AVO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AMCON Distributing Co. has a net margin of 5.27% compared to Mission Produce, Inc.'s net margin of 0.07%. Mission Produce, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.83% beat AMCON Distributing Co.'s return on equity of 0.49%.

Mission Produce, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.33, signalling upside risk potential of 48.53%. On the other hand AMCON Distributing Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mission Produce, Inc. has higher upside potential than AMCON Distributing Co., analysts believe Mission Produce, Inc. is more attractive than AMCON Distributing Co..

Mission Produce, Inc. has a beta of 0.581, which suggesting that the stock is 41.897% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMCON Distributing Co. has a beta of 0.139, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.129%.

Mission Produce, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AMCON Distributing Co. offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Mission Produce, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AMCON Distributing Co. pays out 78.04% of its earnings as a dividend. AMCON Distributing Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mission Produce, Inc. quarterly revenues are $319M, which are smaller than AMCON Distributing Co. quarterly revenues of $746.3M. Mission Produce, Inc.'s net income of $16.8M is higher than AMCON Distributing Co.'s net income of $491.7K. Notably, Mission Produce, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.02x while AMCON Distributing Co.'s PE ratio is 117.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mission Produce, Inc. is 0.60x versus 0.02x for AMCON Distributing Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sysco Corp. has a net margin of 5.27% compared to Mission Produce, Inc.'s net margin of 2.25%. Mission Produce, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.83% beat Sysco Corp.'s return on equity of 89.11%.

Mission Produce, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.33, signalling upside risk potential of 48.53%. On the other hand Sysco Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $86.88 which suggests that it could grow by 17.04%. Given that Mission Produce, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sysco Corp., analysts believe Mission Produce, Inc. is more attractive than Sysco Corp..

Mission Produce, Inc. has a beta of 0.581, which suggesting that the stock is 41.897% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sysco Corp. has a beta of 0.613, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.731%.

Mission Produce, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sysco Corp. offers a yield of 2.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. Mission Produce, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco Corp. pays out 55.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mission Produce, Inc. quarterly revenues are $319M, which are smaller than Sysco Corp. quarterly revenues of $21.1B. Mission Produce, Inc.'s net income of $16.8M is lower than Sysco Corp.'s net income of $476M. Notably, Mission Produce, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.02x while Sysco Corp.'s PE ratio is 19.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mission Produce, Inc. is 0.60x versus 0.44x for Sysco Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Natural Foods, Inc. has a net margin of 5.27% compared to Mission Produce, Inc.'s net margin of -0.05%. Mission Produce, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.83% beat United Natural Foods, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.21%.

Mission Produce, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.33, signalling upside risk potential of 48.53%. On the other hand United Natural Foods, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $39.13 which suggests that it could grow by 17.11%. Given that Mission Produce, Inc. has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, Inc., analysts believe Mission Produce, Inc. is more attractive than United Natural Foods, Inc..

Mission Produce, Inc. has a beta of 0.581, which suggesting that the stock is 41.897% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Natural Foods, Inc. has a beta of 0.820, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.032%.

Mission Produce, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United Natural Foods, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mission Produce, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United Natural Foods, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mission Produce, Inc. quarterly revenues are $319M, which are smaller than United Natural Foods, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Mission Produce, Inc.'s net income of $16.8M is higher than United Natural Foods, Inc.'s net income of -$4M. Notably, Mission Produce, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.02x while United Natural Foods, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mission Produce, Inc. is 0.60x versus 0.06x for United Natural Foods, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Foods Holding Corp. has a net margin of 5.27% compared to Mission Produce, Inc.'s net margin of 1.5%. Mission Produce, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.83% beat US Foods Holding Corp.'s return on equity of 12.21%.

Mission Produce, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.33, signalling upside risk potential of 48.53%. On the other hand US Foods Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $91.40 which suggests that it could grow by 19.68%. Given that Mission Produce, Inc. has higher upside potential than US Foods Holding Corp., analysts believe Mission Produce, Inc. is more attractive than US Foods Holding Corp..

Mission Produce, Inc. has a beta of 0.581, which suggesting that the stock is 41.897% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Foods Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.032, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.248%.

Mission Produce, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. US Foods Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mission Produce, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Foods Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mission Produce, Inc. quarterly revenues are $319M, which are smaller than US Foods Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $10.2B. Mission Produce, Inc.'s net income of $16.8M is lower than US Foods Holding Corp.'s net income of $153M. Notably, Mission Produce, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.02x while US Foods Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 31.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mission Produce, Inc. is 0.60x versus 0.45x for US Foods Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.