Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
55
MNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$13.86
Seasonality move
:
2.26%
Day range:
$13.10 - $13.44
52-week range:
$10.46 - $16.65
Dividend yield:
14.44%
P/E ratio:
14.00x
P/S ratio:
1.55x
P/B ratio:
1.15x
Volume:
372.9K
Avg. volume:
318.3K
1-year change:
-18.05%
Market cap:
$2.3B
Revenue:
$988.5M
EPS (TTM):
$0.96
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MNR
Mach Natural Resources LP
|
$359.5M | $0.27 | 33.5% | -21.26% | $19.00 |
|
AMEN
AMEN Properties, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CCWF
Church & Crawford, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNX
CNX Resources Corp.
|
$430.7M | $0.39 | -18.17% | -0.01% | $36.62 |
|
EQT
EQT Corp.
|
$2.2B | $0.76 | 26.79% | 375.48% | $64.00 |
|
VCYE
Velocity Energy
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MNR
Mach Natural Resources LP
|
$13.44 | $19.00 | $2.3B | 14.00x | $0.27 | 14.44% | 1.55x |
|
AMEN
AMEN Properties, Inc.
|
$475.00 | -- | $24.8M | 26.12x | $7.50 | 7.9% | 10.06x |
|
CCWF
Church & Crawford, Inc.
|
$0.0025 | -- | $2.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CNX
CNX Resources Corp.
|
$40.20 | $36.62 | $5.7B | 10.94x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.01x |
|
EQT
EQT Corp.
|
$58.63 | $64.00 | $36.6B | 17.69x | $0.17 | 1.1% | 4.32x |
|
VCYE
Velocity Energy
|
$0.0001 | -- | $57.2K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MNR
Mach Natural Resources LP
|
37.24% | 0.649 | 52.57% | 0.71x |
|
AMEN
AMEN Properties, Inc.
|
-- | 0.099 | 1.98% | 2.87x |
|
CCWF
Church & Crawford, Inc.
|
-- | 0.833 | -- | -- |
|
CNX
CNX Resources Corp.
|
37.52% | 0.076 | 49.68% | 0.25x |
|
EQT
EQT Corp.
|
24.72% | 0.328 | 21.05% | 0.63x |
|
VCYE
Velocity Energy
|
-- | -1.309 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MNR
Mach Natural Resources LP
|
$69.5M | $46.5M | 4.88% | 7.45% | 18.76% | -$491.4M |
|
AMEN
AMEN Properties, Inc.
|
$142K | -$116.4K | 18.03% | 18.03% | -21.31% | $234.8K |
|
CCWF
Church & Crawford, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNX
CNX Resources Corp.
|
$253.5M | $197M | 9.42% | 15.51% | 36.59% | $122.6M |
|
EQT
EQT Corp.
|
$1B | $935.3M | 6.84% | 9.09% | 41.13% | $521.3M |
|
VCYE
Velocity Energy
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Mach Natural Resources LP vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MNR or AMEN?
AMEN Properties, Inc. has a net margin of -14.39% compared to Mach Natural Resources LP's net margin of 49.95%. Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 7.45% beat AMEN Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.03%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MNRMach Natural Resources LP28.06% -$0.28 $3.1B AMENAMEN Properties, Inc.25.99% $5.13 $4.8M -
What do Analysts Say About MNR or AMEN?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.37%. On the other hand AMEN Properties, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mach Natural Resources LP has higher upside potential than AMEN Properties, Inc., analysts believe Mach Natural Resources LP is more attractive than AMEN Properties, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MNRMach Natural Resources LP6 1 0 AMENAMEN Properties, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is MNR or AMEN More Risky?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMEN Properties, Inc. has a beta of 0.325, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.51%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MNR or AMEN?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.44%. AMEN Properties, Inc. offers a yield of 7.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $7.50 per share. Mach Natural Resources LP pays 168.83% of its earnings as a dividend. AMEN Properties, Inc. pays out 99.34% of its earnings as a dividend. AMEN Properties, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Mach Natural Resources LP's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MNR or AMEN?
Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues are $247.8M, which are larger than AMEN Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues of $546.3K. Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of -$35.7M is lower than AMEN Properties, Inc.'s net income of $272.9K. Notably, Mach Natural Resources LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.00x while AMEN Properties, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mach Natural Resources LP is 1.55x versus 10.06x for AMEN Properties, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MNRMach Natural Resources LP1.55x 14.00x $247.8M -$35.7M AMENAMEN Properties, Inc.10.06x 26.12x $546.3K $272.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns MNR or CCWF?
Church & Crawford, Inc. has a net margin of -14.39% compared to Mach Natural Resources LP's net margin of --. Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 7.45% beat Church & Crawford, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MNRMach Natural Resources LP28.06% -$0.28 $3.1B CCWFChurch & Crawford, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MNR or CCWF?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.37%. On the other hand Church & Crawford, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mach Natural Resources LP has higher upside potential than Church & Crawford, Inc., analysts believe Mach Natural Resources LP is more attractive than Church & Crawford, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MNRMach Natural Resources LP6 1 0 CCWFChurch & Crawford, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is MNR or CCWF More Risky?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Church & Crawford, Inc. has a beta of 0.557, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.29%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MNR or CCWF?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.44%. Church & Crawford, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mach Natural Resources LP pays 168.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Church & Crawford, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MNR or CCWF?
Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues are $247.8M, which are larger than Church & Crawford, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of -$35.7M is higher than Church & Crawford, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Mach Natural Resources LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.00x while Church & Crawford, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mach Natural Resources LP is 1.55x versus -- for Church & Crawford, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MNRMach Natural Resources LP1.55x 14.00x $247.8M -$35.7M CCWFChurch & Crawford, Inc.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MNR or CNX?
CNX Resources Corp. has a net margin of -14.39% compared to Mach Natural Resources LP's net margin of 36.45%. Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 7.45% beat CNX Resources Corp.'s return on equity of 15.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MNRMach Natural Resources LP28.06% -$0.28 $3.1B CNXCNX Resources Corp.47.09% $1.27 $6.9B -
What do Analysts Say About MNR or CNX?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.37%. On the other hand CNX Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $36.62 which suggests that it could fall by -8.92%. Given that Mach Natural Resources LP has higher upside potential than CNX Resources Corp., analysts believe Mach Natural Resources LP is more attractive than CNX Resources Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MNRMach Natural Resources LP6 1 0 CNXCNX Resources Corp.1 8 2 -
Is MNR or CNX More Risky?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNX Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.661, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.876%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MNR or CNX?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.44%. CNX Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mach Natural Resources LP pays 168.83% of its earnings as a dividend. CNX Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MNR or CNX?
Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues are $247.8M, which are smaller than CNX Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of $538.4M. Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of -$35.7M is lower than CNX Resources Corp.'s net income of $196.3M. Notably, Mach Natural Resources LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.00x while CNX Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mach Natural Resources LP is 1.55x versus 3.01x for CNX Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MNRMach Natural Resources LP1.55x 14.00x $247.8M -$35.7M CNXCNX Resources Corp.3.01x 10.94x $538.4M $196.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns MNR or EQT?
EQT Corp. has a net margin of -14.39% compared to Mach Natural Resources LP's net margin of 32.82%. Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 7.45% beat EQT Corp.'s return on equity of 9.09%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MNRMach Natural Resources LP28.06% -$0.28 $3.1B EQTEQT Corp.45.89% $1.08 $35.2B -
What do Analysts Say About MNR or EQT?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.37%. On the other hand EQT Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $64.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.16%. Given that Mach Natural Resources LP has higher upside potential than EQT Corp., analysts believe Mach Natural Resources LP is more attractive than EQT Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MNRMach Natural Resources LP6 1 0 EQTEQT Corp.17 7 0 -
Is MNR or EQT More Risky?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EQT Corp. has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.169%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MNR or EQT?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.44%. EQT Corp. offers a yield of 1.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Mach Natural Resources LP pays 168.83% of its earnings as a dividend. EQT Corp. pays out 19.26% of its earnings as a dividend. EQT Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Mach Natural Resources LP's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MNR or EQT?
Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues are $247.8M, which are smaller than EQT Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of -$35.7M is lower than EQT Corp.'s net income of $746.4M. Notably, Mach Natural Resources LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.00x while EQT Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mach Natural Resources LP is 1.55x versus 4.32x for EQT Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MNRMach Natural Resources LP1.55x 14.00x $247.8M -$35.7M EQTEQT Corp.4.32x 17.69x $2.3B $746.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns MNR or VCYE?
Velocity Energy has a net margin of -14.39% compared to Mach Natural Resources LP's net margin of --. Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 7.45% beat Velocity Energy's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MNRMach Natural Resources LP28.06% -$0.28 $3.1B VCYEVelocity Energy-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MNR or VCYE?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 41.37%. On the other hand Velocity Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mach Natural Resources LP has higher upside potential than Velocity Energy, analysts believe Mach Natural Resources LP is more attractive than Velocity Energy.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MNRMach Natural Resources LP6 1 0 VCYEVelocity Energy0 0 0 -
Is MNR or VCYE More Risky?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Velocity Energy has a beta of -39.796, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4079.641%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MNR or VCYE?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.44%. Velocity Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mach Natural Resources LP pays 168.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Velocity Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MNR or VCYE?
Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues are $247.8M, which are larger than Velocity Energy quarterly revenues of --. Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of -$35.7M is higher than Velocity Energy's net income of --. Notably, Mach Natural Resources LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.00x while Velocity Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mach Natural Resources LP is 1.55x versus -- for Velocity Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MNRMach Natural Resources LP1.55x 14.00x $247.8M -$35.7M VCYEVelocity Energy-- -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Sell
49
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
44
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
73
HYMC alert for Feb 19
Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. [HYMC] is up 3.52% over the past day.
Buy
57
GLBE alert for Feb 19
Global-e Online Ltd. [GLBE] is up 3.59% over the past day.
Sell
37
ACLS alert for Feb 19
Axcelis Technologies, Inc. [ACLS] is down 2.51% over the past day.
