ONTO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jabil has a net margin of 24.04% compared to Onto Innovation's net margin of 2.84%. Onto Innovation's return on equity of 11.69% beat Jabil's return on equity of 34.97%.

Onto Innovation has a consensus price target of $145.80, signalling upside risk potential of 48.62%. On the other hand Jabil has an analysts' consensus of $221.02 which suggests that it could grow by 1.25%. Given that Onto Innovation has higher upside potential than Jabil, analysts believe Onto Innovation is more attractive than Jabil.

Onto Innovation has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.283% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jabil has a beta of 1.203, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.263%.

Onto Innovation has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jabil offers a yield of 0.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Onto Innovation pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil pays out 3.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Onto Innovation quarterly revenues are $266.6M, which are smaller than Jabil quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Onto Innovation's net income of $64.1M is lower than Jabil's net income of $222M. Notably, Onto Innovation's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.19x while Jabil's PE ratio is 42.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Onto Innovation is 4.75x versus 0.86x for Jabil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plexus has a net margin of 24.04% compared to Onto Innovation's net margin of 3.99%. Onto Innovation's return on equity of 11.69% beat Plexus's return on equity of 10.94%.

Onto Innovation has a consensus price target of $145.80, signalling upside risk potential of 48.62%. On the other hand Plexus has an analysts' consensus of $153.40 which suggests that it could grow by 11.88%. Given that Onto Innovation has higher upside potential than Plexus, analysts believe Onto Innovation is more attractive than Plexus.

Onto Innovation has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.283% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plexus has a beta of 0.804, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.602%.

Onto Innovation has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plexus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Onto Innovation pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plexus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Onto Innovation quarterly revenues are $266.6M, which are smaller than Plexus quarterly revenues of $980.2M. Onto Innovation's net income of $64.1M is higher than Plexus's net income of $39.1M. Notably, Onto Innovation's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.19x while Plexus's PE ratio is 26.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Onto Innovation is 4.75x versus 0.96x for Plexus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sanmina has a net margin of 24.04% compared to Onto Innovation's net margin of 3.24%. Onto Innovation's return on equity of 11.69% beat Sanmina's return on equity of 10.22%.

Onto Innovation has a consensus price target of $145.80, signalling upside risk potential of 48.62%. On the other hand Sanmina has an analysts' consensus of $107.50 which suggests that it could grow by 3.2%. Given that Onto Innovation has higher upside potential than Sanmina, analysts believe Onto Innovation is more attractive than Sanmina.

Onto Innovation has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.283% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sanmina has a beta of 1.169, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.871%.

Onto Innovation has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sanmina offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Onto Innovation pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sanmina pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Onto Innovation quarterly revenues are $266.6M, which are smaller than Sanmina quarterly revenues of $2B. Onto Innovation's net income of $64.1M is lower than Sanmina's net income of $64.2M. Notably, Onto Innovation's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.19x while Sanmina's PE ratio is 24.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Onto Innovation is 4.75x versus 0.74x for Sanmina. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolfspeed has a net margin of 24.04% compared to Onto Innovation's net margin of -153.99%. Onto Innovation's return on equity of 11.69% beat Wolfspeed's return on equity of -178.72%.

Onto Innovation has a consensus price target of $145.80, signalling upside risk potential of 48.62%. On the other hand Wolfspeed has an analysts' consensus of $4.20 which suggests that it could grow by 178.15%. Given that Wolfspeed has higher upside potential than Onto Innovation, analysts believe Wolfspeed is more attractive than Onto Innovation.

Onto Innovation has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.283% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolfspeed has a beta of 1.091, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.116%.

Onto Innovation has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wolfspeed offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Onto Innovation pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wolfspeed pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Onto Innovation quarterly revenues are $266.6M, which are larger than Wolfspeed quarterly revenues of $185.4M. Onto Innovation's net income of $64.1M is higher than Wolfspeed's net income of -$285.5M. Notably, Onto Innovation's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.19x while Wolfspeed's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Onto Innovation is 4.75x versus 0.27x for Wolfspeed. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.