HHH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

New Concept Energy has a net margin of 22.24% compared to Howard Hughes Holdings's net margin of -10.81%. Howard Hughes Holdings's return on equity of 2.55% beat New Concept Energy's return on equity of -0.83%.

Howard Hughes Holdings has a consensus price target of $90.33, signalling upside risk potential of 17.96%. On the other hand New Concept Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Howard Hughes Holdings has higher upside potential than New Concept Energy, analysts believe Howard Hughes Holdings is more attractive than New Concept Energy.

Howard Hughes Holdings has a beta of 1.481, which suggesting that the stock is 48.097% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Concept Energy has a beta of 0.296, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.439%.

Howard Hughes Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. New Concept Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Howard Hughes Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New Concept Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Howard Hughes Holdings quarterly revenues are $327.1M, which are larger than New Concept Energy quarterly revenues of $37K. Howard Hughes Holdings's net income of $72.8M is higher than New Concept Energy's net income of -$4K. Notably, Howard Hughes Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.72x while New Concept Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Howard Hughes Holdings is 3.06x versus 39.80x for New Concept Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gyrodyne LLC has a net margin of 22.24% compared to Howard Hughes Holdings's net margin of --. Howard Hughes Holdings's return on equity of 2.55% beat Gyrodyne LLC's return on equity of --.

Howard Hughes Holdings has a consensus price target of $90.33, signalling upside risk potential of 17.96%. On the other hand Gyrodyne LLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Howard Hughes Holdings has higher upside potential than Gyrodyne LLC, analysts believe Howard Hughes Holdings is more attractive than Gyrodyne LLC.

Howard Hughes Holdings has a beta of 1.481, which suggesting that the stock is 48.097% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gyrodyne LLC has a beta of 0.506, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.405%.

Howard Hughes Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gyrodyne LLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Howard Hughes Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gyrodyne LLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Howard Hughes Holdings quarterly revenues are $327.1M, which are larger than Gyrodyne LLC quarterly revenues of --. Howard Hughes Holdings's net income of $72.8M is higher than Gyrodyne LLC's net income of --. Notably, Howard Hughes Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.72x while Gyrodyne LLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Howard Hughes Holdings is 3.06x versus 0.23x for Gyrodyne LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

InnSuites Hospitality Trust has a net margin of 22.24% compared to Howard Hughes Holdings's net margin of -15.14%. Howard Hughes Holdings's return on equity of 2.55% beat InnSuites Hospitality Trust's return on equity of -36.77%.

Howard Hughes Holdings has a consensus price target of $90.33, signalling upside risk potential of 17.96%. On the other hand InnSuites Hospitality Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Howard Hughes Holdings has higher upside potential than InnSuites Hospitality Trust, analysts believe Howard Hughes Holdings is more attractive than InnSuites Hospitality Trust.

Howard Hughes Holdings has a beta of 1.481, which suggesting that the stock is 48.097% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison InnSuites Hospitality Trust has a beta of 0.187, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.314%.

Howard Hughes Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. InnSuites Hospitality Trust offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Howard Hughes Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. InnSuites Hospitality Trust pays out 88.35% of its earnings as a dividend. InnSuites Hospitality Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Howard Hughes Holdings quarterly revenues are $327.1M, which are larger than InnSuites Hospitality Trust quarterly revenues of $1.8M. Howard Hughes Holdings's net income of $72.8M is higher than InnSuites Hospitality Trust's net income of -$276.4K. Notably, Howard Hughes Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.72x while InnSuites Hospitality Trust's PE ratio is 47.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Howard Hughes Holdings is 3.06x versus 2.67x for InnSuites Hospitality Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Power REIT has a net margin of 22.24% compared to Howard Hughes Holdings's net margin of -22.79%. Howard Hughes Holdings's return on equity of 2.55% beat Power REIT's return on equity of -104.5%.

Howard Hughes Holdings has a consensus price target of $90.33, signalling upside risk potential of 17.96%. On the other hand Power REIT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3863.96%. Given that Power REIT has higher upside potential than Howard Hughes Holdings, analysts believe Power REIT is more attractive than Howard Hughes Holdings.

Howard Hughes Holdings has a beta of 1.481, which suggesting that the stock is 48.097% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power REIT has a beta of 1.303, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.267%.

Howard Hughes Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Power REIT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Howard Hughes Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Power REIT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Howard Hughes Holdings quarterly revenues are $327.1M, which are larger than Power REIT quarterly revenues of $1.4M. Howard Hughes Holdings's net income of $72.8M is higher than Power REIT's net income of -$325K. Notably, Howard Hughes Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.72x while Power REIT's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Howard Hughes Holdings is 3.06x versus 1.19x for Power REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.