MEG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DLH Holdings has a net margin of -14.93% compared to Montrose Environmental Group's net margin of 1.23%. Montrose Environmental Group's return on equity of -15.66% beat DLH Holdings's return on equity of 5.87%.

Montrose Environmental Group has a consensus price target of $31.00, signalling upside risk potential of 161.6%. On the other hand DLH Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 332.9%. Given that DLH Holdings has higher upside potential than Montrose Environmental Group, analysts believe DLH Holdings is more attractive than Montrose Environmental Group.

Montrose Environmental Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DLH Holdings has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.471%.

Montrose Environmental Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DLH Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Montrose Environmental Group pays -17.76% of its earnings as a dividend. DLH Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Montrose Environmental Group quarterly revenues are $189.1M, which are larger than DLH Holdings quarterly revenues of $90.8M. Montrose Environmental Group's net income of -$28.2M is lower than DLH Holdings's net income of $1.1M. Notably, Montrose Environmental Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DLH Holdings's PE ratio is 7.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Montrose Environmental Group is 0.56x versus 0.13x for DLH Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FTI Consulting has a net margin of -14.93% compared to Montrose Environmental Group's net margin of 5.56%. Montrose Environmental Group's return on equity of -15.66% beat FTI Consulting's return on equity of 13.09%.

Montrose Environmental Group has a consensus price target of $31.00, signalling upside risk potential of 161.6%. On the other hand FTI Consulting has an analysts' consensus of $173.50 which suggests that it could grow by 9.85%. Given that Montrose Environmental Group has higher upside potential than FTI Consulting, analysts believe Montrose Environmental Group is more attractive than FTI Consulting.

Montrose Environmental Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.215, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.536%.

Montrose Environmental Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FTI Consulting offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Montrose Environmental Group pays -17.76% of its earnings as a dividend. FTI Consulting pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Montrose Environmental Group quarterly revenues are $189.1M, which are smaller than FTI Consulting quarterly revenues of $894.9M. Montrose Environmental Group's net income of -$28.2M is lower than FTI Consulting's net income of $49.7M. Notably, Montrose Environmental Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FTI Consulting's PE ratio is 20.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Montrose Environmental Group is 0.56x versus 1.53x for FTI Consulting. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huron Consulting Group has a net margin of -14.93% compared to Montrose Environmental Group's net margin of 8.51%. Montrose Environmental Group's return on equity of -15.66% beat Huron Consulting Group's return on equity of 22.32%.

Montrose Environmental Group has a consensus price target of $31.00, signalling upside risk potential of 161.6%. On the other hand Huron Consulting Group has an analysts' consensus of $169.25 which suggests that it could grow by 22.86%. Given that Montrose Environmental Group has higher upside potential than Huron Consulting Group, analysts believe Montrose Environmental Group is more attractive than Huron Consulting Group.

Montrose Environmental Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huron Consulting Group has a beta of 0.372, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.804%.

Montrose Environmental Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Huron Consulting Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Montrose Environmental Group pays -17.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Huron Consulting Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Montrose Environmental Group quarterly revenues are $189.1M, which are smaller than Huron Consulting Group quarterly revenues of $399.3M. Montrose Environmental Group's net income of -$28.2M is lower than Huron Consulting Group's net income of $34M. Notably, Montrose Environmental Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Huron Consulting Group's PE ratio is 21.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Montrose Environmental Group is 0.56x versus 1.68x for Huron Consulting Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICF International has a net margin of -14.93% compared to Montrose Environmental Group's net margin of 4.95%. Montrose Environmental Group's return on equity of -15.66% beat ICF International's return on equity of 11.63%.

Montrose Environmental Group has a consensus price target of $31.00, signalling upside risk potential of 161.6%. On the other hand ICF International has an analysts' consensus of $108.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.43%. Given that Montrose Environmental Group has higher upside potential than ICF International, analysts believe Montrose Environmental Group is more attractive than ICF International.

Montrose Environmental Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICF International has a beta of 0.488, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.17%.

Montrose Environmental Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ICF International offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Montrose Environmental Group pays -17.76% of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International pays out 9.54% of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Montrose Environmental Group quarterly revenues are $189.1M, which are smaller than ICF International quarterly revenues of $496.3M. Montrose Environmental Group's net income of -$28.2M is lower than ICF International's net income of $24.6M. Notably, Montrose Environmental Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ICF International's PE ratio is 14.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Montrose Environmental Group is 0.56x versus 0.79x for ICF International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.