KRO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -8.1% compared to Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s net margin of 1.45%. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.96% beat Friedman Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53%.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.85%. On the other hand Friedman Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, Inc., analysts believe Kronos Worldwide, Inc. is more attractive than Friedman Industries, Inc..

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.841% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.552, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.197%.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.23%. Friedman Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Kronos Worldwide, Inc. pays 64.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries, Inc. pays out 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. quarterly revenues are $456.9M, which are larger than Friedman Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $152.4M. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s net income of -$37M is lower than Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M. Notably, Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.50x while Friedman Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kronos Worldwide, Inc. is 0.29x versus 0.27x for Friedman Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Green Plains, Inc. has a net margin of -8.1% compared to Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s net margin of 2.11%. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.96% beat Green Plains, Inc.'s return on equity of -22.8%.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.85%. On the other hand Green Plains, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.67 which suggests that it could grow by 18.64%. Given that Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has higher upside potential than Green Plains, Inc., analysts believe Kronos Worldwide, Inc. is more attractive than Green Plains, Inc..

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.841% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Plains, Inc. has a beta of 1.404, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.389%.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.23%. Green Plains, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kronos Worldwide, Inc. pays 64.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Green Plains, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. quarterly revenues are $456.9M, which are smaller than Green Plains, Inc. quarterly revenues of $519.7M. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s net income of -$37M is lower than Green Plains, Inc.'s net income of $11M. Notably, Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.50x while Green Plains, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kronos Worldwide, Inc. is 0.29x versus 0.29x for Green Plains, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of -8.1% compared to Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s net margin of --. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.96% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.85%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 46.55%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has higher upside potential than Kronos Worldwide, Inc., analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. is more attractive than Kronos Worldwide, Inc..

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.841% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.91%.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.23%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kronos Worldwide, Inc. pays 64.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. quarterly revenues are $456.9M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s net income of -$37M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.50x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kronos Worldwide, Inc. is 0.29x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of -8.1% compared to Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s net margin of --. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.96% beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 26.85%. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 134.38%. Given that Solitario Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Kronos Worldwide, Inc., analysts believe Solitario Resources Corp. is more attractive than Kronos Worldwide, Inc..

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.841% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.966%.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.23%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kronos Worldwide, Inc. pays 64.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. quarterly revenues are $456.9M, which are larger than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s net income of -$37M is lower than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.50x while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kronos Worldwide, Inc. is 0.29x versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.