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.49%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    RNGR
    Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
    6.83% $0.05 $300.4M
    SLB
    SLB Ltd.
    18.25% $0.50 $39.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About RNGR or SLB?

    Ranger Energy Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.50, signalling upside risk potential of 26.35%. On the other hand SLB Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $45.99 which suggests that it could grow by 21.11%. Given that Ranger Energy Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than SLB Ltd., analysts believe Ranger Energy Services, Inc. is more attractive than SLB Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    RNGR
    Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
    1 1 0
    SLB
    SLB Ltd.
    19 2 0
  • Is RNGR or SLB More Risky?

    Ranger Energy Services, Inc. has a beta of 0.164, which suggesting that the stock is 83.589% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SLB Ltd. has a beta of 0.729, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.082%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock RNGR or SLB?

    Ranger Energy Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.73%. SLB Ltd. offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Ranger Energy Services, Inc. pays 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. SLB Ltd. pays out 35.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios RNGR or SLB?

    Ranger Energy Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $128.9M, which are smaller than SLB Ltd. quarterly revenues of $8.9B. Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s net income of $1.2M is lower than SLB Ltd.'s net income of $774M. Notably, Ranger Energy Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.14x while SLB Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ranger Energy Services, Inc. is 0.57x versus 1.52x for SLB Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    RNGR
    Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
    0.57x 21.14x $128.9M $1.2M
    SLB
    SLB Ltd.
    1.52x 14.67x $8.9B $774M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?

Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…

Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?

Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…

Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?

Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…

Stock Ideas

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x

Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25

Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.

Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25

Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.

Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25

Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock