ITT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enerpac Tool Group has a net margin of 13.67% compared to ITT's net margin of 14.96%. ITT's return on equity of 19.57% beat Enerpac Tool Group's return on equity of 24.73%.

ITT has a consensus price target of $171.36, signalling upside risk potential of 27.01%. On the other hand Enerpac Tool Group has an analysts' consensus of $56.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.39%. Given that Enerpac Tool Group has higher upside potential than ITT, analysts believe Enerpac Tool Group is more attractive than ITT.

ITT has a beta of 1.422, which suggesting that the stock is 42.185% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enerpac Tool Group has a beta of 1.181, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.052%.

ITT has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. Enerpac Tool Group offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. ITT pays 20.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Enerpac Tool Group pays out 2.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ITT quarterly revenues are $929M, which are larger than Enerpac Tool Group quarterly revenues of $145.2M. ITT's net income of $127M is higher than Enerpac Tool Group's net income of $21.7M. Notably, ITT's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.42x while Enerpac Tool Group's PE ratio is 26.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ITT is 3.06x versus 4.07x for Enerpac Tool Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graham has a net margin of 13.67% compared to ITT's net margin of 3.38%. ITT's return on equity of 19.57% beat Graham's return on equity of 8.43%.

ITT has a consensus price target of $171.36, signalling upside risk potential of 27.01%. On the other hand Graham has an analysts' consensus of $52.67 which suggests that it could grow by 64.02%. Given that Graham has higher upside potential than ITT, analysts believe Graham is more attractive than ITT.

ITT has a beta of 1.422, which suggesting that the stock is 42.185% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graham has a beta of 0.730, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.966%.

ITT has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. Graham offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ITT pays 20.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Graham pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ITT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ITT quarterly revenues are $929M, which are larger than Graham quarterly revenues of $47M. ITT's net income of $127M is higher than Graham's net income of $1.6M. Notably, ITT's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.42x while Graham's PE ratio is 38.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ITT is 3.06x versus 1.77x for Graham. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kadant has a net margin of 13.67% compared to ITT's net margin of 9.31%. ITT's return on equity of 19.57% beat Kadant's return on equity of 13.58%.

ITT has a consensus price target of $171.36, signalling upside risk potential of 27.01%. On the other hand Kadant has an analysts' consensus of $341.67 which suggests that it could fall by -3.06%. Given that ITT has higher upside potential than Kadant, analysts believe ITT is more attractive than Kadant.

ITT has a beta of 1.422, which suggesting that the stock is 42.185% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kadant has a beta of 1.254, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.381%.

ITT has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. Kadant offers a yield of 0.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. ITT pays 20.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Kadant pays out 13.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ITT quarterly revenues are $929M, which are larger than Kadant quarterly revenues of $258M. ITT's net income of $127M is higher than Kadant's net income of $24M. Notably, ITT's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.42x while Kadant's PE ratio is 37.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ITT is 3.06x versus 3.94x for Kadant. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nordson has a net margin of 13.67% compared to ITT's net margin of 15.38%. ITT's return on equity of 19.57% beat Nordson's return on equity of 15.96%.

ITT has a consensus price target of $171.36, signalling upside risk potential of 27.01%. On the other hand Nordson has an analysts' consensus of $252.06 which suggests that it could grow by 21.46%. Given that ITT has higher upside potential than Nordson, analysts believe ITT is more attractive than Nordson.

ITT has a beta of 1.422, which suggesting that the stock is 42.185% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordson has a beta of 0.923, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.715%.

ITT has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. Nordson offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. ITT pays 20.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordson pays out 34.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ITT quarterly revenues are $929M, which are larger than Nordson quarterly revenues of $615.4M. ITT's net income of $127M is higher than Nordson's net income of $94.7M. Notably, ITT's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.42x while Nordson's PE ratio is 26.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ITT is 3.06x versus 4.47x for Nordson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.