PRA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CNA Financial Corp. has a net margin of 0.52% compared to ProAssurance Corp.'s net margin of 10.56%. ProAssurance Corp.'s return on equity of 2.7% beat CNA Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 9.31%.

ProAssurance Corp. has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.05%. On the other hand CNA Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $45.00 which suggests that it could fall by -4.84%. Given that ProAssurance Corp. has higher upside potential than CNA Financial Corp., analysts believe ProAssurance Corp. is more attractive than CNA Financial Corp..

ProAssurance Corp. has a beta of 0.108, which suggesting that the stock is 89.172% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.401, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.902%.

ProAssurance Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CNA Financial Corp. offers a yield of 3.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. ProAssurance Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial Corp. pays out 50.05% of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ProAssurance Corp. quarterly revenues are $279.6M, which are smaller than CNA Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.8B. ProAssurance Corp.'s net income of $1.4M is lower than CNA Financial Corp.'s net income of $403M. Notably, ProAssurance Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 37.07x while CNA Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProAssurance Corp. is 1.12x versus 0.87x for CNA Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HCI Group, Inc. has a net margin of 0.52% compared to ProAssurance Corp.'s net margin of 31.38%. ProAssurance Corp.'s return on equity of 2.7% beat HCI Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 34.65%.

ProAssurance Corp. has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.05%. On the other hand HCI Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $234.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.82%. Given that HCI Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than ProAssurance Corp., analysts believe HCI Group, Inc. is more attractive than ProAssurance Corp..

ProAssurance Corp. has a beta of 0.108, which suggesting that the stock is 89.172% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HCI Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.198, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.811%.

ProAssurance Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HCI Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. ProAssurance Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HCI Group, Inc. pays out 18% of its earnings as a dividend. HCI Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ProAssurance Corp. quarterly revenues are $279.6M, which are larger than HCI Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $216.4M. ProAssurance Corp.'s net income of $1.4M is lower than HCI Group, Inc.'s net income of $67.9M. Notably, ProAssurance Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 37.07x while HCI Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProAssurance Corp. is 1.12x versus 2.82x for HCI Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 0.52% compared to ProAssurance Corp.'s net margin of 23.73%. ProAssurance Corp.'s return on equity of 2.7% beat Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 43.38%.

ProAssurance Corp. has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.05%. On the other hand Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $35.50 which suggests that it could grow by 22.08%. Given that Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than ProAssurance Corp., analysts believe Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than ProAssurance Corp..

ProAssurance Corp. has a beta of 0.108, which suggesting that the stock is 89.172% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.962, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.82%.

ProAssurance Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProAssurance Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ProAssurance Corp. quarterly revenues are $279.6M, which are larger than Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $212.5M. ProAssurance Corp.'s net income of $1.4M is lower than Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $50.4M. Notably, ProAssurance Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 37.07x while Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProAssurance Corp. is 1.12x versus 1.07x for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Overseas Shipholding Group has a net margin of 0.52% compared to ProAssurance Corp.'s net margin of --. ProAssurance Corp.'s return on equity of 2.7% beat Overseas Shipholding Group's return on equity of --.

ProAssurance Corp. has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.05%. On the other hand Overseas Shipholding Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProAssurance Corp. has higher upside potential than Overseas Shipholding Group, analysts believe ProAssurance Corp. is more attractive than Overseas Shipholding Group.

ProAssurance Corp. has a beta of 0.108, which suggesting that the stock is 89.172% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Overseas Shipholding Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

ProAssurance Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Overseas Shipholding Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProAssurance Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Overseas Shipholding Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ProAssurance Corp. quarterly revenues are $279.6M, which are larger than Overseas Shipholding Group quarterly revenues of --. ProAssurance Corp.'s net income of $1.4M is higher than Overseas Shipholding Group's net income of --. Notably, ProAssurance Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 37.07x while Overseas Shipholding Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProAssurance Corp. is 1.12x versus -- for Overseas Shipholding Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.