Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Buy
80
GBLI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$36.00
Seasonality move
:
-0.39%
Day range:
$35.25 - $36.00
52-week range:
$27.47 - $37.00
Dividend yield:
3.61%
P/E ratio:
12.46x
P/S ratio:
1.11x
P/B ratio:
0.72x
Volume:
1.2K
Avg. volume:
5.1K
1-year change:
20%
Market cap:
$492.8M
Revenue:
$528.1M
EPS (TTM):
$2.89
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GBLI
Global Indemnity Group LLC
|
$123M | $0.60 | 4.34% | 85.71% | -- |
|
CNFR
Conifer Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ICCH
ICC Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NMIH
NMI Holdings
|
$164.8M | $1.13 | 11.57% | 11.25% | -- |
|
PLMR
Palomar Holdings
|
$125.8M | $1.05 | 32.36% | 19.06% | -- |
|
TIPT
Tiptree
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GBLI
Global Indemnity Group LLC
|
$36.00 | -- | $492.8M | 12.46x | $0.35 | 3.61% | 1.11x |
|
CNFR
Conifer Holdings
|
$1.05 | -- | $12.8M | 0.43x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.15x |
|
ICCH
ICC Holdings
|
$23.50 | -- | $69.6M | 10.59x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.76x |
|
NMIH
NMI Holdings
|
$36.54 | -- | $2.9B | 8.36x | $0.00 | 0% | 4.70x |
|
PLMR
Palomar Holdings
|
$104.91 | -- | $2.8B | 24.92x | $0.00 | 0% | 5.36x |
|
TIPT
Tiptree
|
$20.34 | -- | $753.7M | 20.97x | $0.25 | 1.18% | 0.39x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GBLI
Global Indemnity Group LLC
|
-- | 0.107 | -- | 1,461.44x |
|
CNFR
Conifer Holdings
|
25.14% | -0.036 | 123.64% | 10.43x |
|
ICCH
ICC Holdings
|
17.03% | 0.470 | 22.08% | 13.15x |
|
NMIH
NMI Holdings
|
15.89% | 0.701 | 12.69% | 4.88x |
|
PLMR
Palomar Holdings
|
-- | 2.183 | -- | 4.06x |
|
TIPT
Tiptree
|
43.35% | 0.592 | 38.67% | 3.29x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GBLI
Global Indemnity Group LLC
|
-- | -- | 6.09% | 6.09% | 14.21% | $15.3M |
|
CNFR
Conifer Holdings
|
-- | -- | 83.29% | 232.39% | -37.32% | -$10.7M |
|
ICCH
ICC Holdings
|
-- | -- | 7.81% | 9.55% | 10.93% | $8.1M |
|
NMIH
NMI Holdings
|
-- | -- | 14.94% | 17.98% | 76.1% | $126.9M |
|
PLMR
Palomar Holdings
|
-- | -- | 19.53% | 20.63% | 26.01% | $98.8M |
|
TIPT
Tiptree
|
-- | -- | 4.31% | 6.8% | 8.98% | $60.7M |
Global Indemnity Group LLC vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GBLI or CNFR?
Conifer Holdings has a net margin of 11.42% compared to Global Indemnity Group LLC's net margin of -14.12%. Global Indemnity Group LLC's return on equity of 6.09% beat Conifer Holdings's return on equity of 232.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GBLIGlobal Indemnity Group LLC-- $0.92 $686.7M CNFRConifer Holdings-- $4.32 $65.5M -
What do Analysts Say About GBLI or CNFR?
Global Indemnity Group LLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 52.78%. On the other hand Conifer Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -41.91%. Given that Global Indemnity Group LLC has higher upside potential than Conifer Holdings, analysts believe Global Indemnity Group LLC is more attractive than Conifer Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GBLIGlobal Indemnity Group LLC0 0 0 CNFRConifer Holdings0 0 0 -
Is GBLI or CNFR More Risky?
Global Indemnity Group LLC has a beta of 0.422, which suggesting that the stock is 57.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conifer Holdings has a beta of 0.591, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.894%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GBLI or CNFR?
Global Indemnity Group LLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. Conifer Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Indemnity Group LLC pays 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Conifer Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Indemnity Group LLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GBLI or CNFR?
Global Indemnity Group LLC quarterly revenues are $111.8M, which are larger than Conifer Holdings quarterly revenues of $16M. Global Indemnity Group LLC's net income of $12.8M is lower than Conifer Holdings's net income of $53.3M. Notably, Global Indemnity Group LLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.46x while Conifer Holdings's PE ratio is 0.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Indemnity Group LLC is 1.11x versus 0.15x for Conifer Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GBLIGlobal Indemnity Group LLC1.11x 12.46x $111.8M $12.8M CNFRConifer Holdings0.15x 0.43x $16M $53.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns GBLI or ICCH?
ICC Holdings has a net margin of 11.42% compared to Global Indemnity Group LLC's net margin of 8.42%. Global Indemnity Group LLC's return on equity of 6.09% beat ICC Holdings's return on equity of 9.55%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GBLIGlobal Indemnity Group LLC-- $0.92 $686.7M ICCHICC Holdings-- $0.69 $88.1M -
What do Analysts Say About GBLI or ICCH?
Global Indemnity Group LLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 52.78%. On the other hand ICC Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Indemnity Group LLC has higher upside potential than ICC Holdings, analysts believe Global Indemnity Group LLC is more attractive than ICC Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GBLIGlobal Indemnity Group LLC0 0 0 ICCHICC Holdings0 0 0 -
Is GBLI or ICCH More Risky?
Global Indemnity Group LLC has a beta of 0.422, which suggesting that the stock is 57.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICC Holdings has a beta of 0.322, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.79%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GBLI or ICCH?
Global Indemnity Group LLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. ICC Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Indemnity Group LLC pays 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. ICC Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Indemnity Group LLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GBLI or ICCH?
Global Indemnity Group LLC quarterly revenues are $111.8M, which are larger than ICC Holdings quarterly revenues of $24.4M. Global Indemnity Group LLC's net income of $12.8M is higher than ICC Holdings's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Global Indemnity Group LLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.46x while ICC Holdings's PE ratio is 10.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Indemnity Group LLC is 1.11x versus 0.76x for ICC Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GBLIGlobal Indemnity Group LLC1.11x 12.46x $111.8M $12.8M ICCHICC Holdings0.76x 10.59x $24.4M $2.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns GBLI or NMIH?
NMI Holdings has a net margin of 11.42% compared to Global Indemnity Group LLC's net margin of 55.88%. Global Indemnity Group LLC's return on equity of 6.09% beat NMI Holdings's return on equity of 17.98%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GBLIGlobal Indemnity Group LLC-- $0.92 $686.7M NMIHNMI Holdings-- $1.15 $2.6B -
What do Analysts Say About GBLI or NMIH?
Global Indemnity Group LLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 52.78%. On the other hand NMI Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 19.05%. Given that Global Indemnity Group LLC has higher upside potential than NMI Holdings, analysts believe Global Indemnity Group LLC is more attractive than NMI Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GBLIGlobal Indemnity Group LLC0 0 0 NMIHNMI Holdings0 0 0 -
Is GBLI or NMIH More Risky?
Global Indemnity Group LLC has a beta of 0.422, which suggesting that the stock is 57.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NMI Holdings has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.311%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GBLI or NMIH?
Global Indemnity Group LLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. NMI Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Indemnity Group LLC pays 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. NMI Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Indemnity Group LLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GBLI or NMIH?
Global Indemnity Group LLC quarterly revenues are $111.8M, which are smaller than NMI Holdings quarterly revenues of $166.1M. Global Indemnity Group LLC's net income of $12.8M is lower than NMI Holdings's net income of $92.8M. Notably, Global Indemnity Group LLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.46x while NMI Holdings's PE ratio is 8.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Indemnity Group LLC is 1.11x versus 4.70x for NMI Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GBLIGlobal Indemnity Group LLC1.11x 12.46x $111.8M $12.8M NMIHNMI Holdings4.70x 8.36x $166.1M $92.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns GBLI or PLMR?
Palomar Holdings has a net margin of 11.42% compared to Global Indemnity Group LLC's net margin of 20.56%. Global Indemnity Group LLC's return on equity of 6.09% beat Palomar Holdings's return on equity of 20.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GBLIGlobal Indemnity Group LLC-- $0.92 $686.7M PLMRPalomar Holdings-- $1.15 $703.3M -
What do Analysts Say About GBLI or PLMR?
Global Indemnity Group LLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 52.78%. On the other hand Palomar Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.08%. Given that Global Indemnity Group LLC has higher upside potential than Palomar Holdings, analysts believe Global Indemnity Group LLC is more attractive than Palomar Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GBLIGlobal Indemnity Group LLC0 0 0 PLMRPalomar Holdings3 3 0 -
Is GBLI or PLMR More Risky?
Global Indemnity Group LLC has a beta of 0.422, which suggesting that the stock is 57.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palomar Holdings has a beta of 0.359, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.131%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GBLI or PLMR?
Global Indemnity Group LLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. Palomar Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Indemnity Group LLC pays 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Palomar Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Indemnity Group LLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GBLI or PLMR?
Global Indemnity Group LLC quarterly revenues are $111.8M, which are smaller than Palomar Holdings quarterly revenues of $148.4M. Global Indemnity Group LLC's net income of $12.8M is lower than Palomar Holdings's net income of $30.5M. Notably, Global Indemnity Group LLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.46x while Palomar Holdings's PE ratio is 24.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Indemnity Group LLC is 1.11x versus 5.36x for Palomar Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GBLIGlobal Indemnity Group LLC1.11x 12.46x $111.8M $12.8M PLMRPalomar Holdings5.36x 24.92x $148.4M $30.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns GBLI or TIPT?
Tiptree has a net margin of 11.42% compared to Global Indemnity Group LLC's net margin of 2.41%. Global Indemnity Group LLC's return on equity of 6.09% beat Tiptree's return on equity of 6.8%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GBLIGlobal Indemnity Group LLC-- $0.92 $686.7M TIPTTiptree-- $0.29 $1B -
What do Analysts Say About GBLI or TIPT?
Global Indemnity Group LLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 52.78%. On the other hand Tiptree has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -77.06%. Given that Global Indemnity Group LLC has higher upside potential than Tiptree, analysts believe Global Indemnity Group LLC is more attractive than Tiptree.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GBLIGlobal Indemnity Group LLC0 0 0 TIPTTiptree0 0 0 -
Is GBLI or TIPT More Risky?
Global Indemnity Group LLC has a beta of 0.422, which suggesting that the stock is 57.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tiptree has a beta of 1.305, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.501%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GBLI or TIPT?
Global Indemnity Group LLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. Tiptree offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Global Indemnity Group LLC pays 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Tiptree pays out 98.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GBLI or TIPT?
Global Indemnity Group LLC quarterly revenues are $111.8M, which are smaller than Tiptree quarterly revenues of $494.4M. Global Indemnity Group LLC's net income of $12.8M is higher than Tiptree's net income of $11.9M. Notably, Global Indemnity Group LLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.46x while Tiptree's PE ratio is 20.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Indemnity Group LLC is 1.11x versus 0.39x for Tiptree. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GBLIGlobal Indemnity Group LLC1.11x 12.46x $111.8M $12.8M TIPTTiptree0.39x 20.97x $494.4M $11.9M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
