Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Buy
56
SRV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$40.05
Seasonality move
:
-1.57%
Day range:
$40.40 - $41.21
52-week range:
$34.24 - $50.61
Dividend yield:
13.28%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
47.5K
Avg. volume:
72.1K
1-year change:
-11.06%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
$59M
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EMO
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NML
Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
$40.65 | -- | -- | -- | $0.45 | 13.28% | -- |
|
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
|
$47.98 | -- | -- | -- | $1.00 | 8.19% | -- |
|
EMO
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund
|
$45.98 | -- | -- | -- | $0.36 | 9.2% | -- |
|
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund
|
$12.48 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 7.69% | -- |
|
NML
Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund
|
$8.74 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 8.02% | -- |
|
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
|
$43.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.48 | 10.42% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
-- | 1.004 | -- | -- |
|
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
|
-- | 0.377 | -- | -- |
|
EMO
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund
|
-- | 0.430 | -- | -- |
|
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund
|
-- | 0.736 | -- | -- |
|
NML
Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund
|
-- | 0.668 | -- | -- |
|
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
|
-- | 1.040 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EMO
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NML
Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SRV or AMLP?
Alerian MLP ETF has a net margin of -- compared to NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net margin of --. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's return on equity of -- beat Alerian MLP ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- AMLPAlerian MLP ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SRV or AMLP?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Alerian MLP ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has higher upside potential than Alerian MLP ETF, analysts believe NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund is more attractive than Alerian MLP ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund0 0 0 AMLPAlerian MLP ETF0 0 0 -
Is SRV or AMLP More Risky?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.15% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alerian MLP ETF has a beta of 0.607, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.317%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SRV or AMLP?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.28%. Alerian MLP ETF offers a yield of 8.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alerian MLP ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SRV or AMLP?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Alerian MLP ETF quarterly revenues of --. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net income of -- is lower than Alerian MLP ETF's net income of --. Notably, NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Alerian MLP ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund is -- versus -- for Alerian MLP ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- -- AMLPAlerian MLP ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SRV or EMO?
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund has a net margin of -- compared to NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net margin of --. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's return on equity of -- beat ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- EMOClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SRV or EMO?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has higher upside potential than ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund, analysts believe NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund is more attractive than ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund0 0 0 EMOClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund0 0 0 -
Is SRV or EMO More Risky?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.15% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund has a beta of 1.038, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.784%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SRV or EMO?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.28%. ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund offers a yield of 9.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SRV or EMO?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund quarterly revenues of --. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net income of -- is lower than ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund's net income of --. Notably, NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund is -- versus -- for ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- -- EMOClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SRV or KYN?
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund has a net margin of -- compared to NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net margin of --. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's return on equity of -- beat Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- KYNKayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SRV or KYN?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has higher upside potential than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, analysts believe NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund is more attractive than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund0 0 0 KYNKayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund0 0 0 -
Is SRV or KYN More Risky?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.15% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund has a beta of 0.780, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.001%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SRV or KYN?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.28%. Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund offers a yield of 7.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SRV or KYN?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund quarterly revenues of --. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net income of -- is lower than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund's net income of --. Notably, NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund is -- versus -- for Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- -- KYNKayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SRV or NML?
Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net margin of --. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's return on equity of -- beat Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- NMLNeuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SRV or NML?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has higher upside potential than Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund, analysts believe NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund is more attractive than Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund0 0 0 NMLNeuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is SRV or NML More Risky?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.15% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund has a beta of 0.938, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.171%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SRV or NML?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.28%. Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund offers a yield of 8.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SRV or NML?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net income of -- is lower than Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund is -- versus -- for Neuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- -- NMLNeuberger Berman Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SRV or TYG?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a net margin of -- compared to NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net margin of --. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's return on equity of -- beat Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SRV or TYG?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has higher upside potential than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure, analysts believe NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund is more attractive than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund0 0 0 TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure0 0 0 -
Is SRV or TYG More Risky?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.15% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 0.938, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.162%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SRV or TYG?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.28%. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure offers a yield of 10.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SRV or TYG?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure quarterly revenues of --. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net income of -- is lower than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's net income of --. Notably, NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund is -- versus -- for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- -- TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 59.64% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 9.18% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 8
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 5.19% over the past day.
