LOAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of 8.36% compared to Loar Holdings's net margin of 7.97%. Loar Holdings's return on equity of 3.04% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 16.9%.

Loar Holdings has a consensus price target of $97.50, signalling upside risk potential of 29.38%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $321.05 which suggests that it could grow by 20.74%. Given that Loar Holdings has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe Loar Holdings is more attractive than General Dynamics.

Loar Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.595, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.532%.

Loar Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Loar Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 43.08% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Loar Holdings quarterly revenues are $103.5M, which are smaller than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $11.7B. Loar Holdings's net income of $8.7M is lower than General Dynamics's net income of $930M. Notably, Loar Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 380.39x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 20.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loar Holdings is 17.22x versus 1.59x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 8.36% compared to Loar Holdings's net margin of 18.82%. Loar Holdings's return on equity of 3.04% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 24.49%.

Loar Holdings has a consensus price target of $97.50, signalling upside risk potential of 29.38%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $210.71 which suggests that it could grow by 22.87%. Given that Loar Holdings has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe Loar Holdings is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

Loar Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.637%.

Loar Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Loar Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 6.21% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Loar Holdings quarterly revenues are $103.5M, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $9.8B. Loar Holdings's net income of $8.7M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Loar Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 380.39x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 30.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loar Holdings is 17.22x versus 2.47x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heico has a net margin of 8.36% compared to Loar Holdings's net margin of 13.78%. Loar Holdings's return on equity of 3.04% beat Heico's return on equity of 14.04%.

Loar Holdings has a consensus price target of $97.50, signalling upside risk potential of 29.38%. On the other hand Heico has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.41%. Given that Loar Holdings has higher upside potential than Heico, analysts believe Loar Holdings is more attractive than Heico.

Loar Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heico has a beta of 1.185, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.482%.

Loar Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Heico offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Loar Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Heico pays out 5.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Heico's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Loar Holdings quarterly revenues are $103.5M, which are smaller than Heico quarterly revenues of $1B. Loar Holdings's net income of $8.7M is lower than Heico's net income of $139.7M. Notably, Loar Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 380.39x while Heico's PE ratio is 51.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loar Holdings is 17.22x versus 6.83x for Heico. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Triumph Group has a net margin of 8.36% compared to Loar Holdings's net margin of 4.13%. Loar Holdings's return on equity of 3.04% beat Triumph Group's return on equity of --.

Loar Holdings has a consensus price target of $97.50, signalling upside risk potential of 29.38%. On the other hand Triumph Group has an analysts' consensus of $18.70 which suggests that it could grow by 0.6%. Given that Loar Holdings has higher upside potential than Triumph Group, analysts believe Loar Holdings is more attractive than Triumph Group.

Loar Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Triumph Group has a beta of 2.519, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.922%.

Loar Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Triumph Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Loar Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Triumph Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Loar Holdings quarterly revenues are $103.5M, which are smaller than Triumph Group quarterly revenues of $287.5M. Loar Holdings's net income of $8.7M is lower than Triumph Group's net income of $11.9M. Notably, Loar Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 380.39x while Triumph Group's PE ratio is 2.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loar Holdings is 17.22x versus 1.18x for Triumph Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.