PLOW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 4.8% compared to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s net margin of 0.59%. Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.38% beat American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.33%.

Douglas Dynamics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $38.75, signalling upside risk potential of 3.06%. On the other hand American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.17 which suggests that it could grow by 0.39%. Given that Douglas Dynamics, Inc. has higher upside potential than American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Douglas Dynamics, Inc. is more attractive than American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc..

Douglas Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.264, which suggesting that the stock is 26.371% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.576, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.612%.

Douglas Dynamics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Douglas Dynamics, Inc. pays 49.9% of its earnings as a dividend. American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Douglas Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $162.1M, which are smaller than American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $7.8M is lower than American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $8.8M. Notably, Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.45x while American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Douglas Dynamics, Inc. is 1.44x versus 0.17x for American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BorgWarner, Inc. has a net margin of 4.8% compared to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s net margin of 4.82%. Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.38% beat BorgWarner, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.15%.

Douglas Dynamics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $38.75, signalling upside risk potential of 3.06%. On the other hand BorgWarner, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $50.54 which suggests that it could grow by 5.53%. Given that BorgWarner, Inc. has higher upside potential than Douglas Dynamics, Inc., analysts believe BorgWarner, Inc. is more attractive than Douglas Dynamics, Inc..

Douglas Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.264, which suggesting that the stock is 26.371% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BorgWarner, Inc. has a beta of 1.066, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.566%.

Douglas Dynamics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. BorgWarner, Inc. offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Douglas Dynamics, Inc. pays 49.9% of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner, Inc. pays out 29.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Douglas Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $162.1M, which are smaller than BorgWarner, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $7.8M is lower than BorgWarner, Inc.'s net income of $173M. Notably, Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.45x while BorgWarner, Inc.'s PE ratio is 76.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Douglas Dynamics, Inc. is 1.44x versus 0.74x for BorgWarner, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monro, Inc. has a net margin of 4.8% compared to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s net margin of 1.96%. Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.38% beat Monro, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.05%.

Douglas Dynamics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $38.75, signalling upside risk potential of 3.06%. On the other hand Monro, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.67 which suggests that it could fall by -1.59%. Given that Douglas Dynamics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Monro, Inc., analysts believe Douglas Dynamics, Inc. is more attractive than Monro, Inc..

Douglas Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.264, which suggesting that the stock is 26.371% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monro, Inc. has a beta of 1.006, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.647%.

Douglas Dynamics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. Monro, Inc. offers a yield of 5.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Douglas Dynamics, Inc. pays 49.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Monro, Inc. pays out 673.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Monro, Inc.'s is not.

Douglas Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $162.1M, which are smaller than Monro, Inc. quarterly revenues of $288.9M. Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $7.8M is higher than Monro, Inc.'s net income of $5.7M. Notably, Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.45x while Monro, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Douglas Dynamics, Inc. is 1.44x versus 0.54x for Monro, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. has a net margin of 4.8% compared to Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s net margin of -0.97%. Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.38% beat Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.95%.

Douglas Dynamics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $38.75, signalling upside risk potential of 3.06%. On the other hand Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 53.14%. Given that Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. has higher upside potential than Douglas Dynamics, Inc., analysts believe Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. is more attractive than Douglas Dynamics, Inc..

Douglas Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.264, which suggesting that the stock is 26.371% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. has a beta of 1.285, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.543%.

Douglas Dynamics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Douglas Dynamics, Inc. pays 49.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Douglas Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $162.1M, which are smaller than Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. quarterly revenues of $221.5M. Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $7.8M is higher than Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Douglas Dynamics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.45x while Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.'s PE ratio is 111.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Douglas Dynamics, Inc. is 1.44x versus 0.33x for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.