PLOW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dorman Products has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Douglas Dynamics's net margin of 11.33%. Douglas Dynamics's return on equity of 23.2% beat Dorman Products's return on equity of 17.2%.

Douglas Dynamics has a consensus price target of $33.67, signalling upside risk potential of 32.03%. On the other hand Dorman Products has an analysts' consensus of $144.75 which suggests that it could grow by 17.69%. Given that Douglas Dynamics has higher upside potential than Dorman Products, analysts believe Douglas Dynamics is more attractive than Dorman Products.

Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.248, which suggesting that the stock is 24.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorman Products has a beta of 0.857, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.306%.

Douglas Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.63%. Dorman Products offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Douglas Dynamics pays 48.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Dorman Products pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Douglas Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Douglas Dynamics quarterly revenues are $143.5M, which are smaller than Dorman Products quarterly revenues of $507.7M. Douglas Dynamics's net income of $7.9M is lower than Dorman Products's net income of $57.5M. Notably, Douglas Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.90x while Dorman Products's PE ratio is 17.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Douglas Dynamics is 1.05x versus 1.85x for Dorman Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Douglas Dynamics's net margin of --. Douglas Dynamics's return on equity of 23.2% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Douglas Dynamics has a consensus price target of $33.67, signalling upside risk potential of 32.03%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.03%. Given that Douglas Dynamics has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Douglas Dynamics is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.248, which suggesting that the stock is 24.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.762, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.173%.

Douglas Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.63%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Douglas Dynamics pays 48.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Douglas Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Douglas Dynamics quarterly revenues are $143.5M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Douglas Dynamics's net income of $7.9M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Douglas Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.90x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Douglas Dynamics is 1.05x versus 140.11x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monro has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Douglas Dynamics's net margin of 1.5%. Douglas Dynamics's return on equity of 23.2% beat Monro's return on equity of 3.03%.

Douglas Dynamics has a consensus price target of $33.67, signalling upside risk potential of 32.03%. On the other hand Monro has an analysts' consensus of $18.33 which suggests that it could grow by 37.33%. Given that Monro has higher upside potential than Douglas Dynamics, analysts believe Monro is more attractive than Douglas Dynamics.

Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.248, which suggesting that the stock is 24.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monro has a beta of 0.953, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.745%.

Douglas Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.63%. Monro offers a yield of 8.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Douglas Dynamics pays 48.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Monro pays out 94.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Douglas Dynamics quarterly revenues are $143.5M, which are smaller than Monro quarterly revenues of $305.8M. Douglas Dynamics's net income of $7.9M is higher than Monro's net income of $4.6M. Notably, Douglas Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.90x while Monro's PE ratio is 20.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Douglas Dynamics is 1.05x versus 0.34x for Monro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Motorcar Parts of America has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Douglas Dynamics's net margin of 1.23%. Douglas Dynamics's return on equity of 23.2% beat Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity of -6.4%.

Douglas Dynamics has a consensus price target of $33.67, signalling upside risk potential of 32.03%. On the other hand Motorcar Parts of America has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 54.19%. Given that Motorcar Parts of America has higher upside potential than Douglas Dynamics, analysts believe Motorcar Parts of America is more attractive than Douglas Dynamics.

Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.248, which suggesting that the stock is 24.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.368%.

Douglas Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.63%. Motorcar Parts of America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Douglas Dynamics pays 48.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Motorcar Parts of America pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Douglas Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Douglas Dynamics quarterly revenues are $143.5M, which are smaller than Motorcar Parts of America quarterly revenues of $186.2M. Douglas Dynamics's net income of $7.9M is higher than Motorcar Parts of America's net income of $2.3M. Notably, Douglas Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.90x while Motorcar Parts of America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Douglas Dynamics is 1.05x versus 0.24x for Motorcar Parts of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.