HLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has a net margin of 3.38% compared to Herbalife Ltd.'s net margin of -3.52%. Herbalife Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.'s return on equity of -43.51%.

Herbalife Ltd. has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling downside risk potential of -15.1%. On the other hand Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 507.9%. Given that Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has higher upside potential than Herbalife Ltd., analysts believe Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. is more attractive than Herbalife Ltd..

Herbalife Ltd. has a beta of 0.818, which suggesting that the stock is 18.193% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Herbalife Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Herbalife Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Herbalife Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. quarterly revenues of $20.3M. Herbalife Ltd.'s net income of $43.1M is higher than Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.'s net income of -$712.4K. Notably, Herbalife Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.27x while Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Herbalife Ltd. is 0.34x versus 0.05x for Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a net margin of 3.38% compared to Herbalife Ltd.'s net margin of -7.56%. Herbalife Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Laird Superfood, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.38%.

Herbalife Ltd. has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling downside risk potential of -15.1%. On the other hand Laird Superfood, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.67 which suggests that it could grow by 132.32%. Given that Laird Superfood, Inc. has higher upside potential than Herbalife Ltd., analysts believe Laird Superfood, Inc. is more attractive than Herbalife Ltd..

Herbalife Ltd. has a beta of 0.818, which suggesting that the stock is 18.193% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laird Superfood, Inc. has a beta of 2.387, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 138.679%.

Herbalife Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laird Superfood, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Herbalife Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laird Superfood, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Herbalife Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Laird Superfood, Inc. quarterly revenues of $12.9M. Herbalife Ltd.'s net income of $43.1M is higher than Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net income of -$975.1K. Notably, Herbalife Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.27x while Laird Superfood, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Herbalife Ltd. is 0.34x versus 0.72x for Laird Superfood, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Post Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 3.38% compared to Herbalife Ltd.'s net margin of 2.27%. Herbalife Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Post Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.56%.

Herbalife Ltd. has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling downside risk potential of -15.1%. On the other hand Post Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $124.38 which suggests that it could grow by 27.19%. Given that Post Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Herbalife Ltd., analysts believe Post Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Herbalife Ltd..

Herbalife Ltd. has a beta of 0.818, which suggesting that the stock is 18.193% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Post Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.449, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.073%.

Herbalife Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Post Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Herbalife Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Post Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Herbalife Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Post Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Herbalife Ltd.'s net income of $43.1M is lower than Post Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $51.1M. Notably, Herbalife Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.27x while Post Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Herbalife Ltd. is 0.34x versus 0.75x for Post Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

USANA Health Sciences, Inc. has a net margin of 3.38% compared to Herbalife Ltd.'s net margin of -3.12%. Herbalife Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat USANA Health Sciences, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.06%.

Herbalife Ltd. has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling downside risk potential of -15.1%. On the other hand USANA Health Sciences, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $39.00 which suggests that it could grow by 82.5%. Given that USANA Health Sciences, Inc. has higher upside potential than Herbalife Ltd., analysts believe USANA Health Sciences, Inc. is more attractive than Herbalife Ltd..

Herbalife Ltd. has a beta of 0.818, which suggesting that the stock is 18.193% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison USANA Health Sciences, Inc. has a beta of 0.648, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.244%.

Herbalife Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. USANA Health Sciences, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Herbalife Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. USANA Health Sciences, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Herbalife Ltd. quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than USANA Health Sciences, Inc. quarterly revenues of $213.7M. Herbalife Ltd.'s net income of $43.1M is higher than USANA Health Sciences, Inc.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Herbalife Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.27x while USANA Health Sciences, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Herbalife Ltd. is 0.34x versus 0.44x for USANA Health Sciences, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.