POST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has a net margin of 2.27% compared to Post Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -5.61%. Post Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.56% beat The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -78.55%.

Post Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $123.22, signalling upside risk potential of 23.57%. On the other hand The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.41 which suggests that it could grow by 125.58%. Given that The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Post Holdings, Inc., analysts believe The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. is more attractive than Post Holdings, Inc..

Post Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.455, which suggesting that the stock is 54.483% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.607, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.35%.

Post Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Post Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Post Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $367.9M. Post Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $51.1M is higher than The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s net income of -$20.6M. Notably, Post Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.18x while The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Post Holdings, Inc. is 0.77x versus 0.06x for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingredion, Inc. has a net margin of 2.27% compared to Post Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 9.47%. Post Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.56% beat Ingredion, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.4%.

Post Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $123.22, signalling upside risk potential of 23.57%. On the other hand Ingredion, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $124.33 which suggests that it could grow by 14.16%. Given that Post Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ingredion, Inc., analysts believe Post Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Ingredion, Inc..

Post Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.455, which suggesting that the stock is 54.483% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingredion, Inc. has a beta of 0.724, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.613%.

Post Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ingredion, Inc. offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. Post Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ingredion, Inc. pays out 32.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingredion, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Post Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Ingredion, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Post Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $51.1M is lower than Ingredion, Inc.'s net income of $172M. Notably, Post Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.18x while Ingredion, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Post Holdings, Inc. is 0.77x versus 0.99x for Ingredion, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz Co. has a net margin of 2.27% compared to Post Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 9.83%. Post Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.56% beat The Kraft Heinz Co.'s return on equity of -9.47%.

Post Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $123.22, signalling upside risk potential of 23.57%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz Co. has an analysts' consensus of $27.08 which suggests that it could grow by 8.19%. Given that Post Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Kraft Heinz Co., analysts believe Post Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than The Kraft Heinz Co..

Post Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.455, which suggesting that the stock is 54.483% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz Co. has a beta of 0.096, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.44%.

Post Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Kraft Heinz Co. offers a yield of 6.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Post Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz Co. pays out 70.85% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Post Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz Co. quarterly revenues of $6.2B. Post Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $51.1M is lower than The Kraft Heinz Co.'s net income of $613M. Notably, Post Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.18x while The Kraft Heinz Co.'s PE ratio is 13.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Post Holdings, Inc. is 0.77x versus 1.19x for The Kraft Heinz Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a net margin of 2.27% compared to Post Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -7.56%. Post Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.56% beat Laird Superfood, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.38%.

Post Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $123.22, signalling upside risk potential of 23.57%. On the other hand Laird Superfood, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $9.67 which suggests that it could grow by 294.56%. Given that Laird Superfood, Inc. has higher upside potential than Post Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Laird Superfood, Inc. is more attractive than Post Holdings, Inc..

Post Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.455, which suggesting that the stock is 54.483% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laird Superfood, Inc. has a beta of 2.351, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 135.079%.

Post Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laird Superfood, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Post Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laird Superfood, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Post Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Laird Superfood, Inc. quarterly revenues of $12.9M. Post Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $51.1M is higher than Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net income of -$975.1K. Notably, Post Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.18x while Laird Superfood, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Post Holdings, Inc. is 0.77x versus 0.53x for Laird Superfood, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.