KRO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Green Plains, Inc. has a net margin of -8.1% compared to Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s net margin of 2.11%. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.96% beat Green Plains, Inc.'s return on equity of -22.8%.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 19.83%. On the other hand Green Plains, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.56 which suggests that it could grow by 16.96%. Given that Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has higher upside potential than Green Plains, Inc., analysts believe Kronos Worldwide, Inc. is more attractive than Green Plains, Inc..

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.841% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Plains, Inc. has a beta of 1.404, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.389%.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. Green Plains, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kronos Worldwide, Inc. pays 64.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Green Plains, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. quarterly revenues are $456.9M, which are smaller than Green Plains, Inc. quarterly revenues of $519.7M. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s net income of -$37M is lower than Green Plains, Inc.'s net income of $11M. Notably, Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.50x while Green Plains, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kronos Worldwide, Inc. is 0.28x versus 0.30x for Green Plains, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Origin Materials, Inc. has a net margin of -8.1% compared to Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s net margin of -351.77%. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.96% beat Origin Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of -21.35%.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 19.83%. On the other hand Origin Materials, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $0.50 which suggests that it could grow by 141.9%. Given that Origin Materials, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kronos Worldwide, Inc., analysts believe Origin Materials, Inc. is more attractive than Kronos Worldwide, Inc..

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.841% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Origin Materials, Inc. has a beta of 0.928, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.206%.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. Origin Materials, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kronos Worldwide, Inc. pays 64.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Origin Materials, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. quarterly revenues are $456.9M, which are larger than Origin Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.7M. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s net income of -$37M is lower than Origin Materials, Inc.'s net income of -$16.4M. Notably, Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.50x while Origin Materials, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kronos Worldwide, Inc. is 0.28x versus 1.21x for Origin Materials, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of -8.1% compared to Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s net margin of --. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.96% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 19.83%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 37.1%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has higher upside potential than Kronos Worldwide, Inc., analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. is more attractive than Kronos Worldwide, Inc..

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.841% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.91%.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kronos Worldwide, Inc. pays 64.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. quarterly revenues are $456.9M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s net income of -$37M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.50x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kronos Worldwide, Inc. is 0.28x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of -8.1% compared to Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s net margin of --. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.96% beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a consensus price target of $5.50, signalling upside risk potential of 19.83%. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 117.08%. Given that Solitario Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Kronos Worldwide, Inc., analysts believe Solitario Resources Corp. is more attractive than Kronos Worldwide, Inc..

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a beta of 1.148, which suggesting that the stock is 14.841% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.966%.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kronos Worldwide, Inc. pays 64.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kronos Worldwide, Inc. quarterly revenues are $456.9M, which are larger than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s net income of -$37M is lower than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Kronos Worldwide, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.50x while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kronos Worldwide, Inc. is 0.28x versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.