RCI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

IMAX Corp. has a net margin of 2.84% compared to Rogers Communications, Inc.'s net margin of 21.21%. Rogers Communications, Inc.'s return on equity of 46.37% beat IMAX Corp.'s return on equity of 12.64%.

Rogers Communications, Inc. has a consensus price target of $41.56, signalling upside risk potential of 11.56%. On the other hand IMAX Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $43.18 which suggests that it could grow by 14.48%. Given that IMAX Corp. has higher upside potential than Rogers Communications, Inc., analysts believe IMAX Corp. is more attractive than Rogers Communications, Inc..

Rogers Communications, Inc. has a beta of 0.741, which suggesting that the stock is 25.915% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IMAX Corp. has a beta of 0.413, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.664%.

Rogers Communications, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. IMAX Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rogers Communications, Inc. pays 61.59% of its earnings as a dividend. IMAX Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rogers Communications, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rogers Communications, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than IMAX Corp. quarterly revenues of $106.7M. Rogers Communications, Inc.'s net income of $4.2B is higher than IMAX Corp.'s net income of $22.6M. Notably, Rogers Communications, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.13x while IMAX Corp.'s PE ratio is 52.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rogers Communications, Inc. is 1.34x versus 5.50x for IMAX Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lionsgate Studios Corp. has a net margin of 2.84% compared to Rogers Communications, Inc.'s net margin of -23.49%. Rogers Communications, Inc.'s return on equity of 46.37% beat Lionsgate Studios Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Rogers Communications, Inc. has a consensus price target of $41.56, signalling upside risk potential of 11.56%. On the other hand Lionsgate Studios Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $9.28 which suggests that it could grow by 4.25%. Given that Rogers Communications, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lionsgate Studios Corp., analysts believe Rogers Communications, Inc. is more attractive than Lionsgate Studios Corp..

Rogers Communications, Inc. has a beta of 0.741, which suggesting that the stock is 25.915% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lionsgate Studios Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rogers Communications, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Lionsgate Studios Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rogers Communications, Inc. pays 61.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Lionsgate Studios Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rogers Communications, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rogers Communications, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Lionsgate Studios Corp. quarterly revenues of $475.1M. Rogers Communications, Inc.'s net income of $4.2B is higher than Lionsgate Studios Corp.'s net income of -$111.6M. Notably, Rogers Communications, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.13x while Lionsgate Studios Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rogers Communications, Inc. is 1.34x versus 0.91x for Lionsgate Studios Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana) has a net margin of 2.84% compared to Rogers Communications, Inc.'s net margin of -20.12%. Rogers Communications, Inc.'s return on equity of 46.37% beat Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana)'s return on equity of -610.25%.

Rogers Communications, Inc. has a consensus price target of $41.56, signalling upside risk potential of 11.56%. On the other hand Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana) has an analysts' consensus of $7.23 which suggests that it could fall by -6.91%. Given that Rogers Communications, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana), analysts believe Rogers Communications, Inc. is more attractive than Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana).

Rogers Communications, Inc. has a beta of 0.741, which suggesting that the stock is 25.915% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana) has a beta of 1.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.051%.

Rogers Communications, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rogers Communications, Inc. pays 61.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana) pays out 5.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rogers Communications, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana) quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Rogers Communications, Inc.'s net income of $4.2B is higher than Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana)'s net income of -$621M. Notably, Rogers Communications, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.13x while Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rogers Communications, Inc. is 1.34x versus 0.61x for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Telefónica SA has a net margin of 2.84% compared to Rogers Communications, Inc.'s net margin of 3.72%. Rogers Communications, Inc.'s return on equity of 46.37% beat Telefónica SA's return on equity of 0.46%.

Rogers Communications, Inc. has a consensus price target of $41.56, signalling upside risk potential of 11.56%. On the other hand Telefónica SA has an analysts' consensus of $4.32 which suggests that it could grow by 7.88%. Given that Rogers Communications, Inc. has higher upside potential than Telefónica SA, analysts believe Rogers Communications, Inc. is more attractive than Telefónica SA.

Rogers Communications, Inc. has a beta of 0.741, which suggesting that the stock is 25.915% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Telefónica SA has a beta of 0.270, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.04%.

Rogers Communications, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Telefónica SA offers a yield of 8.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Rogers Communications, Inc. pays 61.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Telefónica SA pays out 2866.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Rogers Communications, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Telefónica SA's is not.

Rogers Communications, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are smaller than Telefónica SA quarterly revenues of $10.5B. Rogers Communications, Inc.'s net income of $4.2B is higher than Telefónica SA's net income of $389.1M. Notably, Rogers Communications, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.13x while Telefónica SA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rogers Communications, Inc. is 1.34x versus 0.54x for Telefónica SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.