PUK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Prudential Plc's net margin of --. Prudential Plc's return on equity of 12.72% beat Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.78%.

Prudential Plc has a consensus price target of $35.84, signalling upside risk potential of 20.26%. On the other hand Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Prudential Plc has higher upside potential than Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd., analysts believe Prudential Plc is more attractive than Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd..

Prudential Plc has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.844% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a beta of -0.974, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 197.426%.

Prudential Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prudential Plc pays 27.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prudential Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Prudential Plc's net income of -- is lower than Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Prudential Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.54x while Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Plc is 1.83x versus 2.44x for Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Magic Empire Global Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Prudential Plc's net margin of --. Prudential Plc's return on equity of 12.72% beat Magic Empire Global Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.43%.

Prudential Plc has a consensus price target of $35.84, signalling upside risk potential of 20.26%. On the other hand Magic Empire Global Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Prudential Plc has higher upside potential than Magic Empire Global Ltd., analysts believe Prudential Plc is more attractive than Magic Empire Global Ltd..

Prudential Plc has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.844% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Empire Global Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Prudential Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Magic Empire Global Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Prudential Plc pays 27.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Empire Global Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prudential Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Magic Empire Global Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Prudential Plc's net income of -- is lower than Magic Empire Global Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Prudential Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.54x while Magic Empire Global Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Plc is 1.83x versus 4.93x for Magic Empire Global Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prudential Financial, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Prudential Plc's net margin of 8.29%. Prudential Plc's return on equity of 12.72% beat Prudential Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.79%.

Prudential Plc has a consensus price target of $35.84, signalling upside risk potential of 20.26%. On the other hand Prudential Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $116.57 which suggests that it could grow by 6.39%. Given that Prudential Plc has higher upside potential than Prudential Financial, Inc., analysts believe Prudential Plc is more attractive than Prudential Financial, Inc..

Prudential Plc has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.844% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prudential Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.976, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.401%.

Prudential Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Prudential Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 4.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. Prudential Plc pays 27.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Financial, Inc. pays out 69.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prudential Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Prudential Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $17.9B. Prudential Plc's net income of -- is lower than Prudential Financial, Inc.'s net income of $1.5B. Notably, Prudential Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.54x while Prudential Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Plc is 1.83x versus 0.67x for Prudential Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TROOPS, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Prudential Plc's net margin of --. Prudential Plc's return on equity of 12.72% beat TROOPS, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.38%.

Prudential Plc has a consensus price target of $35.84, signalling upside risk potential of 20.26%. On the other hand TROOPS, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Prudential Plc has higher upside potential than TROOPS, Inc., analysts believe Prudential Plc is more attractive than TROOPS, Inc..

Prudential Plc has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.844% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TROOPS, Inc. has a beta of 3.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 205.095%.

Prudential Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. TROOPS, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prudential Plc pays 27.48% of its earnings as a dividend. TROOPS, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prudential Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TROOPS, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Prudential Plc's net income of -- is lower than TROOPS, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Prudential Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.54x while TROOPS, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Plc is 1.83x versus 10.45x for TROOPS, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.