MCB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 17.15% compared to Metropolitan Bank Holding's net margin of 16.32%. Metropolitan Bank Holding's return on equity of 8.86% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a consensus price target of $78.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.09%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $50.05 which suggests that it could grow by 15.19%. Given that Metropolitan Bank Holding has higher upside potential than Evans Bancorp, analysts believe Metropolitan Bank Holding is more attractive than Evans Bancorp.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a beta of 1.175, which suggesting that the stock is 17.49% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.33%.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Metropolitan Bank Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Metropolitan Bank Holding quarterly revenues are $71.5M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Metropolitan Bank Holding's net income of $12.3M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Metropolitan Bank Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.18x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metropolitan Bank Holding is 2.47x versus 2.87x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 17.15% compared to Metropolitan Bank Holding's net margin of 27.77%. Metropolitan Bank Holding's return on equity of 8.86% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a consensus price target of $78.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.09%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $181.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.53%. Given that Metropolitan Bank Holding has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Metropolitan Bank Holding is more attractive than Park National.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a beta of 1.175, which suggesting that the stock is 17.49% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park National offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. Metropolitan Bank Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Metropolitan Bank Holding quarterly revenues are $71.5M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. Metropolitan Bank Holding's net income of $12.3M is lower than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, Metropolitan Bank Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.18x while Park National's PE ratio is 20.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metropolitan Bank Holding is 2.47x versus 5.66x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 17.15% compared to Metropolitan Bank Holding's net margin of 24.66%. Metropolitan Bank Holding's return on equity of 8.86% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 9.88%.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a consensus price target of $78.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.09%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $83.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.87%. Given that Metropolitan Bank Holding has higher upside potential than Tompkins Financial, analysts believe Metropolitan Bank Holding is more attractive than Tompkins Financial.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a beta of 1.175, which suggesting that the stock is 17.49% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.735, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.471%.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Metropolitan Bank Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 363.09% of its earnings as a dividend.

Metropolitan Bank Holding quarterly revenues are $71.5M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $75.6M. Metropolitan Bank Holding's net income of $12.3M is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $18.6M. Notably, Metropolitan Bank Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.18x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 14.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metropolitan Bank Holding is 2.47x versus 3.33x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unity Bancorp has a net margin of 17.15% compared to Metropolitan Bank Holding's net margin of 39.75%. Metropolitan Bank Holding's return on equity of 8.86% beat Unity Bancorp's return on equity of 14.84%.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a consensus price target of $78.00, signalling upside risk potential of 31.09%. On the other hand Unity Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $48.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.05%. Given that Metropolitan Bank Holding has higher upside potential than Unity Bancorp, analysts believe Metropolitan Bank Holding is more attractive than Unity Bancorp.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a beta of 1.175, which suggesting that the stock is 17.49% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unity Bancorp has a beta of 1.032, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.195%.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Unity Bancorp offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Metropolitan Bank Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Unity Bancorp pays out 11.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Unity Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Metropolitan Bank Holding quarterly revenues are $71.5M, which are larger than Unity Bancorp quarterly revenues of $27.4M. Metropolitan Bank Holding's net income of $12.3M is higher than Unity Bancorp's net income of $10.9M. Notably, Metropolitan Bank Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.18x while Unity Bancorp's PE ratio is 10.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metropolitan Bank Holding is 2.47x versus 4.17x for Unity Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.