OXM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hooker Furnishings has a net margin of 6.66% compared to Oxford Industries's net margin of -3.58%. Oxford Industries's return on equity of 13.28% beat Hooker Furnishings's return on equity of -5.48%.

Oxford Industries has a consensus price target of $47.75, signalling downside risk potential of -0.65%. On the other hand Hooker Furnishings has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 56.11%. Given that Hooker Furnishings has higher upside potential than Oxford Industries, analysts believe Hooker Furnishings is more attractive than Oxford Industries.

Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.086% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hooker Furnishings has a beta of 1.374, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.386%.

Oxford Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.62%. Hooker Furnishings offers a yield of 8.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Oxford Industries pays 46.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Hooker Furnishings pays out -78.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Oxford Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oxford Industries quarterly revenues are $392.9M, which are larger than Hooker Furnishings quarterly revenues of $85.3M. Oxford Industries's net income of $26.2M is higher than Hooker Furnishings's net income of -$3.1M. Notably, Oxford Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.33x while Hooker Furnishings's PE ratio is 121.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oxford Industries is 0.50x versus 0.30x for Hooker Furnishings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Movado Group has a net margin of 6.66% compared to Oxford Industries's net margin of 1.08%. Oxford Industries's return on equity of 13.28% beat Movado Group's return on equity of 3.39%.

Oxford Industries has a consensus price target of $47.75, signalling downside risk potential of -0.65%. On the other hand Movado Group has an analysts' consensus of $31.50 which suggests that it could grow by 90.22%. Given that Movado Group has higher upside potential than Oxford Industries, analysts believe Movado Group is more attractive than Oxford Industries.

Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.086% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Movado Group has a beta of 1.189, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.901%.

Oxford Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.62%. Movado Group offers a yield of 8.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Oxford Industries pays 46.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Movado Group pays out 169.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Oxford Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Movado Group's is not.

Oxford Industries quarterly revenues are $392.9M, which are larger than Movado Group quarterly revenues of $131.8M. Oxford Industries's net income of $26.2M is higher than Movado Group's net income of $1.4M. Notably, Oxford Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.33x while Movado Group's PE ratio is 20.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oxford Industries is 0.50x versus 0.58x for Movado Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Motorcar Parts of America has a net margin of 6.66% compared to Oxford Industries's net margin of -0.37%. Oxford Industries's return on equity of 13.28% beat Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity of -7.28%.

Oxford Industries has a consensus price target of $47.75, signalling downside risk potential of -0.65%. On the other hand Motorcar Parts of America has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.02%. Given that Motorcar Parts of America has higher upside potential than Oxford Industries, analysts believe Motorcar Parts of America is more attractive than Oxford Industries.

Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.086% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.355, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.493%.

Oxford Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.62%. Motorcar Parts of America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oxford Industries pays 46.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Motorcar Parts of America pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oxford Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oxford Industries quarterly revenues are $392.9M, which are larger than Motorcar Parts of America quarterly revenues of $193.1M. Oxford Industries's net income of $26.2M is higher than Motorcar Parts of America's net income of -$722K. Notably, Oxford Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.33x while Motorcar Parts of America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oxford Industries is 0.50x versus 0.31x for Motorcar Parts of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 6.66% compared to Oxford Industries's net margin of 2.12%. Oxford Industries's return on equity of 13.28% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Oxford Industries has a consensus price target of $47.75, signalling downside risk potential of -0.65%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $304.90 which suggests that it could grow by 3.05%. Given that Tesla has higher upside potential than Oxford Industries, analysts believe Tesla is more attractive than Oxford Industries.

Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.361, which suggesting that the stock is 36.086% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.394, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.423%.

Oxford Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.62%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oxford Industries pays 46.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oxford Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oxford Industries quarterly revenues are $392.9M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Oxford Industries's net income of $26.2M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Oxford Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.33x while Tesla's PE ratio is 162.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oxford Industries is 0.50x versus 10.84x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.