NBHC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 31.57% compared to National Bank Holdings's net margin of 16.32%. National Bank Holdings's return on equity of 10.07% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

National Bank Holdings has a consensus price target of $51.80, signalling upside risk potential of 21%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $50.05 which suggests that it could grow by 15.19%. Given that National Bank Holdings has higher upside potential than Evans Bancorp, analysts believe National Bank Holdings is more attractive than Evans Bancorp.

National Bank Holdings has a beta of 0.861, which suggesting that the stock is 13.914% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.33%.

National Bank Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. National Bank Holdings pays 27.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Bank Holdings quarterly revenues are $104.9M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. National Bank Holdings's net income of $33.1M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, National Bank Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.25x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Bank Holdings is 4.04x versus 2.87x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 31.57% compared to National Bank Holdings's net margin of 27.77%. National Bank Holdings's return on equity of 10.07% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

National Bank Holdings has a consensus price target of $51.80, signalling upside risk potential of 21%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $181.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.53%. Given that National Bank Holdings has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe National Bank Holdings is more attractive than Park National.

National Bank Holdings has a beta of 0.861, which suggesting that the stock is 13.914% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

National Bank Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. Park National offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. National Bank Holdings pays 27.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Bank Holdings quarterly revenues are $104.9M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. National Bank Holdings's net income of $33.1M is lower than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, National Bank Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.25x while Park National's PE ratio is 20.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Bank Holdings is 4.04x versus 5.66x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 31.57% compared to National Bank Holdings's net margin of 24.66%. National Bank Holdings's return on equity of 10.07% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 9.88%.

National Bank Holdings has a consensus price target of $51.80, signalling upside risk potential of 21%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $83.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.87%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than National Bank Holdings, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than National Bank Holdings.

National Bank Holdings has a beta of 0.861, which suggesting that the stock is 13.914% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.735, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.471%.

National Bank Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. National Bank Holdings pays 27.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 363.09% of its earnings as a dividend. National Bank Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Tompkins Financial's is not.

National Bank Holdings quarterly revenues are $104.9M, which are larger than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $75.6M. National Bank Holdings's net income of $33.1M is higher than Tompkins Financial's net income of $18.6M. Notably, National Bank Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.25x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 14.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Bank Holdings is 4.04x versus 3.33x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wesbanco has a net margin of 31.57% compared to National Bank Holdings's net margin of 24.98%. National Bank Holdings's return on equity of 10.07% beat Wesbanco's return on equity of 5.32%.

National Bank Holdings has a consensus price target of $51.80, signalling upside risk potential of 21%. On the other hand Wesbanco has an analysts' consensus of $37.71 which suggests that it could grow by 22.62%. Given that Wesbanco has higher upside potential than National Bank Holdings, analysts believe Wesbanco is more attractive than National Bank Holdings.

National Bank Holdings has a beta of 0.861, which suggesting that the stock is 13.914% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wesbanco has a beta of 0.848, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.204%.

National Bank Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. Wesbanco offers a yield of 4.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. National Bank Holdings pays 27.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Wesbanco pays out 58.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

National Bank Holdings quarterly revenues are $104.9M, which are smaller than Wesbanco quarterly revenues of $149.2M. National Bank Holdings's net income of $33.1M is lower than Wesbanco's net income of $37.3M. Notably, National Bank Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.25x while Wesbanco's PE ratio is 15.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for National Bank Holdings is 4.04x versus 3.33x for Wesbanco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.