JBT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Federal Signal has a net margin of 8.57% compared to John Bean Technologies's net margin of 11.37%. John Bean Technologies's return on equity of 11.63% beat Federal Signal's return on equity of 20.25%.

John Bean Technologies has a consensus price target of $129.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.02%. On the other hand Federal Signal has an analysts' consensus of $101.33 which suggests that it could grow by 7.79%. Given that Federal Signal has higher upside potential than John Bean Technologies, analysts believe Federal Signal is more attractive than John Bean Technologies.

John Bean Technologies has a beta of 1.238, which suggesting that the stock is 23.79% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Federal Signal has a beta of 0.994, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.591%.

John Bean Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. Federal Signal offers a yield of 0.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. John Bean Technologies pays 2.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Federal Signal pays out 15.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

John Bean Technologies quarterly revenues are $453.8M, which are smaller than Federal Signal quarterly revenues of $474.2M. John Bean Technologies's net income of $38.9M is lower than Federal Signal's net income of $53.9M. Notably, John Bean Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.43x while Federal Signal's PE ratio is 27.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for John Bean Technologies is 2.50x versus 3.16x for Federal Signal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Middleby has a net margin of 8.57% compared to John Bean Technologies's net margin of 12.11%. John Bean Technologies's return on equity of 11.63% beat The Middleby's return on equity of 11.77%.

John Bean Technologies has a consensus price target of $129.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.02%. On the other hand The Middleby has an analysts' consensus of $155.86 which suggests that it could grow by 13.44%. Given that The Middleby has higher upside potential than John Bean Technologies, analysts believe The Middleby is more attractive than John Bean Technologies.

John Bean Technologies has a beta of 1.238, which suggesting that the stock is 23.79% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Middleby has a beta of 1.601, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.128%.

John Bean Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. The Middleby offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. John Bean Technologies pays 2.2% of its earnings as a dividend. The Middleby pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. John Bean Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

John Bean Technologies quarterly revenues are $453.8M, which are smaller than The Middleby quarterly revenues of $942.8M. John Bean Technologies's net income of $38.9M is lower than The Middleby's net income of $114.2M. Notably, John Bean Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.43x while The Middleby's PE ratio is 18.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for John Bean Technologies is 2.50x versus 1.92x for The Middleby. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 8.57% compared to John Bean Technologies's net margin of -161.83%. John Bean Technologies's return on equity of 11.63% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -89.48%.

John Bean Technologies has a consensus price target of $129.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.02%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that John Bean Technologies has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe John Bean Technologies is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

John Bean Technologies has a beta of 1.238, which suggesting that the stock is 23.79% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.853, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 185.315%.

John Bean Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. John Bean Technologies pays 2.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. John Bean Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

John Bean Technologies quarterly revenues are $453.8M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.4M. John Bean Technologies's net income of $38.9M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, John Bean Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.43x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for John Bean Technologies is 2.50x versus 4.94x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 8.57% compared to John Bean Technologies's net margin of 0.25%. John Bean Technologies's return on equity of 11.63% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -15.8%.

John Bean Technologies has a consensus price target of $129.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.02%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 248.03%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than John Bean Technologies, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than John Bean Technologies.

John Bean Technologies has a beta of 1.238, which suggesting that the stock is 23.79% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.519%.

John Bean Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.3%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. John Bean Technologies pays 2.2% of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. John Bean Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

John Bean Technologies quarterly revenues are $453.8M, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $29.3M. John Bean Technologies's net income of $38.9M is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of $72K. Notably, John Bean Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.43x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for John Bean Technologies is 2.50x versus 0.21x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.