GXO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a net margin of -3.23% compared to GXO Logistics's net margin of 3.34%. GXO Logistics's return on equity of 2.51% beat C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 31.61%.

GXO Logistics has a consensus price target of $56.06, signalling upside risk potential of 8.28%. On the other hand C.H. Robinson Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of $109.97 which suggests that it could grow by 10.63%. Given that C.H. Robinson Worldwide has higher upside potential than GXO Logistics, analysts believe C.H. Robinson Worldwide is more attractive than GXO Logistics.

GXO Logistics has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.892, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.785%.

GXO Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide offers a yield of 2.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. GXO Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays out 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GXO Logistics quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues of $4B. GXO Logistics's net income of -$96M is lower than C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $135.3M. Notably, GXO Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 83.50x while C.H. Robinson Worldwide's PE ratio is 23.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GXO Logistics is 0.51x versus 0.69x for C.H. Robinson Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CSX has a net margin of -3.23% compared to GXO Logistics's net margin of 18.87%. GXO Logistics's return on equity of 2.51% beat CSX's return on equity of 25.75%.

GXO Logistics has a consensus price target of $56.06, signalling upside risk potential of 8.28%. On the other hand CSX has an analysts' consensus of $34.38 which suggests that it could grow by 0.84%. Given that GXO Logistics has higher upside potential than CSX, analysts believe GXO Logistics is more attractive than CSX.

GXO Logistics has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CSX has a beta of 1.235, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.454%.

GXO Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CSX offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. GXO Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CSX pays out 26.8% of its earnings as a dividend. CSX's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GXO Logistics quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than CSX quarterly revenues of $3.4B. GXO Logistics's net income of -$96M is lower than CSX's net income of $646M. Notably, GXO Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 83.50x while CSX's PE ratio is 20.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GXO Logistics is 0.51x versus 4.60x for CSX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pitney Bowes has a net margin of -3.23% compared to GXO Logistics's net margin of 7.18%. GXO Logistics's return on equity of 2.51% beat Pitney Bowes's return on equity of --.

GXO Logistics has a consensus price target of $56.06, signalling upside risk potential of 8.28%. On the other hand Pitney Bowes has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 54.41%. Given that Pitney Bowes has higher upside potential than GXO Logistics, analysts believe Pitney Bowes is more attractive than GXO Logistics.

GXO Logistics has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pitney Bowes has a beta of 1.600, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.009%.

GXO Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pitney Bowes offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. GXO Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pitney Bowes pays out -17.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

GXO Logistics quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Pitney Bowes quarterly revenues of $493.4M. GXO Logistics's net income of -$96M is lower than Pitney Bowes's net income of $35.4M. Notably, GXO Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 83.50x while Pitney Bowes's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GXO Logistics is 0.51x versus 0.87x for Pitney Bowes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPO has a net margin of -3.23% compared to GXO Logistics's net margin of 3.53%. GXO Logistics's return on equity of 2.51% beat XPO's return on equity of 25.22%.

GXO Logistics has a consensus price target of $56.06, signalling upside risk potential of 8.28%. On the other hand XPO has an analysts' consensus of $134.35 which suggests that it could grow by 1.51%. Given that GXO Logistics has higher upside potential than XPO, analysts believe GXO Logistics is more attractive than XPO.

GXO Logistics has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPO has a beta of 1.964, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.419%.

GXO Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. XPO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GXO Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XPO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GXO Logistics quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than XPO quarterly revenues of $2B. GXO Logistics's net income of -$96M is lower than XPO's net income of $69M. Notably, GXO Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 83.50x while XPO's PE ratio is 40.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GXO Logistics is 0.51x versus 1.98x for XPO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.