KRO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of -3.12% compared to Kronos Worldwide's net margin of 7.16%. Kronos Worldwide's return on equity of 10.72% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03%.

Kronos Worldwide has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.14%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $23.33 which suggests that it could grow by 42.45%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Kronos Worldwide, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Kronos Worldwide.

Kronos Worldwide has a beta of 1.226, which suggesting that the stock is 22.579% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.697, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 169.68%.

Kronos Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.6%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kronos Worldwide pays 64.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kronos Worldwide quarterly revenues are $423.1M, which are smaller than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $630.9M. Kronos Worldwide's net income of -$13.2M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M. Notably, Kronos Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.00x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 5.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kronos Worldwide is 0.45x versus 0.71x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of -3.12% compared to Kronos Worldwide's net margin of -10.34%. Kronos Worldwide's return on equity of 10.72% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -10.21%.

Kronos Worldwide has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.14%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $10.91 which suggests that it could grow by 25.85%. Given that Kronos Worldwide has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Kronos Worldwide is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Kronos Worldwide has a beta of 1.226, which suggesting that the stock is 22.579% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.452%.

Kronos Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.6%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kronos Worldwide pays 64.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kronos Worldwide quarterly revenues are $423.1M, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Kronos Worldwide's net income of -$13.2M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$447M. Notably, Kronos Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.00x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kronos Worldwide is 0.45x versus 0.22x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -3.12% compared to Kronos Worldwide's net margin of --. Kronos Worldwide's return on equity of 10.72% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Kronos Worldwide has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.14%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 203.03%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Kronos Worldwide, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Kronos Worldwide.

Kronos Worldwide has a beta of 1.226, which suggesting that the stock is 22.579% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.74%.

Kronos Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.6%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kronos Worldwide pays 64.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kronos Worldwide quarterly revenues are $423.1M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Kronos Worldwide's net income of -$13.2M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, Kronos Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.00x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kronos Worldwide is 0.45x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -3.12% compared to Kronos Worldwide's net margin of --. Kronos Worldwide's return on equity of 10.72% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Kronos Worldwide has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.14%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 140.77%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Kronos Worldwide, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Kronos Worldwide.

Kronos Worldwide has a beta of 1.226, which suggesting that the stock is 22.579% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.498, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.16%.

Kronos Worldwide has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.6%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kronos Worldwide pays 64.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kronos Worldwide quarterly revenues are $423.1M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Kronos Worldwide's net income of -$13.2M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Kronos Worldwide's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.00x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kronos Worldwide is 0.45x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.