KLG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bunge Global SA has a net margin of 1.31% compared to WK Kellogg Co.'s net margin of 0.83%. WK Kellogg Co.'s return on equity of 9.99% beat Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 11.03%.

WK Kellogg Co. has a consensus price target of $23.19, signalling upside risk potential of 0.81%. On the other hand Bunge Global SA has an analysts' consensus of $105.67 which suggests that it could grow by 11.95%. Given that Bunge Global SA has higher upside potential than WK Kellogg Co., analysts believe Bunge Global SA is more attractive than WK Kellogg Co..

WK Kellogg Co. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.786, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.396%.

WK Kellogg Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Bunge Global SA offers a yield of 2.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. WK Kellogg Co. pays 77.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Bunge Global SA pays out 34.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WK Kellogg Co. quarterly revenues are $613M, which are smaller than Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues of $22.2B. WK Kellogg Co.'s net income of $8M is lower than Bunge Global SA's net income of $184M. Notably, WK Kellogg Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 62.57x while Bunge Global SA's PE ratio is 10.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WK Kellogg Co. is 0.77x versus 0.24x for Bunge Global SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingredion, Inc. has a net margin of 1.31% compared to WK Kellogg Co.'s net margin of 9.47%. WK Kellogg Co.'s return on equity of 9.99% beat Ingredion, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.4%.

WK Kellogg Co. has a consensus price target of $23.19, signalling upside risk potential of 0.81%. On the other hand Ingredion, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $124.33 which suggests that it could grow by 14.87%. Given that Ingredion, Inc. has higher upside potential than WK Kellogg Co., analysts believe Ingredion, Inc. is more attractive than WK Kellogg Co..

WK Kellogg Co. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingredion, Inc. has a beta of 0.724, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.613%.

WK Kellogg Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Ingredion, Inc. offers a yield of 2.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. WK Kellogg Co. pays 77.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingredion, Inc. pays out 32.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WK Kellogg Co. quarterly revenues are $613M, which are smaller than Ingredion, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. WK Kellogg Co.'s net income of $8M is lower than Ingredion, Inc.'s net income of $172M. Notably, WK Kellogg Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 62.57x while Ingredion, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WK Kellogg Co. is 0.77x versus 0.98x for Ingredion, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kellanova has a net margin of 1.31% compared to WK Kellogg Co.'s net margin of 9.63%. WK Kellogg Co.'s return on equity of 9.99% beat Kellanova's return on equity of 32.05%.

WK Kellogg Co. has a consensus price target of $23.19, signalling upside risk potential of 0.81%. On the other hand Kellanova has an analysts' consensus of $83.39 which suggests that it could grow by 0.29%. Given that WK Kellogg Co. has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe WK Kellogg Co. is more attractive than Kellanova.

WK Kellogg Co. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kellanova has a beta of 0.236, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.436%.

WK Kellogg Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Kellanova offers a yield of 2.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. WK Kellogg Co. pays 77.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Kellanova pays out 58.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WK Kellogg Co. quarterly revenues are $613M, which are smaller than Kellanova quarterly revenues of $3.3B. WK Kellogg Co.'s net income of $8M is lower than Kellanova's net income of $314M. Notably, WK Kellogg Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 62.57x while Kellanova's PE ratio is 22.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WK Kellogg Co. is 0.77x versus 2.30x for Kellanova. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UMeWorld Ltd. has a net margin of 1.31% compared to WK Kellogg Co.'s net margin of --. WK Kellogg Co.'s return on equity of 9.99% beat UMeWorld Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

WK Kellogg Co. has a consensus price target of $23.19, signalling upside risk potential of 0.81%. On the other hand UMeWorld Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WK Kellogg Co. has higher upside potential than UMeWorld Ltd., analysts believe WK Kellogg Co. is more attractive than UMeWorld Ltd..

WK Kellogg Co. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UMeWorld Ltd. has a beta of -1.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 290.615%.

WK Kellogg Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. UMeWorld Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WK Kellogg Co. pays 77.33% of its earnings as a dividend. UMeWorld Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. WK Kellogg Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WK Kellogg Co. quarterly revenues are $613M, which are larger than UMeWorld Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. WK Kellogg Co.'s net income of $8M is higher than UMeWorld Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, WK Kellogg Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 62.57x while UMeWorld Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WK Kellogg Co. is 0.77x versus 4,072.92x for UMeWorld Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.