Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
42
PUK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$31.10
Seasonality move
:
-2.82%
Day range:
$31.07 - $31.38
52-week range:
$14.39 - $31.64
Dividend yield:
1.54%
P/E ratio:
12.13x
P/S ratio:
1.91x
P/B ratio:
1.94x
Volume:
394.5K
Avg. volume:
752.3K
1-year change:
95.23%
Market cap:
$39.8B
Revenue:
$16.7B
EPS (TTM):
$2.59
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PUK
Prudential Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $35.84 |
|
ABTS
Abits Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings Ltd.
|
$727.5M | $3.16 | 27.61% | 84.01% | $227.55 |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TROO
TROOPS, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PUK
Prudential Plc
|
$31.12 | $35.84 | $39.8B | 12.13x | $0.15 | 1.54% | 1.91x |
|
ABTS
Abits Group, Inc.
|
$5.15 | -- | $12.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.73x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings Ltd.
|
$164.21 | $227.55 | $22.9B | 18.35x | $2.00 | 0% | 8.64x |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
|
$2.10 | -- | $82.9M | 8.95x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.44x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global Ltd.
|
$1.18 | -- | $4.8M | -- | $0.01 | 0% | 4.55x |
|
TROO
TROOPS, Inc.
|
$3.20 | -- | $390.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 23.06x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PUK
Prudential Plc
|
20.34% | -0.714 | -- | 1.39x |
|
ABTS
Abits Group, Inc.
|
-- | 8.751 | -- | 0.83x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings Ltd.
|
27.22% | 2.164 | 7.22% | 0.07x |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
|
22.88% | 2.818 | 9.26% | 0.30x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global Ltd.
|
-- | 2.965 | -- | 56.19x |
|
TROO
TROOPS, Inc.
|
18.45% | 4.315 | 6.4% | 2.30x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PUK
Prudential Plc
|
-- | -- | 10.14% | 12.72% | -- | -- |
|
ABTS
Abits Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -63.52% | -63.52% | -- | -- |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings Ltd.
|
$782.8M | $563.4M | 24% | 31.29% | 68.38% | -- |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -27.01% | -30.78% | -- | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.43% | -0.43% | -- | -- |
|
TROO
TROOPS, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -3.12% | -3.38% | -- | -- |
Prudential Plc vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PUK or ABTS?
Abits Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Prudential Plc's net margin of --. Prudential Plc's return on equity of 12.72% beat Abits Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -63.52%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PUKPrudential Plc-- -- $23.1B ABTSAbits Group, Inc.-- -- $11.3M -
What do Analysts Say About PUK or ABTS?
Prudential Plc has a consensus price target of $35.84, signalling upside risk potential of 15.16%. On the other hand Abits Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Prudential Plc has higher upside potential than Abits Group, Inc., analysts believe Prudential Plc is more attractive than Abits Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PUKPrudential Plc2 1 0 ABTSAbits Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is PUK or ABTS More Risky?
Prudential Plc has a beta of 0.767, which suggesting that the stock is 23.264% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abits Group, Inc. has a beta of 2.823, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 182.302%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUK or ABTS?
Prudential Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Abits Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prudential Plc pays 27.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Abits Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PUK or ABTS?
Prudential Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Abits Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Prudential Plc's net income of -- is lower than Abits Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Prudential Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.13x while Abits Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Plc is 1.91x versus 1.73x for Abits Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PUKPrudential Plc1.91x 12.13x -- -- ABTSAbits Group, Inc.1.73x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PUK or FUTU?
Futu Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Prudential Plc's net margin of 50.25%. Prudential Plc's return on equity of 12.72% beat Futu Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 31.29%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PUKPrudential Plc-- -- $23.1B FUTUFutu Holdings Ltd.95.01% $2.94 $6.5B -
What do Analysts Say About PUK or FUTU?
Prudential Plc has a consensus price target of $35.84, signalling upside risk potential of 15.16%. On the other hand Futu Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $227.55 which suggests that it could grow by 38.58%. Given that Futu Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Prudential Plc, analysts believe Futu Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Prudential Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PUKPrudential Plc2 1 0 FUTUFutu Holdings Ltd.13 1 0 -
Is PUK or FUTU More Risky?
Prudential Plc has a beta of 0.767, which suggesting that the stock is 23.264% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Futu Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.200, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.979%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUK or FUTU?
Prudential Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Futu Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Prudential Plc pays 27.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Futu Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PUK or FUTU?
Prudential Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Futu Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $824M. Prudential Plc's net income of -- is lower than Futu Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $414M. Notably, Prudential Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.13x while Futu Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 18.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Plc is 1.91x versus 8.64x for Futu Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PUKPrudential Plc1.91x 12.13x -- -- FUTUFutu Holdings Ltd.8.64x 18.35x $824M $414M
-
Which has Higher Returns PUK or MATH?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Prudential Plc's net margin of --. Prudential Plc's return on equity of 12.72% beat Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.78%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PUKPrudential Plc-- -- $23.1B MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.-- -- $21.9M -
What do Analysts Say About PUK or MATH?
Prudential Plc has a consensus price target of $35.84, signalling upside risk potential of 15.16%. On the other hand Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Prudential Plc has higher upside potential than Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd., analysts believe Prudential Plc is more attractive than Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PUKPrudential Plc2 1 0 MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is PUK or MATH More Risky?
Prudential Plc has a beta of 0.767, which suggesting that the stock is 23.264% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a beta of -0.844, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 184.427%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUK or MATH?
Prudential Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prudential Plc pays 27.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PUK or MATH?
Prudential Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Prudential Plc's net income of -- is lower than Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Prudential Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.13x while Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Plc is 1.91x versus 2.44x for Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PUKPrudential Plc1.91x 12.13x -- -- MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.2.44x 8.95x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PUK or MEGL?
Magic Empire Global Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Prudential Plc's net margin of --. Prudential Plc's return on equity of 12.72% beat Magic Empire Global Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PUKPrudential Plc-- -- $23.1B MEGLMagic Empire Global Ltd.-- -- $17.3M -
What do Analysts Say About PUK or MEGL?
Prudential Plc has a consensus price target of $35.84, signalling upside risk potential of 15.16%. On the other hand Magic Empire Global Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Prudential Plc has higher upside potential than Magic Empire Global Ltd., analysts believe Prudential Plc is more attractive than Magic Empire Global Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PUKPrudential Plc2 1 0 MEGLMagic Empire Global Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is PUK or MEGL More Risky?
Prudential Plc has a beta of 0.767, which suggesting that the stock is 23.264% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Empire Global Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUK or MEGL?
Prudential Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Magic Empire Global Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Prudential Plc pays 27.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Empire Global Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PUK or MEGL?
Prudential Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Magic Empire Global Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Prudential Plc's net income of -- is lower than Magic Empire Global Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Prudential Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.13x while Magic Empire Global Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Plc is 1.91x versus 4.55x for Magic Empire Global Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PUKPrudential Plc1.91x 12.13x -- -- MEGLMagic Empire Global Ltd.4.55x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PUK or TROO?
TROOPS, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Prudential Plc's net margin of --. Prudential Plc's return on equity of 12.72% beat TROOPS, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PUKPrudential Plc-- -- $23.1B TROOTROOPS, Inc.-- -- $72.6M -
What do Analysts Say About PUK or TROO?
Prudential Plc has a consensus price target of $35.84, signalling upside risk potential of 15.16%. On the other hand TROOPS, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Prudential Plc has higher upside potential than TROOPS, Inc., analysts believe Prudential Plc is more attractive than TROOPS, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PUKPrudential Plc2 1 0 TROOTROOPS, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is PUK or TROO More Risky?
Prudential Plc has a beta of 0.767, which suggesting that the stock is 23.264% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TROOPS, Inc. has a beta of 2.914, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 191.422%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PUK or TROO?
Prudential Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. TROOPS, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prudential Plc pays 27.48% of its earnings as a dividend. TROOPS, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PUK or TROO?
Prudential Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TROOPS, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Prudential Plc's net income of -- is lower than TROOPS, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Prudential Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.13x while TROOPS, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Plc is 1.91x versus 23.06x for TROOPS, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PUKPrudential Plc1.91x 12.13x -- -- TROOTROOPS, Inc.23.06x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
30
CORT alert for Jan 1
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc. [CORT] is down 50.44% over the past day.
Buy
75
AXSM alert for Jan 1
Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. [AXSM] is up 22.82% over the past day.
Buy
81
ZIJMY alert for Jan 1
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd. [ZIJMY] is up 1.86% over the past day.
