GPRK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ecopetrol SA has a net margin of 15.74% compared to GeoPark's net margin of 10.54%. GeoPark's return on equity of 59.72% beat Ecopetrol SA's return on equity of 19.25%.

GeoPark has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 72.52%. On the other hand Ecopetrol SA has an analysts' consensus of $12.15 which suggests that it could grow by 20.96%. Given that GeoPark has higher upside potential than Ecopetrol SA, analysts believe GeoPark is more attractive than Ecopetrol SA.

GeoPark has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.519% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ecopetrol SA has a beta of 1.237, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.685%.

GeoPark has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.31%. Ecopetrol SA offers a yield of 41.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. GeoPark pays 26.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Ecopetrol SA pays out 26.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GeoPark quarterly revenues are $159.5M, which are smaller than Ecopetrol SA quarterly revenues of $8.5B. GeoPark's net income of $25.1M is lower than Ecopetrol SA's net income of $893.1M. Notably, GeoPark's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.64x while Ecopetrol SA's PE ratio is 4.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GeoPark is 0.70x versus 0.47x for Ecopetrol SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evolution Petroleum has a net margin of 15.74% compared to GeoPark's net margin of 9.43%. GeoPark's return on equity of 59.72% beat Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 5.54%.

GeoPark has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 72.52%. On the other hand Evolution Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 56.25%. Given that GeoPark has higher upside potential than Evolution Petroleum, analysts believe GeoPark is more attractive than Evolution Petroleum.

GeoPark has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.519% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.231%.

GeoPark has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.31%. Evolution Petroleum offers a yield of 9.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. GeoPark pays 26.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution Petroleum pays out 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. GeoPark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Evolution Petroleum's is not.

GeoPark quarterly revenues are $159.5M, which are larger than Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues of $21.9M. GeoPark's net income of $25.1M is higher than Evolution Petroleum's net income of $2.1M. Notably, GeoPark's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.64x while Evolution Petroleum's PE ratio is 35.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GeoPark is 0.70x versus 1.87x for Evolution Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Equinor ASA has a net margin of 15.74% compared to GeoPark's net margin of 8.98%. GeoPark's return on equity of 59.72% beat Equinor ASA's return on equity of 20%.

GeoPark has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 72.52%. On the other hand Equinor ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 27.08%. Given that GeoPark has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe GeoPark is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

GeoPark has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.519% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.876%.

GeoPark has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.31%. Equinor ASA offers a yield of 6.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. GeoPark pays 26.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Equinor ASA pays out 91.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GeoPark quarterly revenues are $159.5M, which are smaller than Equinor ASA quarterly revenues of $25.4B. GeoPark's net income of $25.1M is lower than Equinor ASA's net income of $2.3B. Notably, GeoPark's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.64x while Equinor ASA's PE ratio is 6.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GeoPark is 0.70x versus 0.61x for Equinor ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flex LNG has a net margin of 15.74% compared to GeoPark's net margin of 19.24%. GeoPark's return on equity of 59.72% beat Flex LNG's return on equity of 10.96%.

GeoPark has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 72.52%. On the other hand Flex LNG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 26.58%. Given that GeoPark has higher upside potential than Flex LNG, analysts believe GeoPark is more attractive than Flex LNG.

GeoPark has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.519% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flex LNG has a beta of 0.710, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.027%.

GeoPark has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.31%. Flex LNG offers a yield of 14.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. GeoPark pays 26.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Flex LNG pays out 150.97% of its earnings as a dividend. GeoPark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Flex LNG's is not.

GeoPark quarterly revenues are $159.5M, which are larger than Flex LNG quarterly revenues of $90.5M. GeoPark's net income of $25.1M is higher than Flex LNG's net income of $17.4M. Notably, GeoPark's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.64x while Flex LNG's PE ratio is 12.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GeoPark is 0.70x versus 3.18x for Flex LNG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.