Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Buy
55
NTG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$53.36
Seasonality move
:
3.83%
Day range:
$53.36 - $53.36
52-week range:
$33.56 - $59.45
Dividend yield:
3.8%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
13.3K
1-year change:
55.07%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NTG
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EMO
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NML
Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NTG
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.
|
$53.36 | -- | -- | -- | $0.53 | 3.8% | -- |
|
EMO
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund
|
$45.21 | -- | -- | -- | $0.33 | 7.37% | -- |
|
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,
|
$12.27 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 6.54% | -- |
|
NML
Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund
|
$8.50 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 7.62% | -- |
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
$43.46 | -- | -- | -- | $0.45 | 0% | -- |
|
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
|
$42.46 | -- | -- | -- | $0.37 | 8.86% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NTG
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.
|
-- | 0.801 | -- | -- |
|
EMO
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund
|
-- | 1.047 | -- | -- |
|
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,
|
-- | 1.039 | -- | -- |
|
NML
Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund
|
-- | 0.840 | -- | -- |
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
-- | 1.770 | -- | -- |
|
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
|
-- | 1.017 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NTG
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EMO
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NML
Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NTG or EMO?
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s net margin of --. Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NTGTortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.-- -- -- EMOClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NTG or EMO?
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has higher upside potential than ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund, analysts believe Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. is more attractive than ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NTGTortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.0 0 0 EMOClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund0 0 0 -
Is NTG or EMO More Risky?
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has a beta of 2.754, which suggesting that the stock is 175.399% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund has a beta of 2.446, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 144.64%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTG or EMO?
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.8%. ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund offers a yield of 7.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NTG or EMO?
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund quarterly revenues of --. Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund's net income of --. Notably, Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. is -- versus -- for ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NTGTortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.-- -- -- -- EMOClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NTG or KYN?
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, has a net margin of -- compared to Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s net margin of --. Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NTGTortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.-- -- -- KYNKayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NTG or KYN?
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,, analysts believe Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. is more attractive than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NTGTortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.0 0 0 KYNKayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,0 0 0 -
Is NTG or KYN More Risky?
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has a beta of 2.754, which suggesting that the stock is 175.399% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, has a beta of 1.734, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.374%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTG or KYN?
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.8%. Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, offers a yield of 6.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NTG or KYN?
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, quarterly revenues of --. Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,'s net income of --. Notably, Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. is -- versus -- for Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NTGTortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.-- -- -- -- KYNKayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NTG or NML?
Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s net margin of --. Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NTGTortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.-- -- -- NMLNeuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NTG or NML?
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has higher upside potential than Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund, analysts believe Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. is more attractive than Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NTGTortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.0 0 0 NMLNeuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is NTG or NML More Risky?
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has a beta of 2.754, which suggesting that the stock is 175.399% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund has a beta of 1.883, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.335%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTG or NML?
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.8%. Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund offers a yield of 7.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NTG or NML?
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. is -- versus -- for Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NTGTortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.-- -- -- -- NMLNeuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure & Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NTG or SRV?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s net margin of --. Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NTGTortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.-- -- -- SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NTG or SRV?
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has higher upside potential than NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund, analysts believe Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. is more attractive than NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NTGTortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.0 0 0 SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund0 0 0 -
Is NTG or SRV More Risky?
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has a beta of 2.754, which suggesting that the stock is 175.399% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a beta of 1.538, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.842%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTG or SRV?
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.8%. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NTG or SRV?
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund quarterly revenues of --. Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net income of --. Notably, Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. is -- versus -- for NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NTGTortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.-- -- -- -- SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NTG or TYG?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a net margin of -- compared to Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s net margin of --. Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NTGTortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.-- -- -- TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NTG or TYG?
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure, analysts believe Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. is more attractive than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NTGTortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.0 0 0 TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure0 0 0 -
Is NTG or TYG More Risky?
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has a beta of 2.754, which suggesting that the stock is 175.399% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 2.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.473%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTG or TYG?
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.8%. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure offers a yield of 8.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NTG or TYG?
Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure quarterly revenues of --. Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's net income of --. Notably, Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc. is -- versus -- for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NTGTortoise Midstream Energy Fund, Inc.-- -- -- -- TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
52
TSLL alert for Dec 24
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.
Buy
73
PSIX alert for Dec 24
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.
Sell
31
SOXL alert for Dec 24
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares [SOXL] is up 11.87% over the past day.
