PLOW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dorman Products has a net margin of 24.93% compared to Douglas Dynamics's net margin of 10.97%. Douglas Dynamics's return on equity of 23.38% beat Dorman Products's return on equity of 15.73%.

Douglas Dynamics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.66%. On the other hand Dorman Products has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4.09%. Given that Douglas Dynamics has higher upside potential than Dorman Products, analysts believe Douglas Dynamics is more attractive than Dorman Products.

Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.200, which suggesting that the stock is 20.029% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorman Products has a beta of 0.875, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.519%.

Douglas Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.99%. Dorman Products offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Douglas Dynamics pays 115.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Dorman Products pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Douglas Dynamics quarterly revenues are $129.4M, which are smaller than Dorman Products quarterly revenues of $503.8M. Douglas Dynamics's net income of $32.3M is lower than Dorman Products's net income of $55.3M. Notably, Douglas Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.29x while Dorman Products's PE ratio is 22.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Douglas Dynamics is 0.98x versus 2.10x for Dorman Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 24.93% compared to Douglas Dynamics's net margin of --. Douglas Dynamics's return on equity of 23.38% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Douglas Dynamics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.66%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -26.74%. Given that Douglas Dynamics has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Douglas Dynamics is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.200, which suggesting that the stock is 20.029% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.489%.

Douglas Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.99%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Douglas Dynamics pays 115.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Douglas Dynamics quarterly revenues are $129.4M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Douglas Dynamics's net income of $32.3M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Douglas Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.29x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Douglas Dynamics is 0.98x versus 273.78x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monro has a net margin of 24.93% compared to Douglas Dynamics's net margin of 1.87%. Douglas Dynamics's return on equity of 23.38% beat Monro's return on equity of 4.12%.

Douglas Dynamics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.66%. On the other hand Monro has an analysts' consensus of $29.75 which suggests that it could grow by 18.29%. Given that Douglas Dynamics has higher upside potential than Monro, analysts believe Douglas Dynamics is more attractive than Monro.

Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.200, which suggesting that the stock is 20.029% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monro has a beta of 1.107, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.677%.

Douglas Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.99%. Monro offers a yield of 4.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Douglas Dynamics pays 115.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Monro pays out 94.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Monro's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Douglas Dynamics's is not.

Douglas Dynamics quarterly revenues are $129.4M, which are smaller than Monro quarterly revenues of $301.4M. Douglas Dynamics's net income of $32.3M is higher than Monro's net income of $5.6M. Notably, Douglas Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.29x while Monro's PE ratio is 28.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Douglas Dynamics is 0.98x versus 0.65x for Monro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Motorcar Parts of America has a net margin of 24.93% compared to Douglas Dynamics's net margin of -1.42%. Douglas Dynamics's return on equity of 23.38% beat Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity of -23.51%.

Douglas Dynamics has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.66%. On the other hand Motorcar Parts of America has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 72.2%. Given that Motorcar Parts of America has higher upside potential than Douglas Dynamics, analysts believe Motorcar Parts of America is more attractive than Douglas Dynamics.

Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.200, which suggesting that the stock is 20.029% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.527, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.728%.

Douglas Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.99%. Motorcar Parts of America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Douglas Dynamics pays 115.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Motorcar Parts of America pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Douglas Dynamics quarterly revenues are $129.4M, which are smaller than Motorcar Parts of America quarterly revenues of $208.2M. Douglas Dynamics's net income of $32.3M is higher than Motorcar Parts of America's net income of -$3M. Notably, Douglas Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.29x while Motorcar Parts of America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Douglas Dynamics is 0.98x versus 0.22x for Motorcar Parts of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.