OPY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 8.33% compared to Oppenheimer Holdings's net margin of -99.28%. Oppenheimer Holdings's return on equity of 9.12% beat Mawson Infrastructure Group's return on equity of -315.99%.

Oppenheimer Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -39.28%. On the other hand Mawson Infrastructure Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 393.02%. Given that Mawson Infrastructure Group has higher upside potential than Oppenheimer Holdings, analysts believe Mawson Infrastructure Group is more attractive than Oppenheimer Holdings.

Oppenheimer Holdings has a beta of 1.200, which suggesting that the stock is 20.028% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mawson Infrastructure Group has a beta of 3.937, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 293.743%.

Oppenheimer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Mawson Infrastructure Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oppenheimer Holdings pays 9.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Mawson Infrastructure Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oppenheimer Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oppenheimer Holdings quarterly revenues are $367.8M, which are larger than Mawson Infrastructure Group quarterly revenues of $12.3M. Oppenheimer Holdings's net income of $30.7M is higher than Mawson Infrastructure Group's net income of -$12.2M. Notably, Oppenheimer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.07x while Mawson Infrastructure Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oppenheimer Holdings is 0.47x versus 0.18x for Mawson Infrastructure Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MarketAxess Holdings has a net margin of 8.33% compared to Oppenheimer Holdings's net margin of 7.22%. Oppenheimer Holdings's return on equity of 9.12% beat MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 16%.

Oppenheimer Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -39.28%. On the other hand MarketAxess Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $235.17 which suggests that it could grow by 3.95%. Given that MarketAxess Holdings has higher upside potential than Oppenheimer Holdings, analysts believe MarketAxess Holdings is more attractive than Oppenheimer Holdings.

Oppenheimer Holdings has a beta of 1.200, which suggesting that the stock is 20.028% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 0.892, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.82%.

Oppenheimer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. MarketAxess Holdings offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Oppenheimer Holdings pays 9.57% of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings pays out 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oppenheimer Holdings quarterly revenues are $367.8M, which are larger than MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues of $208.6M. Oppenheimer Holdings's net income of $30.7M is higher than MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $15.1M. Notably, Oppenheimer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.07x while MarketAxess Holdings's PE ratio is 39.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oppenheimer Holdings is 0.47x versus 10.43x for MarketAxess Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of 8.33% compared to Oppenheimer Holdings's net margin of -183.64%. Oppenheimer Holdings's return on equity of 9.12% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of -14.35%.

Oppenheimer Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -39.28%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $15.40 which suggests that it could grow by 82.47%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than Oppenheimer Holdings, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than Oppenheimer Holdings.

Oppenheimer Holdings has a beta of 1.200, which suggesting that the stock is 20.028% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.747, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 374.659%.

Oppenheimer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oppenheimer Holdings pays 9.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oppenheimer Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oppenheimer Holdings quarterly revenues are $367.8M, which are larger than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $161.4M. Oppenheimer Holdings's net income of $30.7M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$296.4M. Notably, Oppenheimer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.07x while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 24.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oppenheimer Holdings is 0.47x versus 5.64x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Siebert Financial has a net margin of 8.33% compared to Oppenheimer Holdings's net margin of 17.53%. Oppenheimer Holdings's return on equity of 9.12% beat Siebert Financial's return on equity of 14.12%.

Oppenheimer Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -39.28%. On the other hand Siebert Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Oppenheimer Holdings has higher upside potential than Siebert Financial, analysts believe Oppenheimer Holdings is more attractive than Siebert Financial.

Oppenheimer Holdings has a beta of 1.200, which suggesting that the stock is 20.028% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siebert Financial has a beta of 0.503, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.665%.

Oppenheimer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Siebert Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oppenheimer Holdings pays 9.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Siebert Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oppenheimer Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oppenheimer Holdings quarterly revenues are $367.8M, which are larger than Siebert Financial quarterly revenues of $21.8M. Oppenheimer Holdings's net income of $30.7M is higher than Siebert Financial's net income of $3.8M. Notably, Oppenheimer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.07x while Siebert Financial's PE ratio is 11.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oppenheimer Holdings is 0.47x versus 1.86x for Siebert Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.