CCWF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CNX Resources Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Church & Crawford, Inc.'s net margin of 36.45%. Church & Crawford, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat CNX Resources Corp.'s return on equity of 15.51%.

Church & Crawford, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CNX Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $36.62 which suggests that it could fall by -8.92%. Given that CNX Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Church & Crawford, Inc., analysts believe CNX Resources Corp. is more attractive than Church & Crawford, Inc..

Church & Crawford, Inc. has a beta of 0.557, which suggesting that the stock is 44.29% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNX Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.661, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.876%.

Church & Crawford, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CNX Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Church & Crawford, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CNX Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Church & Crawford, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CNX Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of $538.4M. Church & Crawford, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than CNX Resources Corp.'s net income of $196.3M. Notably, Church & Crawford, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CNX Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Church & Crawford, Inc. is -- versus 3.01x for CNX Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EQT Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Church & Crawford, Inc.'s net margin of 32.82%. Church & Crawford, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat EQT Corp.'s return on equity of 9.09%.

Church & Crawford, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EQT Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $64.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.16%. Given that EQT Corp. has higher upside potential than Church & Crawford, Inc., analysts believe EQT Corp. is more attractive than Church & Crawford, Inc..

Church & Crawford, Inc. has a beta of 0.557, which suggesting that the stock is 44.29% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EQT Corp. has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.169%.

Church & Crawford, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EQT Corp. offers a yield of 1.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Church & Crawford, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EQT Corp. pays out 19.26% of its earnings as a dividend. EQT Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Church & Crawford, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than EQT Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Church & Crawford, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than EQT Corp.'s net income of $746.4M. Notably, Church & Crawford, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EQT Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Church & Crawford, Inc. is -- versus 4.32x for EQT Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Velocity Energy has a net margin of -- compared to Church & Crawford, Inc.'s net margin of --. Church & Crawford, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Velocity Energy's return on equity of --.

Church & Crawford, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Velocity Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Church & Crawford, Inc. has higher upside potential than Velocity Energy, analysts believe Church & Crawford, Inc. is more attractive than Velocity Energy.

Church & Crawford, Inc. has a beta of 0.557, which suggesting that the stock is 44.29% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Velocity Energy has a beta of -39.796, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4079.641%.

Church & Crawford, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Velocity Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Church & Crawford, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Velocity Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Church & Crawford, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Velocity Energy quarterly revenues of --. Church & Crawford, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Velocity Energy's net income of --. Notably, Church & Crawford, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Velocity Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Church & Crawford, Inc. is -- versus -- for Velocity Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.