FSS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 11.37% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of -161.83%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 20.25% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -89.48%.

Federal Signal has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.5%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Federal Signal has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Federal Signal is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Federal Signal has a beta of 0.994, which suggesting that the stock is 0.591% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.853, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 185.315%.

Federal Signal has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Federal Signal pays 15.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Federal Signal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federal Signal quarterly revenues are $474.2M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Federal Signal's net income of $53.9M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Federal Signal's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.61x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Signal is 3.08x versus 3.66x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RBC Bearings has a net margin of 11.37% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of 13.62%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 20.25% beat RBC Bearings's return on equity of 8.13%.

Federal Signal has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.5%. On the other hand RBC Bearings has an analysts' consensus of $338.20 which suggests that it could grow by 10.42%. Given that RBC Bearings has higher upside potential than Federal Signal, analysts believe RBC Bearings is more attractive than Federal Signal.

Federal Signal has a beta of 0.994, which suggesting that the stock is 0.591% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RBC Bearings has a beta of 1.548, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.815%.

Federal Signal has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. RBC Bearings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Federal Signal pays 15.12% of its earnings as a dividend. RBC Bearings pays out 10.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federal Signal quarterly revenues are $474.2M, which are larger than RBC Bearings quarterly revenues of $397.9M. Federal Signal's net income of $53.9M is lower than RBC Bearings's net income of $54.2M. Notably, Federal Signal's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.61x while RBC Bearings's PE ratio is 44.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Signal is 3.08x versus 5.63x for RBC Bearings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regal Rexnord has a net margin of 11.37% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of 4.92%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 20.25% beat Regal Rexnord's return on equity of 3.33%.

Federal Signal has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.5%. On the other hand Regal Rexnord has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 33.69%. Given that Regal Rexnord has higher upside potential than Federal Signal, analysts believe Regal Rexnord is more attractive than Federal Signal.

Federal Signal has a beta of 0.994, which suggesting that the stock is 0.591% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regal Rexnord has a beta of 0.992, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.79900000000001%.

Federal Signal has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. Regal Rexnord offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Federal Signal pays 15.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Regal Rexnord pays out -161.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Federal Signal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federal Signal quarterly revenues are $474.2M, which are smaller than Regal Rexnord quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Federal Signal's net income of $53.9M is lower than Regal Rexnord's net income of $72.7M. Notably, Federal Signal's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.61x while Regal Rexnord's PE ratio is 49.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Signal is 3.08x versus 1.68x for Regal Rexnord. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 11.37% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of 0.25%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 20.25% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -15.8%.

Federal Signal has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.5%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 208.88%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Federal Signal, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Federal Signal.

Federal Signal has a beta of 0.994, which suggesting that the stock is 0.591% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.519%.

Federal Signal has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Federal Signal pays 15.12% of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Federal Signal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federal Signal quarterly revenues are $474.2M, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $29.3M. Federal Signal's net income of $53.9M is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of $72K. Notably, Federal Signal's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.61x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Signal is 3.08x versus 0.23x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.