OOMA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Creative Realities, Inc. has a net margin of 2.06% compared to Ooma, Inc.'s net margin of -74.54%. Ooma, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.58% beat Creative Realities, Inc.'s return on equity of -33.9%.

Ooma, Inc. has a consensus price target of $18.63, signalling upside risk potential of 56.78%. On the other hand Creative Realities, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.13 which suggests that it could grow by 187.1%. Given that Creative Realities, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ooma, Inc., analysts believe Creative Realities, Inc. is more attractive than Ooma, Inc..

Ooma, Inc. has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 33.981% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Creative Realities, Inc. has a beta of 1.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.064%.

Ooma, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Creative Realities, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ooma, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Creative Realities, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ooma, Inc. quarterly revenues are $67.6M, which are larger than Creative Realities, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.5M. Ooma, Inc.'s net income of $1.4M is higher than Creative Realities, Inc.'s net income of -$7.9M. Notably, Ooma, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 149.25x while Creative Realities, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ooma, Inc. is 1.24x versus 0.67x for Creative Realities, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cycurion, Inc. has a net margin of 2.06% compared to Ooma, Inc.'s net margin of -84.53%. Ooma, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.58% beat Cycurion, Inc.'s return on equity of -213.22%.

Ooma, Inc. has a consensus price target of $18.63, signalling upside risk potential of 56.78%. On the other hand Cycurion, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ooma, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cycurion, Inc., analysts believe Ooma, Inc. is more attractive than Cycurion, Inc..

Ooma, Inc. has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 33.981% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cycurion, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ooma, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cycurion, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ooma, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cycurion, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ooma, Inc. quarterly revenues are $67.6M, which are larger than Cycurion, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8M. Ooma, Inc.'s net income of $1.4M is higher than Cycurion, Inc.'s net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Ooma, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 149.25x while Cycurion, Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ooma, Inc. is 1.24x versus 0.12x for Cycurion, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CID Holdco, Inc. has a net margin of 2.06% compared to Ooma, Inc.'s net margin of -541.63%. Ooma, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.58% beat CID Holdco, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Ooma, Inc. has a consensus price target of $18.63, signalling upside risk potential of 56.78%. On the other hand CID Holdco, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ooma, Inc. has higher upside potential than CID Holdco, Inc., analysts believe Ooma, Inc. is more attractive than CID Holdco, Inc..

Ooma, Inc. has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 33.981% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CID Holdco, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ooma, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CID Holdco, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ooma, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CID Holdco, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ooma, Inc. quarterly revenues are $67.6M, which are larger than CID Holdco, Inc. quarterly revenues of $778.5K. Ooma, Inc.'s net income of $1.4M is higher than CID Holdco, Inc.'s net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Ooma, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 149.25x while CID Holdco, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ooma, Inc. is 1.24x versus 31.67x for CID Holdco, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PDF Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of 2.06% compared to Ooma, Inc.'s net margin of 2.27%. Ooma, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.58% beat PDF Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.02%.

Ooma, Inc. has a consensus price target of $18.63, signalling upside risk potential of 56.78%. On the other hand PDF Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $34.75 which suggests that it could grow by 15.3%. Given that Ooma, Inc. has higher upside potential than PDF Solutions, Inc., analysts believe Ooma, Inc. is more attractive than PDF Solutions, Inc..

Ooma, Inc. has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 33.981% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PDF Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.559, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.944%.

Ooma, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PDF Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ooma, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PDF Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ooma, Inc. quarterly revenues are $67.6M, which are larger than PDF Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of $57.1M. Ooma, Inc.'s net income of $1.4M is higher than PDF Solutions, Inc.'s net income of $1.3M. Notably, Ooma, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 149.25x while PDF Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is 1,213.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ooma, Inc. is 1.24x versus 5.73x for PDF Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.