MGA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Taiga Motors has a net margin of 4.71% compared to Magna International's net margin of -283.27%. Magna International's return on equity of 8.88% beat Taiga Motors's return on equity of -351%.

Magna International has a consensus price target of $50.03, signalling upside risk potential of 19.55%. On the other hand Taiga Motors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Magna International has higher upside potential than Taiga Motors, analysts believe Magna International is more attractive than Taiga Motors.

Magna International has a beta of 1.616, which suggesting that the stock is 61.57% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taiga Motors has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Magna International has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.54%. Taiga Motors offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Magna International pays 43.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Taiga Motors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magna International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Magna International quarterly revenues are $10.3B, which are larger than Taiga Motors quarterly revenues of $3.8M. Magna International's net income of $484M is higher than Taiga Motors's net income of -$10.7M. Notably, Magna International's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.19x while Taiga Motors's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Magna International is 0.28x versus 0.49x for Taiga Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gentherm has a net margin of 4.71% compared to Magna International's net margin of 4.3%. Magna International's return on equity of 8.88% beat Gentherm's return on equity of 10.41%.

Magna International has a consensus price target of $50.03, signalling upside risk potential of 19.55%. On the other hand Gentherm has an analysts' consensus of $69.20 which suggests that it could grow by 53.42%. Given that Gentherm has higher upside potential than Magna International, analysts believe Gentherm is more attractive than Magna International.

Magna International has a beta of 1.616, which suggesting that the stock is 61.57% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gentherm has a beta of 1.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.103%.

Magna International has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.54%. Gentherm offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Magna International pays 43.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Gentherm pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magna International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Magna International quarterly revenues are $10.3B, which are larger than Gentherm quarterly revenues of $371.5M. Magna International's net income of $484M is higher than Gentherm's net income of $16M. Notably, Magna International's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.19x while Gentherm's PE ratio is 18.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Magna International is 0.28x versus 0.86x for Gentherm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 4.71% compared to Magna International's net margin of 8.61%. Magna International's return on equity of 8.88% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Magna International has a consensus price target of $50.03, signalling upside risk potential of 19.55%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $293.33 which suggests that it could fall by -28.64%. Given that Magna International has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Magna International is more attractive than Tesla.

Magna International has a beta of 1.616, which suggesting that the stock is 61.57% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.301, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.123%.

Magna International has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.54%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Magna International pays 43.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magna International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Magna International quarterly revenues are $10.3B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Magna International's net income of $484M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Magna International's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.19x while Tesla's PE ratio is 112.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Magna International is 0.28x versus 14.77x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vision Marine Technologies has a net margin of 4.71% compared to Magna International's net margin of -358.39%. Magna International's return on equity of 8.88% beat Vision Marine Technologies's return on equity of -181.67%.

Magna International has a consensus price target of $50.03, signalling upside risk potential of 19.55%. On the other hand Vision Marine Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $234.56 which suggests that it could grow by 17010.83%. Given that Vision Marine Technologies has higher upside potential than Magna International, analysts believe Vision Marine Technologies is more attractive than Magna International.

Magna International has a beta of 1.616, which suggesting that the stock is 61.57% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vision Marine Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Magna International has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.54%. Vision Marine Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Magna International pays 43.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Vision Marine Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magna International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Magna International quarterly revenues are $10.3B, which are larger than Vision Marine Technologies quarterly revenues of $743.9K. Magna International's net income of $484M is higher than Vision Marine Technologies's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Magna International's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.19x while Vision Marine Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Magna International is 0.28x versus 0.06x for Vision Marine Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.