NUS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amcon Distributing has a net margin of 1.93% compared to Nu Skin Enterprises's net margin of 0.17%. Nu Skin Enterprises's return on equity of -13.41% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 4.01%.

Nu Skin Enterprises has a consensus price target of $6.92, signalling upside risk potential of 4.8%. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nu Skin Enterprises has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe Nu Skin Enterprises is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.

Nu Skin Enterprises has a beta of 1.200, which suggesting that the stock is 20.046% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.574, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.577%.

Nu Skin Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.64%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Nu Skin Enterprises pays 903.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Nu Skin Enterprises's is not.

Nu Skin Enterprises quarterly revenues are $430.1M, which are smaller than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $746.3M. Nu Skin Enterprises's net income of $8.3M is higher than Amcon Distributing's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Nu Skin Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 19.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nu Skin Enterprises is 0.18x versus 0.03x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sadot Group has a net margin of 1.93% compared to Nu Skin Enterprises's net margin of 0.58%. Nu Skin Enterprises's return on equity of -13.41% beat Sadot Group's return on equity of 5.62%.

Nu Skin Enterprises has a consensus price target of $6.92, signalling upside risk potential of 4.8%. On the other hand Sadot Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 404.91%. Given that Sadot Group has higher upside potential than Nu Skin Enterprises, analysts believe Sadot Group is more attractive than Nu Skin Enterprises.

Nu Skin Enterprises has a beta of 1.200, which suggesting that the stock is 20.046% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sadot Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nu Skin Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.64%. Sadot Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nu Skin Enterprises pays 903.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Sadot Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nu Skin Enterprises quarterly revenues are $430.1M, which are larger than Sadot Group quarterly revenues of $201.7M. Nu Skin Enterprises's net income of $8.3M is higher than Sadot Group's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Nu Skin Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sadot Group's PE ratio is 14.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nu Skin Enterprises is 0.18x versus 0.02x for Sadot Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Foods Holding has a net margin of 1.93% compared to Nu Skin Enterprises's net margin of 1.52%. Nu Skin Enterprises's return on equity of -13.41% beat US Foods Holding's return on equity of 12.04%.

Nu Skin Enterprises has a consensus price target of $6.92, signalling upside risk potential of 4.8%. On the other hand US Foods Holding has an analysts' consensus of $76.70 which suggests that it could grow by 13.31%. Given that US Foods Holding has higher upside potential than Nu Skin Enterprises, analysts believe US Foods Holding is more attractive than Nu Skin Enterprises.

Nu Skin Enterprises has a beta of 1.200, which suggesting that the stock is 20.046% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.676, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.63%.

Nu Skin Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.64%. US Foods Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nu Skin Enterprises pays 903.11% of its earnings as a dividend. US Foods Holding pays out 1.38% of its earnings as a dividend. US Foods Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Nu Skin Enterprises's is not.

Nu Skin Enterprises quarterly revenues are $430.1M, which are smaller than US Foods Holding quarterly revenues of $9.7B. Nu Skin Enterprises's net income of $8.3M is lower than US Foods Holding's net income of $148M. Notably, Nu Skin Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while US Foods Holding's PE ratio is 29.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nu Skin Enterprises is 0.18x versus 0.45x for US Foods Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.