CREX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aspen Technology has a net margin of 0.37% compared to Creative Realities's net margin of -28.01%. Creative Realities's return on equity of 2.65% beat Aspen Technology's return on equity of -0.28%.

Creative Realities has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 168.82%. On the other hand Aspen Technology has an analysts' consensus of $248.89 which suggests that it could fall by -0.86%. Given that Creative Realities has higher upside potential than Aspen Technology, analysts believe Creative Realities is more attractive than Aspen Technology.

Creative Realities has a beta of 3.243, which suggesting that the stock is 224.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aspen Technology has a beta of 0.764, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.608%.

Creative Realities has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aspen Technology offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Creative Realities pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aspen Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Creative Realities quarterly revenues are $14.4M, which are smaller than Aspen Technology quarterly revenues of $215.9M. Creative Realities's net income of $54K is higher than Aspen Technology's net income of -$60.5M. Notably, Creative Realities's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.60x while Aspen Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Creative Realities is 0.54x versus 14.57x for Aspen Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Digimarc has a net margin of 0.37% compared to Creative Realities's net margin of -113.88%. Creative Realities's return on equity of 2.65% beat Digimarc's return on equity of -56.45%.

Creative Realities has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 168.82%. On the other hand Digimarc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -21.77%. Given that Creative Realities has higher upside potential than Digimarc, analysts believe Creative Realities is more attractive than Digimarc.

Creative Realities has a beta of 3.243, which suggesting that the stock is 224.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Digimarc has a beta of 1.667, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.742%.

Creative Realities has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Digimarc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Creative Realities pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Digimarc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Creative Realities quarterly revenues are $14.4M, which are larger than Digimarc quarterly revenues of $9.4M. Creative Realities's net income of $54K is higher than Digimarc's net income of -$10.8M. Notably, Creative Realities's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.60x while Digimarc's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Creative Realities is 0.54x versus 23.48x for Digimarc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matterport has a net margin of 0.37% compared to Creative Realities's net margin of -87.69%. Creative Realities's return on equity of 2.65% beat Matterport's return on equity of -53.91%.

Creative Realities has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 168.82%. On the other hand Matterport has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 10.89%. Given that Creative Realities has higher upside potential than Matterport, analysts believe Creative Realities is more attractive than Matterport.

Creative Realities has a beta of 3.243, which suggesting that the stock is 224.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matterport has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Creative Realities has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Matterport offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Creative Realities pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matterport pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Creative Realities quarterly revenues are $14.4M, which are smaller than Matterport quarterly revenues of $43.8M. Creative Realities's net income of $54K is higher than Matterport's net income of -$38.4M. Notably, Creative Realities's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.60x while Matterport's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Creative Realities is 0.54x versus 9.44x for Matterport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PDF Solutions has a net margin of 0.37% compared to Creative Realities's net margin of 4.75%. Creative Realities's return on equity of 2.65% beat PDF Solutions's return on equity of 1.92%.

Creative Realities has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 168.82%. On the other hand PDF Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $42.25 which suggests that it could grow by 49.14%. Given that Creative Realities has higher upside potential than PDF Solutions, analysts believe Creative Realities is more attractive than PDF Solutions.

Creative Realities has a beta of 3.243, which suggesting that the stock is 224.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PDF Solutions has a beta of 1.527, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.73%.

Creative Realities has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PDF Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Creative Realities pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PDF Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Creative Realities quarterly revenues are $14.4M, which are smaller than PDF Solutions quarterly revenues of $46.4M. Creative Realities's net income of $54K is lower than PDF Solutions's net income of $2.2M. Notably, Creative Realities's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.60x while PDF Solutions's PE ratio is 257.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Creative Realities is 0.54x versus 6.46x for PDF Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.