LOAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Airspan Networks has a net margin of 21.78% compared to Loar Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Loar Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.03% beat Airspan Networks's return on equity of --.

Loar Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $95.36, signalling upside risk potential of 40.6%. On the other hand Airspan Networks has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Loar Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Airspan Networks, analysts believe Loar Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Airspan Networks.

Loar Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Airspan Networks has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Loar Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Airspan Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Loar Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Airspan Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Loar Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $126.8M, which are larger than Airspan Networks quarterly revenues of --. Loar Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $27.6M is higher than Airspan Networks's net income of --. Notably, Loar Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 102.59x while Airspan Networks's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loar Holdings, Inc. is 13.61x versus -- for Airspan Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Dynamics Corp. has a net margin of 21.78% compared to Loar Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 8.21%. Loar Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.03% beat General Dynamics Corp.'s return on equity of 18.28%.

Loar Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $95.36, signalling upside risk potential of 40.6%. On the other hand General Dynamics Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $380.80 which suggests that it could grow by 11.44%. Given that Loar Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than General Dynamics Corp., analysts believe Loar Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than General Dynamics Corp..

Loar Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics Corp. has a beta of 0.399, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.128%.

Loar Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Dynamics Corp. offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Loar Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics Corp. pays out 41.67% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Loar Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $126.8M, which are smaller than General Dynamics Corp. quarterly revenues of $12.9B. Loar Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $27.6M is lower than General Dynamics Corp.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, Loar Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 102.59x while General Dynamics Corp.'s PE ratio is 22.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loar Holdings, Inc. is 13.61x versus 1.81x for General Dynamics Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 21.78% compared to Loar Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 17.82%. Loar Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.03% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 41.61%.

Loar Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $95.36, signalling upside risk potential of 40.6%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $339.69 which suggests that it could grow by 16.39%. Given that Loar Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe Loar Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

Loar Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.993%.

Loar Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Loar Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 18.74% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Loar Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $126.8M, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $12.2B. Loar Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $27.6M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Loar Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 102.59x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 38.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loar Holdings, Inc. is 13.61x versus 7.14x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HEICO Corp. has a net margin of 21.78% compared to Loar Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 16.62%. Loar Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.03% beat HEICO Corp.'s return on equity of 16.25%.

Loar Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $95.36, signalling upside risk potential of 40.6%. On the other hand HEICO Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $280.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.39%. Given that Loar Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than HEICO Corp., analysts believe Loar Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than HEICO Corp..

Loar Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HEICO Corp. has a beta of 1.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.132%.

Loar Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HEICO Corp. offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Loar Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HEICO Corp. pays out 5.73% of its earnings as a dividend. HEICO Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Loar Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $126.8M, which are smaller than HEICO Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Loar Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $27.6M is lower than HEICO Corp.'s net income of $190.7M. Notably, Loar Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 102.59x while HEICO Corp.'s PE ratio is 54.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Loar Holdings, Inc. is 13.61x versus 8.10x for HEICO Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.