LION Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

IMAX Corp. has a net margin of -23.49% compared to Lionsgate Studios Corp.'s net margin of 21.21%. Lionsgate Studios Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat IMAX Corp.'s return on equity of 12.64%.

Lionsgate Studios Corp. has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 2.15%. On the other hand IMAX Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $43.73 which suggests that it could grow by 23.56%. Given that IMAX Corp. has higher upside potential than Lionsgate Studios Corp., analysts believe IMAX Corp. is more attractive than Lionsgate Studios Corp..

Lionsgate Studios Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IMAX Corp. has a beta of 0.373, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.728%.

Lionsgate Studios Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IMAX Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lionsgate Studios Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IMAX Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lionsgate Studios Corp. quarterly revenues are $475.1M, which are larger than IMAX Corp. quarterly revenues of $106.7M. Lionsgate Studios Corp.'s net income of -$111.6M is lower than IMAX Corp.'s net income of $22.6M. Notably, Lionsgate Studios Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IMAX Corp.'s PE ratio is 49.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lionsgate Studios Corp. is 0.95x versus 5.16x for IMAX Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marcus Corp. has a net margin of -23.49% compared to Lionsgate Studios Corp.'s net margin of 7.72%. Lionsgate Studios Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Marcus Corp.'s return on equity of 1.7%.

Lionsgate Studios Corp. has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 2.15%. On the other hand Marcus Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $23.25 which suggests that it could grow by 47.15%. Given that Marcus Corp. has higher upside potential than Lionsgate Studios Corp., analysts believe Marcus Corp. is more attractive than Lionsgate Studios Corp..

Lionsgate Studios Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marcus Corp. has a beta of 0.548, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.186%.

Lionsgate Studios Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marcus Corp. offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Lionsgate Studios Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marcus Corp. pays out 112.8% of its earnings as a dividend.

Lionsgate Studios Corp. quarterly revenues are $475.1M, which are larger than Marcus Corp. quarterly revenues of $210.2M. Lionsgate Studios Corp.'s net income of -$111.6M is lower than Marcus Corp.'s net income of $16.2M. Notably, Lionsgate Studios Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marcus Corp.'s PE ratio is 67.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lionsgate Studios Corp. is 0.95x versus 0.66x for Marcus Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Skydance Corp. has a net margin of -23.49% compared to Lionsgate Studios Corp.'s net margin of 2.9%. Lionsgate Studios Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Paramount Skydance Corp.'s return on equity of 1.2%.

Lionsgate Studios Corp. has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 2.15%. On the other hand Paramount Skydance Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $14.57 which suggests that it could grow by 23.66%. Given that Paramount Skydance Corp. has higher upside potential than Lionsgate Studios Corp., analysts believe Paramount Skydance Corp. is more attractive than Lionsgate Studios Corp..

Lionsgate Studios Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Skydance Corp. has a beta of 1.172, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.155%.

Lionsgate Studios Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Skydance Corp. offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Lionsgate Studios Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Skydance Corp. pays out 2.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Skydance Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lionsgate Studios Corp. quarterly revenues are $475.1M, which are smaller than Paramount Skydance Corp. quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Lionsgate Studios Corp.'s net income of -$111.6M is lower than Paramount Skydance Corp.'s net income of $194M. Notably, Lionsgate Studios Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Skydance Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lionsgate Studios Corp. is 0.95x versus 0.32x for Paramount Skydance Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Warner Music Group Corp. has a net margin of -23.49% compared to Lionsgate Studios Corp.'s net margin of 5.78%. Lionsgate Studios Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Warner Music Group Corp.'s return on equity of 49.05%.

Lionsgate Studios Corp. has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 2.15%. On the other hand Warner Music Group Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $37.67 which suggests that it could grow by 26.19%. Given that Warner Music Group Corp. has higher upside potential than Lionsgate Studios Corp., analysts believe Warner Music Group Corp. is more attractive than Lionsgate Studios Corp..

Lionsgate Studios Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Warner Music Group Corp. has a beta of 1.251, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.128%.

Lionsgate Studios Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Warner Music Group Corp. offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Lionsgate Studios Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Warner Music Group Corp. pays out 105.25% of its earnings as a dividend.

Lionsgate Studios Corp. quarterly revenues are $475.1M, which are smaller than Warner Music Group Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Lionsgate Studios Corp.'s net income of -$111.6M is lower than Warner Music Group Corp.'s net income of $108M. Notably, Lionsgate Studios Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Warner Music Group Corp.'s PE ratio is 42.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lionsgate Studios Corp. is 0.95x versus 2.32x for Warner Music Group Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.