QSR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

McDonald's has a net margin of 7.54% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 31.37%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 19.39% beat McDonald's's return on equity of --.

Restaurant Brands International has a consensus price target of $76.99, signalling upside risk potential of 14.69%. On the other hand McDonald's has an analysts' consensus of $332.01 which suggests that it could grow by 5.84%. Given that Restaurant Brands International has higher upside potential than McDonald's, analysts believe Restaurant Brands International is more attractive than McDonald's.

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.601, which suggesting that the stock is 39.898% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McDonald's has a beta of 0.569, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.052%.

Restaurant Brands International has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. McDonald's offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.77 per share. Restaurant Brands International pays 100.78% of its earnings as a dividend. McDonald's pays out 59.22% of its earnings as a dividend. McDonald's's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Restaurant Brands International's is not.

Restaurant Brands International quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than McDonald's quarterly revenues of $6B. Restaurant Brands International's net income of $159M is lower than McDonald's's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Restaurant Brands International's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.76x while McDonald's's PE ratio is 27.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Restaurant Brands International is 3.48x versus 8.78x for McDonald's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Starbucks has a net margin of 7.54% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 4.39%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 19.39% beat Starbucks's return on equity of --.

Restaurant Brands International has a consensus price target of $76.99, signalling upside risk potential of 14.69%. On the other hand Starbucks has an analysts' consensus of $91.77 which suggests that it could grow by 14.28%. Given that Restaurant Brands International has higher upside potential than Starbucks, analysts believe Restaurant Brands International is more attractive than Starbucks.

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.601, which suggesting that the stock is 39.898% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Starbucks has a beta of 0.995, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.539%.

Restaurant Brands International has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Starbucks offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Restaurant Brands International pays 100.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks pays out 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Restaurant Brands International's is not.

Restaurant Brands International quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Starbucks quarterly revenues of $8.8B. Restaurant Brands International's net income of $159M is lower than Starbucks's net income of $384.2M. Notably, Restaurant Brands International's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.76x while Starbucks's PE ratio is 29.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Restaurant Brands International is 3.48x versus 2.51x for Starbucks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Wendy's has a net margin of 7.54% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 7.5%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 19.39% beat The Wendy's's return on equity of 78.73%.

Restaurant Brands International has a consensus price target of $76.99, signalling upside risk potential of 14.69%. On the other hand The Wendy's has an analysts' consensus of $14.74 which suggests that it could grow by 22.8%. Given that The Wendy's has higher upside potential than Restaurant Brands International, analysts believe The Wendy's is more attractive than Restaurant Brands International.

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.601, which suggesting that the stock is 39.898% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Wendy's has a beta of 0.398, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.192%.

Restaurant Brands International has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. The Wendy's offers a yield of 8.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Restaurant Brands International pays 100.78% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wendy's pays out 105.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Restaurant Brands International quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than The Wendy's quarterly revenues of $523.5M. Restaurant Brands International's net income of $159M is higher than The Wendy's's net income of $39.2M. Notably, Restaurant Brands International's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.76x while The Wendy's's PE ratio is 12.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Restaurant Brands International is 3.48x versus 1.10x for The Wendy's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum Brands has a net margin of 7.54% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 14.16%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 19.39% beat Yum Brands's return on equity of --.

Restaurant Brands International has a consensus price target of $76.99, signalling upside risk potential of 14.69%. On the other hand Yum Brands has an analysts' consensus of $158.33 which suggests that it could grow by 7.61%. Given that Restaurant Brands International has higher upside potential than Yum Brands, analysts believe Restaurant Brands International is more attractive than Yum Brands.

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.601, which suggesting that the stock is 39.898% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum Brands has a beta of 0.774, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.641%.

Restaurant Brands International has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Yum Brands offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Restaurant Brands International pays 100.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands pays out 50.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Restaurant Brands International's is not.

Restaurant Brands International quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Yum Brands quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Restaurant Brands International's net income of $159M is lower than Yum Brands's net income of $253M. Notably, Restaurant Brands International's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.76x while Yum Brands's PE ratio is 29.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Restaurant Brands International is 3.48x versus 5.41x for Yum Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.