NRT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Houston American Energy has a net margin of 94.33% compared to North European Oil Royalty Trust's net margin of -111.16%. North European Oil Royalty Trust's return on equity of 536.94% beat Houston American Energy's return on equity of -32.89%.

North European Oil Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Houston American Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that North European Oil Royalty Trust has higher upside potential than Houston American Energy, analysts believe North European Oil Royalty Trust is more attractive than Houston American Energy.

North European Oil Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.756, which suggesting that the stock is 24.358% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Houston American Energy has a beta of 0.461, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.938%.

North European Oil Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.28%. Houston American Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. North European Oil Royalty Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Houston American Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

North European Oil Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are larger than Houston American Energy quarterly revenues of $130.2K. North European Oil Royalty Trust's net income of $2.3M is higher than Houston American Energy's net income of -$144.8K. Notably, North European Oil Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.32x while Houston American Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for North European Oil Royalty Trust is 7.03x versus 21.97x for Houston American Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mexco Energy has a net margin of 94.33% compared to North European Oil Royalty Trust's net margin of 18.13%. North European Oil Royalty Trust's return on equity of 536.94% beat Mexco Energy's return on equity of 6.97%.

North European Oil Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mexco Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that North European Oil Royalty Trust has higher upside potential than Mexco Energy, analysts believe North European Oil Royalty Trust is more attractive than Mexco Energy.

North European Oil Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.756, which suggesting that the stock is 24.358% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mexco Energy has a beta of 0.542, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.786%.

North European Oil Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.28%. Mexco Energy offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. North European Oil Royalty Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy pays out 15.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

North European Oil Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are larger than Mexco Energy quarterly revenues of $1.7M. North European Oil Royalty Trust's net income of $2.3M is higher than Mexco Energy's net income of $317.2K. Notably, North European Oil Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.32x while Mexco Energy's PE ratio is 19.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for North European Oil Royalty Trust is 7.03x versus 3.35x for Mexco Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ring Energy has a net margin of 94.33% compared to North European Oil Royalty Trust's net margin of 37.96%. North European Oil Royalty Trust's return on equity of 536.94% beat Ring Energy's return on equity of 14.15%.

North European Oil Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ring Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 140%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than North European Oil Royalty Trust, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than North European Oil Royalty Trust.

North European Oil Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.756, which suggesting that the stock is 24.358% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ring Energy has a beta of 1.594, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.413%.

North European Oil Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.28%. Ring Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. North European Oil Royalty Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ring Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

North European Oil Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Ring Energy quarterly revenues of $89.2M. North European Oil Royalty Trust's net income of $2.3M is lower than Ring Energy's net income of $33.9M. Notably, North European Oil Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.32x while Ring Energy's PE ratio is 2.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for North European Oil Royalty Trust is 7.03x versus 0.65x for Ring Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riley Exploration Permian has a net margin of 94.33% compared to North European Oil Royalty Trust's net margin of 25.08%. North European Oil Royalty Trust's return on equity of 536.94% beat Riley Exploration Permian's return on equity of 25.88%.

North European Oil Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Riley Exploration Permian has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 68.14%. Given that Riley Exploration Permian has higher upside potential than North European Oil Royalty Trust, analysts believe Riley Exploration Permian is more attractive than North European Oil Royalty Trust.

North European Oil Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.756, which suggesting that the stock is 24.358% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riley Exploration Permian has a beta of 1.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.071%.

North European Oil Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.28%. Riley Exploration Permian offers a yield of 4.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. North European Oil Royalty Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian pays out 24.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

North European Oil Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Riley Exploration Permian quarterly revenues of $102.3M. North European Oil Royalty Trust's net income of $2.3M is lower than Riley Exploration Permian's net income of $25.7M. Notably, North European Oil Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.32x while Riley Exploration Permian's PE ratio is 5.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for North European Oil Royalty Trust is 7.03x versus 1.54x for Riley Exploration Permian. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.